Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje en niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bensousan, Y. (2002). The Effectivenness of Mediation on Three subtest of the Application of Cognitive Function Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. Unpublished Master´s Thesis, Touro College, NewYork.
• Bishop, D. V. M. (1992). The underlying nature of specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology y Psychiatry, 33, 3-66.
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). What causes Specific Language Impairment in children? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 217-221.
• Botting, N. (2005). Non-verbal cognitive development and language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46(3), 317–326.
• Brooks, N. D. (1997). An exploratory study into the cognitive modifiability of pre-school children using dynamic assessment. Unpublished Master´s Thesis: University of Newcstle-Upon-Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
• Calero, M. D., Robles-Bello, M. A., Márquez, J., y de la Osa, P. (2009). EHPAP: Evaluación de Habilidades y Potencial de Aprendizaje para Preescolares. Editorial EOS.
• Carballo, G. (2012). Guía para la evaluación del TEL: algunas consideraciones. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología. doi:10.1016/j. rlfa.2012.03.004
• Contreras, M.C. y Soriano, M. (2007). La morfología flexiva en el trastorno específico del lenguaje y en la deprivación sociocultural. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 27(3), 110-117.
• Dockrell, J. E. (2001) Assessing language skills in pre-school children. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review 6(2), 74-83.
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. y Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers; The learning potential assessment device, theory, and techniques. Baltimore. MD: University Park Press.
• Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F. y Peña, E. (2001). Dynamic Assessment of Diverse Children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 212- 224. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2001/019)
• Hasson, N. y Joffe, V. (2007). The case for Dynamic Assessment in speech and language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23(1), 9–25. doi: 10.1177/0265659007072142
• Hasson, N. y Botting, N. (2010). Dynamic assessment of children with language impairments: A pilot study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 249-272. doi: 10.1177/0265659009349982
• Hasson, N., Dodd, B. y Botting, N. (2012). Dynamic assessment of Sentence Structure (DASS): design and evaluation of a novel procedure for the assessment of syntax in children with language impairments. International Journal of Language and communication disorder. Early view. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00108.x
• Hwa-Froelich, D. A. y Matsuo, H. (2005). Vietnamese Children and language-Based Processing Tasks. Language, Speech y Hearing Services in Schools, 36 (3), 230-244. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/023)
• Haywood, H. C. y Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications. Cambridge University Press.
• Haywood, H. C. y Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and Challenges in Dynamic Assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 40-63.
• Haywood, H. C. y Wingenfeld, S. (1992a). The Learning test Concept: Origins, State of the Art and Trends. In H. C. Haywood y D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive Assessment (pp. 64-93). NY: Springer-Verlag.
• Haywood, H. C. y Wingenfeld, S. (1992b) Interactive Assessment as a Research Tool. The Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 235-268. doi: 10.1177/002246699202600303
• Hill, E. L. (2001). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 149-171.
• Jiménez, M. I. (2006). Adaptación al castellano de la Escala de Aplicación de Funciones Cognitivas (ACFS). Memoria para optar a la DEA, Facultad de Psicología de Granada, Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico. Universidad de Granada.
• Larsen, J. A. y Nippold, M. A. (2007). Morphological Analysis in School-Age Children: Dynamic Assessment of a Word Learning Strategy. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 201-212. doi:10.1044/0161- 1461(2007/021)
• Law, J. y Camilleri, B. (2007). Dynamic assessment and its application to children with speech and language learning difficulties. Advances in Speech– Language Pathology, 9(4), 271-272.
• Laws, G. y Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down Syndrome and children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1324-1339.
• Levy, C. (1999). The discriminant validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A performance comparison between typically developing and special needs preschool children. Unpublished Master´s Thesis, Touro College, New York.
• Lidz, C. S. (1992). Extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment in cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 26, 325-331.
• Lidz, C. S. (2002). Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) as a basis form an alternaive approach to assessment. School Psychology International, 23(1), 68-84. doi: 10.1177/0143034302023001731
• Lidz, C. S. (2004). Assessment procedure with deaf student between the ages of for and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21(1), 59-73.
• Lidz, C. S. y Jepsen, R. H. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, Administration Manual. New York: Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Touro College.
• Lidz, C. S. y Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic Assessment of the evolving Cognitive Functions in Children. En E. A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev y S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky´s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 99-116). Cambrigde: Unviersity Press.
• Lidz, C. S. y Jepsen, R. H. (2003). Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS). Technical Manual. Unpublished manuscript.
• Lidz, C. S. y Macrine, S. (2001). An Algernative Approach to the Identification of Gifted Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners. School Psychology International, 22 (1), 74-94.
• Lidz, C. M. y Van der Aalsvoort, G. M. (2005). Usefulness of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with Young Children from the Netherlands. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 6, 25-44.
• Losardo, A. y Notari-Syverson, A. (2001). Alternatives Approaches to Assessing Young Children. Baltimore: Brooke Publishing.
• Malowitsky, M. (2001). Investigation of the effectiveness of the mediation portion of two subtests of the Application of Cognitive Function Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. Master´s Thesis. Touro College, New York, NY.
• Mendoza, E. (2012). La investigación actual en el Trastorno Específico del Lenguaje. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología. doi:10.1016/j. rlfa.2012.03.001
• Peña, E. (2000). Measurement of modifiability in children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 87-97. doi: 10.1177/152574010002100203
• Peña, E. (2001). Assessment of semantic knowledge: Use of feedback and clinical interviewing. Seminars in Speech and Language, 22, 51-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13865
• Peña, E., Bedore, L. y Rappazzo, C. (2003). Comparison of Spanish, English and bilingual children’s performance across semantic types. Speech-Language-Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 5-16. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2003/001)
• Peña, E., Gillam, R., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C. y Sabel, T. (2006). Dynamic assessment of children from culturally diverse backgrounds: Applications to narrative assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research. 49, 1-21. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/074)
• Peña, E., Iglesias, A. y Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children’s word learning ability. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 10, 138-154. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/014)
• Peña, E. y Mendez-Perez, A. (2006). Individualistic and collectivistic approaches to language learning. Zero to Three, 27, 34-41.
• Peña, E. y Quinn, R. (2003). Developing effective collaborative teams in speech language pathology. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24, 53-63. doi: 10.1177/15257401030240020201
• Peña, E., Spaulding, T. y Plante, E. (2006). The composition of normative groups in diagnostic decision making: Shooting ourselves in the foot. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 15, 247-254. doi:10.1044/1058- 0360(2006/023)
• Pérez. P. y Salmerón, T. (2006). Desarrollo de la comunicación y del lenguaje: indicadores de preocupación. Revista Pediatría de Atención Primaria, 8, 679-693.
• Restrepo, H.A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Blake, J., Neuharth-Pritchett, S., Craner, S. E. y Ruston, H.P. (2006). Performance on the PPVT–III and the EVT: Applicability of the Measures with African American and European American Preschool Children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37(1), 17-27. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/003)
• Shamir, A. y Lazerowitz, T. (2007). Peer mediation intervention for scaffolding self-regulated learning among children with learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(3), 255-273. doi:10.1080/08856250701430786
• Shurin, R. (1999). Concurrent and discriminant validity assessment procedure with special needs and typical preschool children. Unpublished Master´s Thesis. Touro College. New York. NY.
• Swanson, H. L. y Howard, C. B. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does Dynamic Assessment Help in the Classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(1), 17-34. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4126971
• Van der Lely, H. (2005). Domain-Specific cognitive systems: insight from grammatical-SLI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 53-59.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Grijalbo.