El papel de la cultura en la evaluación de la felicidad entre países. Una aproximación fsQCA.

  1. Torres Peña, Francisco José 1
  2. Torres-Ruiz, Francisco José 1
  3. Vega-Zamora, Manuela 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

ISSN: 1988-9046

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 2

Páginas: 276-291

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17561/REE.N2.2022.7121 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

La felicidad de los países tiene importantes efectos en la imagen, prestigio, captación defondos o turismo de los mismos y se elaboran rakings y modelos que intentan explicar dequé depende la misma. En este trabajo se explora la posibilidad de mejorar el modelo delWorld Happiness Report mediante dos vías: la inclusión de variables culturales y el análisis deposibles interacciones entre las variables. Para ello, se ha completado la base de datos originalcon las dimensiones culturales del conocido modelo de Hofstede, replicando los análisis deregresión originales y utilizando un analisis fsQCA. Los resultados muestran la necesidad deincluir la cultura en este tipo de estudios y la existencia de tres modelos diferentes de países conaltas puntuaciones en felicidad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barbosa, B. (2017). Happiness in marketing. In: Ripoll, R.R. (Ed.), Entornos creativos, empleados felices: Una ventaja competitiva en la gestión empresarial y territorial. Uno Editorial, Albacete, Spain. 75–90.
  • Blanchflower, D. & Oswald, A. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine. (66). 1733–1749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030
  • Bettingen, J. & Luedike, M. (2009). Can Brands Make Us Happy? A Research Framework for the Study of Brands and Their Effects on Happiness. Advances in Consumer Research. (36). 308-315.
  • Brickman, P. & Campbell, D. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society, in M. H. Apley (ed.), Adaptation-level Theory: A Symposium. New York: Academic Press. 287-302.
  • Cavalletti, B y Corsi, M. (2018). ‘‘Beyond PIB’’ Effects on National Subjective Well-Being of OECD Countries, Social Indicators Research (136). 931–966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1477-0
  • Cantril, H. (1965). Pattern of Human Concerns. New Jersey: Rutgers University.
  • De Neve, J; Ed, Diener; Louis, Tay. & Cody, Xuereb. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, and J. Sachs (eds), World happiness report.
  • De Neve, J. & Oswald, A. (2012) Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (109). 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211437109
  • Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National Accounts of Well-being. In K. C. Land, M. Sirgy, & A. C. Michalos (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. 137–157). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2421-1_7
  • Fafchamps, M. & Shilpi, F. (2008). Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption. Journal of Development Economics. (86)(1., 43–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.004
  • Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. The Academy of Management Journal (54) 2. 393-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
  • Frey, B. & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy 62(190), 207–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760500130366
  • Fromm, E. (1976). To Have or to Be? New York: Harper & Row.
  • Gough, I., & McGregor, J. (Eds.). (2007). Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511488986
  • Graham, C; Eggers, A. & Sukhtankar, S. (2004) Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. (55). 319–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.09.002
  • Graham, C. & Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness and hardship: opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. The Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
  • Headey, B; Muffels, R. & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research. (87)(1). 65–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9146-y
  • Helliwell, J; Layard, R. & Sachs, J. (2019). World Happiness Report 2018. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences, International Differences in Work-Related Values, SAGE publications: Newbury Park etc.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd Ed., SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks etc.
  • Hofstede, G. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd Ed., McGraw Hill: New York.
  • Hsieh, W & Yang, B. (2015). The pursuit of happiness: An empirical study of BLI of OECD countries, IEEE International Conference on Orange Technologies. (ICOT, DOI: 10.1109/ICOT.2015.7498481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOT.2015.7498481
  • Hwang, J. & Han, H. (2014). Examining strategies for maximizing and utilizing brand prestige in the luxury cruise industry. Tourism Management. (40). 244–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.007
  • Jorm, A. & Ryan, S. (2014). Cross-national and historical differences in subjective well-being. International Journal of Epidemiology. (43)(2). 330–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt188
  • Kahneman, D; Krueger, A; Schkade, D; Schwarz, N. & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, (94). 429–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301713
  • Kruger, S. (2018). Soul searching on the wings of my wheels: motorcyclists’ happiness. Journal of Psychology in Africa. (28)(3). 218–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2018.1475912
  • Kumar, A; Paul, J. & Starčević, S. (2021). Do brands make consumers happy? - A masstige theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. (58). 102318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102318
  • Labroo, A. & Patrick, V. (2009). Psychological distancing: why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research. (35)(5). 800–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/593683
  • Layard & Richard (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science (New York: Penguin Press).
  • Loureiro, S. & Cunha, N. (2017). Wine prestige and experience in enhancing relationship quality and outcomes. International Journal of Wine Business Research. (29)(4). 434–456. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-04-2017-0033
  • Lu, L. & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: Individual oriented and social oriented SWB, Journal of Happiness Studies. (5). 265-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-8789-5
  • Noll, H. & Weick, S. (2015). Consumption expenditures and subjective well-being: empirical evidence from Germany. International Review of Economics. (62)(2). 101–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0219-3
  • Pappas, I. & Woodside, A. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management. (58). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
  • Paul, J. (2019). Masstige model and measure for brand management. European management journal. (37)(3). 299–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.07.003
  • Peters, M; Flink, I; Boersma, K & Linton, S; (2010). Manipulating optimism: can imagining the best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? Journal of Positive Psychology. (5)(3). 204–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003790963
  • Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (Illustrated ed.). University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
  • Schmitt, B; Brakus, J. & Zarantonello, L. (2014). The current state and future of brand experience. Journal of Brand Management. (21)(9). 727–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2014.34
  • Schnebelen, S. & Bruhn, M. (2018). An appraisal framework of the determinants and consequences of brand happiness. Psychology & Marketing. (35)(2). 101–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21073.
  • Stanca, L. & Veenhoven, R. (2015). Consumption and happiness: an introduction. International Review of Economics. (62)(2). 91–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-015-0236-x
  • Steptoe, A; Deaton, A. & Stone, A. (2015). Subjective well-being, health, and aging. Lancet. (385). 640–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0
  • Tonikyan, M. & Stepanyan, L. (2018). The population’s happiness and safety as predictors of the country’s economic development. Modern Psychology, nº 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46991/SBMP/2018.1.2.131
  • Tiberius, V. (2004). Cultural differences and philosophical accounts of wellbeing, Journal of Happiness Studies (5). 293–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-8791-y
  • Uchida, Y; Norasakkunkit V. & Kitayama S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence, Journal of Happiness Studies. (5). 223–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-8785-9
  • Van, B. (2005). Experientialism, materialism, and the pursuit of happiness. Review General of Psychology. (9)(2). 132–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.132
  • Wang, H; Cheng, Z. & Smyth, R. (2019). Consumption and happiness. The journal of Development Studies. (55)(1). 120–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1371294
  • Welsch, H. (2007). Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics. (62). 544–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.017
  • Zhang, J. & Xiong, Y. (2015). Effects of multifaceted consumption on happiness in life: a case study in Japan based on an integrated approach. International Review of Economics. (62)(2). 143–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-015-0225-0