Rendimiento en las empresas familiares desde las teorías de recursos y capacidades y de agencia

  1. Pedro Núñez - Cacho Utr illa
  2. Félix Grande Torraleja
  3. Agustín Muñoz Vázquez
Journal:
European Journal of Family Business

ISSN: 2444-877X

Year of publication: 2012

Volume: 2

Issue: 1

Pages: 7-20

Type: Article

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V2I1.4060 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: European Journal of Family Business

Abstract

Una de las cuestiones que l as investigaciones sobre empresa familiar se esfuerzan en conocer es la influencia que tiene la familia en la empresa. Generalmente se estudia su efecto sobre las distintas prácticas empresariales. Sin embargo , cuando los investigadores valore n el rendimiento de estas organizaciones debe n emplear indicadores que recojan el carácter familiar de estas firmas . Además, se deben tener en consideración las implicaciones derivadas del marco teórico empleado, como puede ser la teoría de la agencia , la de recursos y capacidades u otras . Por ello, tras realizar una revisió n del estado de la cuestión, s e propone un indicador que recoja todas estas particularidades y sea útil para la medida del rendimiento en estas organizaciones. Finalmente, la escala elaborada se valida aplicándose sobre una muestra de empresas familiares

Bibliographic References

  • Akdere, M. & Schmidt, S. (2007). Measuring the Effects of Employee Orientation Training on Employee Perceptions of Quality Management: Implications for Human Resources. The Business Review, Cambridge , 7 (2), 336 - 343.
  • Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent . Strategic Management Journal , 14 , 33 - 46.
  • Anderson, R. & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownerships and firm per formance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of finance , 58 , 2 8 - 38.
  • Athanassionu, N., Crittenden, W. F., Kelly, L. M., & Marquez, P. G. (2002). Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firm ́s top management group: Firm culture, strategic vision and goals, and firm performance. Journal of World Business , 37 , 139 - 150.
  • Barnett , T., Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2009). The Effects of Family Versus Career Role Salience on the Performance of Family and Nonfamily Firms. Family Business Review , 22 (1) , 39 - 52.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management , 17 , 99 - 110.
  • Barontini, R. & Caprio, L. (2006). The effects on family control on family value and performance: evidence from continental Europe . European Financial Management , 12 , 689 - 723.
  • Basco, J. T. (2005). Comportamientos en la dirección y gobierno de la empresa familiar: Análisis empírico de profesionalización como continuidad de gara n tía. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Ben tler, P. M. (2006). EQS structural equat ions program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Sof t ware
  • Bhatnagar, J. (2006). Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm perfomance linkage . The Learning Organization , 13 (5), 416 - 433.
  • Bjuggren, P. O. & Palmberg, J. (2010). The Impact of Vote Differentiation on Investment Performance in Listed Family Firms. Family Business Review , 23 (4), 327 - 340.
  • Brandenburger, A. & Stuart, H. (1996). Value - based business strategy . Journal of E conomics and Management Strategy , 5, 5 - 24.
  • Carlson, D. S., Upton, N ., & Seamans, S. (2006). The impact of human resources practices and compensation design on performance: An analysis of family - owned SME'S. Journal of Small Business Management , 44 (4), 531 - 543.
  • Chand, M. & Katou, A. (2007). The impact of HRM practices on organizational performance in the Indian hotel industry . Employee Relations , 29 (6), 576 - 594.
  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J ., & Litz , R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (4), 467 - 472.
  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family - Centered Non - Economic Goals in Small Firms . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 36 (2), 267 - 29 3 .
  • De Carolis, D. & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stock and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance. An empirical investigation of biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (10), 953 - 96 6 .
  • De Kok, J. M. P., Uhlaner, L. M., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Professional HRM Practices in family owned - management enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management , 44 (3), 441 - 460.
  • Delane y, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal , 39 (4), 949 - 971.
  • Dyer, W. G. (2006). Examining the "Family Effect" on Firm Performance. Family B usiness Review, 19 (4), 253 - 261.
  • Gómez - Mejía, L., Núñez, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal , 44 (1) , 8 1 - 95
  • Gómez - Mejía, L., Takacs, K., Núñez, M., Jacobson, K., & Moyano, J. (2007). Socioemo tional Wealth and Business Risks in Family - controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly , 52 (1) , 106 - 137.
  • Habbershon, T. G., William, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm pe rformance. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (4) , 451 - 465.
  • Hassan, M., Hagen, A ., & Daig.I. (2006). Strategic human resources as a strategic weapon for enhacing labor productivity. Strategic Management Journal , 5 , 7 5 - 96.
  • Hienerth, C. & Kessler, A. (2006). M easuring Success in Family Businesses: The Conce p t of Configurational Fit. Family Business Review , 19 (2) , 115 - 134.
  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal , 40 (1) , 171 - 188.
  • Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. E., & Beatty, R. (2005). The workforce scorecard: Managing human capital to execute strategy. Harvard Business School: Boston.
  • Jaskiewicz, P., González, V. M., Mene ndez, S., & Dirk, S. (2005). Long - Run IPO Performance Analysis of German and Spanish Family - Owned Businesses. Family Business Review , 18 (3) , 179 - 202.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. John Wiley: New Y ork.
  • Kowale wski, O., Talavera, O., & Stetsyuk, I. (2010). Influence of Family Involvement in Management and Ownership on Firm Performance: Evidence From Poland. Family Business Review , 23 (1) , 45 - 59.
  • Lee, J. (2004). The effects of family ownerships and management on f irm performance. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal , 69 , 46 - 53.
  • Lee, J. (2006). Impact of Family Relationships on Attitudes of the Second Generation in Family Business. Family Business Review , 19 (3) , 175.
  • Leiblein, M. (2011). What Do Resource and Capabilit y - Based Theories Propose? Journal of Management , 37 (1) , 909 - 932.
  • Levie, J. & Lerner, M. (2009). Resource Mobilization and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Businesses in the United Kingdom. Family Business Review , 22 (1) , 25 - 38.
  • Li, Y., Zhao, Y., & Liu, Y i. (2006). The relations between HRM, technology innovatio n and perfomance in China . International Journal of Manpower , 27 (7) , 679 - 697.
  • Liao, Y. (2006). The effect of fit between organizational life cycle and human resources management control on firm performance. Journal American Academy of Business , 8 (1) , 192 - 208.
  • Marques, D. & Simon, F. (2006). The effect of knowledge management practices on firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management , 10 (3) , 143 - 156.
  • Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top Management Teams in Family - Controlled Compan i es: ' Familiness', 'Faultlines', and Their Impact on Financial Performance . Journal of Management Studies . 47 (2), 205 - 222.
  • Molly , V., Laveren, E., & Deloof, M. (2010). Family Business Successi on and Its Impact on Financial Structure and Performance . Family Business Review , 23 (2) , 131 - 147.
  • Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Karin, S. b., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms. Family Business Revie w , 20 (1) , 33 - 43.
  • Núñez - Cacho, P. y Grande, F. (2012). El desarrollo de los recursos humanos a través del mentoring: el caso español. Intangible Capital , 8 (4), 61 - 71.
  • Núñez - Cacho, P. Grande, F. y Pedrosa, C. (2012). "Nuevos retos en el desarrollo de carrera profesional: el modelo boundaryless career. Universia Business Review,34 (in press).
  • O'Boyle, E. H., Rutherford, M. W., & Pollack, J. M. (2010). Examining the Relation Between Ethical Focus and Financial Performance in Family Firms: An Exploratory Study. Family Business Review , 23 (4) , 310 - 326.
  • Olson, P . D., Zuicker, V. S., Sharon, M. D., & Stafford, K. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing , 18 (5) , 639 - 666.
  • Pearson, A. W. & Lumpkin , G. T. (2011). Measurement in family business research: How do we measure up? Family Business Review, 24 (4), 287 - 291.
  • Peteraf, M. A. & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource - based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics , 24 , 309 - 323.
  • Powers, T. & Hahn, W. (2002). Skill and resources based competitive methods: i m pact onf firm performance. Journal of Services Marketing , 16 (2) , 113 - 122.
  • Rojo, A., Diéguez, J., & López, P. (2011). La importancia del concepto de Empresa Familiar en investigación: ut ilización de la base de datos SABI para su clasificación. Revista de Empresa Familiar , 1 (1) , 53 - 67.
  • Rutheford, M. W., Muse, L. A., & Oswald, S. L. (2006). A new perspective of the developmental model for family business. Family Business Review , 19 (4) , 317 - 326.
  • Rutheford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, A. T. (2008). Examining the Link Between "Familiness" and Performance: Can the F - PEC Untangle the Family Business Theory Jungle? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (6) , 1089 - 1 109.
  • Sacristán, M., Góme z, S., & Cabeza, L. (2011). Family Ownership and Control, the Presence of Other Large Shareholders, and Firm Performance: Further Evidence. Family Business Review, 24 (1) , 71 - 93.
  • Schulze, W . S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. (2001). Agency r elationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science , 12 (2) , 99 - 116.
  • Schulze, W . S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing , 1 8 (4), 473 - 490.
  • Sciascia, S. & Mazzola, P. (2008). Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance . Family Business Review , 21 (4) , 331 - 345.
  • Sorenson, R. (2003). Family Business Gathering 2001, The Holistic Model: Destroying Myths and Creat ing Value in Family Business . Family Business Review , 16 (3) , 224 - 226.
  • Sorenson, R. & Bierman, L. (2009). Family Capital, Family Business, and Free Enterprise. Family Business Review, 22, 193 - 195.
  • Stockmans, A., Lybaert, M., & Coordeckers, W. 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Earnings Management in Private Family Firms. Family Business Review , 23 (3) , 280 - 294.
  • Vallejo, M. C. (2007). What a family business? A discussion o f an integrativa and operational definition. Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4 ( 4) , 473 - 488.
  • Venter , E., Boshoff, C., & Maas, G. (2005). The Influence of Successor - Related Factors on the Succession Process in Small and Medium - Sized Family Businesses. Family Business Review, 18 (4) , 283 - 304.
  • Walkers, G. (2004). Modern Competitive Strate gy . New York: McGraw - Hill.
  • Wang , D., Tsui, A., & Yichi Zang, L. (2003). Employement relationships and firm performance: evidence from a emergent economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (5) , 511 - 529.
  • Welsh, H. & Klandt, H. (1997). International Entre preneurship and Small Business Biography, 2nd ed . Chicago: De Paul Univer s ity.
  • Westhead, P. & Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and Management Issues Associated With Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives. Family Business Review, 19 , 301 - 317.
  • Yammeesri , J. & Lodh, S. C. (2004). Is family ownerships a pain of gain to firm performance? Journal of American Academy of Business, 4 , 263 - 289.
  • Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involve ment. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 , 495 - 512.
Data source: Dialnet