Las transferencias de datos a través del Metaverso a la luz de los últimos acuerdos (UE - EE.UU.). El fenómeno “tú a Londres y yo a California”

  1. Cruz Ángeles, Jonatán
Revista:
Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 15

Número: 2

Páginas: 251-292

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.20318/CDT.2023.8056 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este artículo realiza un análisis exhaustivo de las transferencias extracomunitarias de datos, vitales para la implementación y gestión del Metaverso, con un enfoque particular en las regulaciones de la Unión Europea y Estados Unidos. Se enfoca en la repercusión de las decisiones jurídicas más cruciales del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea respecto a la protección de los datos personales de los ciudadanos europeos en estos espacios virtuales emergentes. Involucra un estudio detallado de la doctrina especializada para determinar si el Acuerdo recientemente revelado entre la Unión Europea y los Estados Unidos, el 10 de julio de 2023, es suficientemente robusto o si, en su defecto, es necesario investigar otras alternativas o medidas que deberían ser consideradas por gigantes tecnológicos como Meta. El objetivo último es dilucidar la extensión real y efectiva de los derechos a la privacidad y la salvaguarda transatlántica de los datos personales en el ámbito digital contemporáneo

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akandji-Kombe, J. (2007) Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide to the Implementation of the ECHR.
  • Angelini, L. Towards an Emotionally Augmented Metaverse: A Framework for Recording and Analysing Physiological Data and User Behaviour (2022) 13th Augmented Human International Conference, pp. 1-5.
  • Ausloos, Jef (2020) The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law, pp. 54-90. 26 20
  • Bamberger, K.A., Mulligan, D.K. Privacy on the ground: driving corporate behavior in the United States and Europe (2015) Privacy on the Ground: Driving Corporate Behavior in the United States and Europe. 80 18
  • Bennett, C.J. (1992) Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. 281
  • Besson, S. Sovereignty. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. R. Wuolfrum (2011) Sovereignty. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
  • Bignami, F. European versus american liberty: A comparative privacy analysis of antiterrorism data mining (2007) Boston College Law Review, 48 (3), pp. 609-698.
  • Bignami, F., Resta, G. Human Rights Extraterritoriality (2018) Community Interests across International Law, pp. 357-380.
  • Bradford, A. The Brussels effect (2012) Northwestern University Law Review, 107 (1), pp. 1-68.
  • Brkan, M. Data protection and European private international law: Observing a bull in a China shop (2015) International Data Privacy Law, 5 (4), pp. 257-278. 9 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipv022
  • Brkan, M. The court of justice of the EU, privacy and data protection: Judge-made law as a leitmotif in fundamental rights protection (2017) Courts, Privacy and Data Protection in the Digital Environment, pp. 10-31.
  • Brkan, M. The essence of the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection: Finding the way through the maze of the CJEU's constitutional reasoning (2019) German Law Journal, 20 (6), pp. 864-883. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2019.66 3
  • Brkan, M. The Unstoppable Expansion of the EU Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Little Shop of Horrors? (2016) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23 (5), pp. 812-841. DOI: 10.1177/1023263X1602300505
  • Buttarelli, G. The EU GDPR as a clarion call for a new global digital gold standard (2016) International Data Privacy Law, 6 (2), pp. 77-78. DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipw006
  • Chander, A., Schwartz, P. M. Privacy and/or Trade (2023) University of Chicago Law Review, 90 (1), pp. 49-135. 13 26
  • Cole, D., Fabbrini, F. Bridging the transatlantic divide? The United States, the european union, and the protection of privacy across borders (2016) International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (1), pp. 220-237. 26 DOI: 10.1093/icon/mow012 25
  • Di Pietro, R., Cresci, S. Metaverse: Security and Privacy Issues (2021) Proceedings - 2021 3rd IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications, TPS-ISA 2021, pp. 281-288. 123 DOI: 10.1109/TPSISA52974.2021.00032 6
  • Dincelli, E., Yayla, A. Immersive virtual reality in the age of the Metaverse: A hybrid-narrative review based on the technology affordance perspective (2022) Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31 (2), art. no. 101717, . 186 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101717 28
  • Dionisio, J.D.N., Burns Iii, W.G., Gilbert, R. 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities (2013) ACM Computing Surveys, 45 (3), art. no. 34, . 544 DOI: 10.1145/2480741.2480751 30
  • Dozio, N., Marcolin, F., Scurati, G.W., Ulrich, L., Nonis, F., Vezzetti, E., Marsocci, G., La Rosa, A., Ferrise, F. A design methodology for affective Virtual Reality (2022) International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 162, art. no. 102791, . 60 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102791 5
  • Fuster, G.G. (2014) The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU.
  • Glancy, D. The invention of the right to privacy (1979) Arizona Law Review, 21 (1), pp. 1-39. 51 17
  • Gstrein, O.J., Zwitter, A.J. Extraterritorial application of the gdpr: Promoting european values or power? (2021) Internet Policy Review, 10 (3), . 17 DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1576 24
  • Han, J., Heo, J., You, E. Analysis of metaverse platform as a new play culture: Focusing on roblox and ZEPETO (2021) CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3026, pp. 27-36. 15 11
  • Hildebrandt, M. Extraterritorial jurisdiction to enforce in cyberspace? bodin, schmitt, grotius in cyberspace (2013) University of Toronto Law Journal, 63 (2), pp. 196-224. 39 DOI: 10.3138/utlj.1119 23
  • Kohl, U. Jurisdiction in cyberspace (2015) Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace, pp. 30-54. 11 DOI: 10.4337/9781782547396.00011 8
  • Kraus, S., Kanbach, D.K., Krysta, P.M., Steinhoff, M.M., Tomini, N. Facebook and the creation of the metaverse: radical business model innovation or incremental transformation? (2022) International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 28 (9), pp. 52-77. 193 DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2021-0984
  • Nissenbaum, H. (2010) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. 1945
  • Rauschnabel, P.A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., Alt, F. What is XR? Towards a Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality (2022) Computers in Human Behavior, 133, art. no. 107289, . 266 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107289 29
  • Riva, G., Wiederhold, B.K. What the Metaverse Is (Really) and Why We Need to Know about It (2022) Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25 (6), pp. 355-359. 71 DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0124
  • Scheinin, M. 'Characteristics of Human Rights Norms' (2009) International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook, pp. 19-37.
  • Svantesson, D., Kloza, D. (2017) Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Relations as A Challenge for Democracy.
  • Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. 4546
  • Zhou, M., Leenders, M.A.A.M., Cong, L.M. Ownership in the virtual world and the implications for long-term user innovation success (2018) Technovation, 78, pp. 56-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.002
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet