Rendimiento en las empresas familiares desde las teorías de recursos y capacidades y de agencia

  1. Pedro Núñez - Cacho Utr illa
  2. Félix Grande Torraleja
  3. Agustín Muñoz Vázquez
Revista:
European Journal of Family Business

ISSN: 2444-877X

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 2

Número: 1

Páginas: 7-20

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V2I1.4060 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Journal of Family Business

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

One of the issues that family business research strive s to know is the influence of the family in the business practices. W hen researchers assess the performance of these organizations should use indicators to collect the family character of these firms. On the other hand, we must consider the implicat ions of the theoretical framework employed, such as the agency theory or the resource based view . A fter a review of the state of affairs , this paper proposes an indicator that includes all these features and is useful for measuring performance in these org anizations. Finally, the proposed scale is validated on a sample of family businesses.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akdere, M. & Schmidt, S. (2007). Measuring the Effects of Employee Orientation Training on Employee Perceptions of Quality Management: Implications for Human Resources. The Business Review, Cambridge , 7 (2), 336 - 343.
  • Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent . Strategic Management Journal , 14 , 33 - 46.
  • Anderson, R. & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownerships and firm per formance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of finance , 58 , 2 8 - 38.
  • Athanassionu, N., Crittenden, W. F., Kelly, L. M., & Marquez, P. G. (2002). Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firm ́s top management group: Firm culture, strategic vision and goals, and firm performance. Journal of World Business , 37 , 139 - 150.
  • Barnett , T., Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2009). The Effects of Family Versus Career Role Salience on the Performance of Family and Nonfamily Firms. Family Business Review , 22 (1) , 39 - 52.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management , 17 , 99 - 110.
  • Barontini, R. & Caprio, L. (2006). The effects on family control on family value and performance: evidence from continental Europe . European Financial Management , 12 , 689 - 723.
  • Basco, J. T. (2005). Comportamientos en la dirección y gobierno de la empresa familiar: Análisis empírico de profesionalización como continuidad de gara n tía. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Ben tler, P. M. (2006). EQS structural equat ions program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Sof t ware
  • Bhatnagar, J. (2006). Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm perfomance linkage . The Learning Organization , 13 (5), 416 - 433.
  • Bjuggren, P. O. & Palmberg, J. (2010). The Impact of Vote Differentiation on Investment Performance in Listed Family Firms. Family Business Review , 23 (4), 327 - 340.
  • Brandenburger, A. & Stuart, H. (1996). Value - based business strategy . Journal of E conomics and Management Strategy , 5, 5 - 24.
  • Carlson, D. S., Upton, N ., & Seamans, S. (2006). The impact of human resources practices and compensation design on performance: An analysis of family - owned SME'S. Journal of Small Business Management , 44 (4), 531 - 543.
  • Chand, M. & Katou, A. (2007). The impact of HRM practices on organizational performance in the Indian hotel industry . Employee Relations , 29 (6), 576 - 594.
  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J ., & Litz , R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (4), 467 - 472.
  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family - Centered Non - Economic Goals in Small Firms . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 36 (2), 267 - 29 3 .
  • De Carolis, D. & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stock and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance. An empirical investigation of biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (10), 953 - 96 6 .
  • De Kok, J. M. P., Uhlaner, L. M., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Professional HRM Practices in family owned - management enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management , 44 (3), 441 - 460.
  • Delane y, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal , 39 (4), 949 - 971.
  • Dyer, W. G. (2006). Examining the "Family Effect" on Firm Performance. Family B usiness Review, 19 (4), 253 - 261.
  • Gómez - Mejía, L., Núñez, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal , 44 (1) , 8 1 - 95
  • Gómez - Mejía, L., Takacs, K., Núñez, M., Jacobson, K., & Moyano, J. (2007). Socioemo tional Wealth and Business Risks in Family - controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly , 52 (1) , 106 - 137.
  • Habbershon, T. G., William, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm pe rformance. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (4) , 451 - 465.
  • Hassan, M., Hagen, A ., & Daig.I. (2006). Strategic human resources as a strategic weapon for enhacing labor productivity. Strategic Management Journal , 5 , 7 5 - 96.
  • Hienerth, C. & Kessler, A. (2006). M easuring Success in Family Businesses: The Conce p t of Configurational Fit. Family Business Review , 19 (2) , 115 - 134.
  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal , 40 (1) , 171 - 188.
  • Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. E., & Beatty, R. (2005). The workforce scorecard: Managing human capital to execute strategy. Harvard Business School: Boston.
  • Jaskiewicz, P., González, V. M., Mene ndez, S., & Dirk, S. (2005). Long - Run IPO Performance Analysis of German and Spanish Family - Owned Businesses. Family Business Review , 18 (3) , 179 - 202.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. John Wiley: New Y ork.
  • Kowale wski, O., Talavera, O., & Stetsyuk, I. (2010). Influence of Family Involvement in Management and Ownership on Firm Performance: Evidence From Poland. Family Business Review , 23 (1) , 45 - 59.
  • Lee, J. (2004). The effects of family ownerships and management on f irm performance. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal , 69 , 46 - 53.
  • Lee, J. (2006). Impact of Family Relationships on Attitudes of the Second Generation in Family Business. Family Business Review , 19 (3) , 175.
  • Leiblein, M. (2011). What Do Resource and Capabilit y - Based Theories Propose? Journal of Management , 37 (1) , 909 - 932.
  • Levie, J. & Lerner, M. (2009). Resource Mobilization and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Businesses in the United Kingdom. Family Business Review , 22 (1) , 25 - 38.
  • Li, Y., Zhao, Y., & Liu, Y i. (2006). The relations between HRM, technology innovatio n and perfomance in China . International Journal of Manpower , 27 (7) , 679 - 697.
  • Liao, Y. (2006). The effect of fit between organizational life cycle and human resources management control on firm performance. Journal American Academy of Business , 8 (1) , 192 - 208.
  • Marques, D. & Simon, F. (2006). The effect of knowledge management practices on firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management , 10 (3) , 143 - 156.
  • Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top Management Teams in Family - Controlled Compan i es: ' Familiness', 'Faultlines', and Their Impact on Financial Performance . Journal of Management Studies . 47 (2), 205 - 222.
  • Molly , V., Laveren, E., & Deloof, M. (2010). Family Business Successi on and Its Impact on Financial Structure and Performance . Family Business Review , 23 (2) , 131 - 147.
  • Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Karin, S. b., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms. Family Business Revie w , 20 (1) , 33 - 43.
  • Núñez - Cacho, P. y Grande, F. (2012). El desarrollo de los recursos humanos a través del mentoring: el caso español. Intangible Capital , 8 (4), 61 - 71.
  • Núñez - Cacho, P. Grande, F. y Pedrosa, C. (2012). "Nuevos retos en el desarrollo de carrera profesional: el modelo boundaryless career. Universia Business Review,34 (in press).
  • O'Boyle, E. H., Rutherford, M. W., & Pollack, J. M. (2010). Examining the Relation Between Ethical Focus and Financial Performance in Family Firms: An Exploratory Study. Family Business Review , 23 (4) , 310 - 326.
  • Olson, P . D., Zuicker, V. S., Sharon, M. D., & Stafford, K. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (5) , 639 - 666.
  • Pearson, A. W. & Lumpkin , G. T. (2011). Measurement in family business research: How do we measure up? Family Business Review, 24 (4), 287 - 291.
  • Peteraf, M. A. & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource - based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics , 24 , 309 - 323.
  • Powers, T. & Hahn, W. (2002). Skill and resources based competitive methods: i m pact onf firm performance. Journal of Services Marketing , 16 (2) , 113 - 122.
  • Rojo, A., Diéguez, J., & López, P. (2011). La importancia del concepto de Empresa Familiar en investigación: ut ilización de la base de datos SABI para su clasificación. Revista de Empresa Familiar , 1 (1) , 53 - 67.
  • Rutheford, M. W., Muse, L. A., & Oswald, S. L. (2006). A new perspective of the developmental model for family business. Family Business Review , 19 (4) , 317 - 326.
  • Rutheford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, A. T. (2008). Examining the Link Between "Familiness" and Performance: Can the F - PEC Untangle the Family Business Theory Jungle? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6) , 1089 - 1 109.
  • Sacristán, M., Góme z, S., & Cabeza, L. (2011). Family Ownership and Control, the Presence of Other Large Shareholders, and Firm Performance: Further Evidence. Family Business Review, 24 (1) , 71 - 93.
  • Schulze, W . S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. (2001). Agency r elationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science , 12 (2) , 99 - 116.
  • Schulze, W . S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing , 1 8 (4), 473 - 490.
  • Sciascia, S. & Mazzola, P. (2008). Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance . Family Business Review , 21 (4) , 331 - 345.
  • Sorenson, R. (2003). Family Business Gathering 2001, The Holistic Model: Destroying Myths and Creat ing Value in Family Business . Family Business Review , 16 (3) , 224 - 226.
  • Sorenson, R. & Bierman, L. (2009). Family Capital, Family Business, and Free Enterprise. Family Business Review, 22, 193 - 195.
  • Stockmans, A., Lybaert, M., & Coordeckers, W. 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Earnings Management in Private Family Firms. Family Business Review , 23 (3) , 280 - 294.
  • Vallejo, M. C. (2007). What a family business? A discussion o f an integrativa and operational definition. Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4 ( 4) , 473 - 488.
  • Venter , E., Boshoff, C., & Maas, G. (2005). The Influence of Successor - Related Factors on the Succession Process in Small and Medium - Sized Family Businesses. Family Business Review, 18 (4) , 283 - 304.
  • Walkers, G. (2004). Modern Competitive Strate gy . New York: McGraw - Hill.
  • Wang , D., Tsui, A., & Yichi Zang, L. (2003). Employement relationships and firm performance: evidence from a emergent economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (5) , 511 - 529.
  • Welsh, H. & Klandt, H. (1997). International Entre preneurship and Small Business Biography, 2nd ed . Chicago: De Paul Univer s ity.
  • Westhead, P. & Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and Management Issues Associated With Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives. Family Business Review, 19 , 301 - 317.
  • Yammeesri , J. & Lodh, S. C. (2004). Is family ownerships a pain of gain to firm performance? Journal of American Academy of Business, 4 , 263 - 289.
  • Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involve ment. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 , 495 - 512.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet