Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje en niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje

  1. Robles Bello, María Auxiliadora
  2. Sánchez Teruel, David
  3. Valencia Naranjo, Nieves
Revista:
Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes

ISSN: 2340-8340

Any de publicació: 2015

Volum: 2

Número: 1

Pàgines: 19-24

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes

Resum

Assessment of learning potential in children with specific language impairment. Although the term Specific Language Impairment (SLI) has been questioned, especially due to the specific component, the reality is that its current use is widespread, even though sometimes people resort to other denominations, such as developmental language disorder. The main purpose of this study is to determine the profile of two groups of children with SLI and evaluate their learning potential. This article describes a study in which a scale to assess learning potential is used, which is applied to 20 preschool children with specific language impairment, named by their teachers and used as a control group, and 32 with specific language impairment that receive the assessment procedure for learning potential (experimental group). The results showed that there were no significant differences in the pretest situation between the two groups in all of the subscales, and regarding the second aim we saw that the experimental group improved significantly in visual memory, sequential pattern completion, verbal planning and perspective taking, whereas in the control group there were no significant differences.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Bensousan, Y. (2002). The Effectivenness of Mediation on Three subtest of the Application of Cognitive Function Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. Unpublished Master´s Thesis, Touro College, NewYork.
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1992). The underlying nature of specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology y Psychiatry, 33, 3-66.
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). What causes Specific Language Impairment in children? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 217-221.
  • Botting, N. (2005). Non-verbal cognitive development and language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46(3), 317–326.
  • Brooks, N. D. (1997). An exploratory study into the cognitive modifiability of pre-school children using dynamic assessment. Unpublished Master´s Thesis: University of Newcstle-Upon-Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
  • Calero, M. D., Robles-Bello, M. A., Márquez, J., y de la Osa, P. (2009). EHPAP: Evaluación de Habilidades y Potencial de Aprendizaje para Preescolares. Editorial EOS.
  • Carballo, G. (2012). Guía para la evaluación del TEL: algunas consideraciones. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología. doi:10.1016/j. rlfa.2012.03.004
  • Contreras, M.C. y Soriano, M. (2007). La morfología flexiva en el trastorno específico del lenguaje y en la deprivación sociocultural. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 27(3), 110-117.
  • Dockrell, J. E. (2001) Assessing language skills in pre-school children. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review 6(2), 74-83.
  • Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. y Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers; The learning potential assessment device, theory, and techniques. Baltimore. MD: University Park Press.
  • Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F. y Peña, E. (2001). Dynamic Assessment of Diverse Children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 212- 224. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2001/019)
  • Hasson, N. y Joffe, V. (2007). The case for Dynamic Assessment in speech and language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23(1), 9–25. doi: 10.1177/0265659007072142
  • Hasson, N. y Botting, N. (2010). Dynamic assessment of children with language impairments: A pilot study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 249-272. doi: 10.1177/0265659009349982
  • Hasson, N., Dodd, B. y Botting, N. (2012). Dynamic assessment of Sentence Structure (DASS): design and evaluation of a novel procedure for the assessment of syntax in children with language impairments. International Journal of Language and communication disorder. Early view. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00108.x
  • Hwa-Froelich, D. A. y Matsuo, H. (2005). Vietnamese Children and language-Based Processing Tasks. Language, Speech y Hearing Services in Schools, 36 (3), 230-244. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/023)
  • Haywood, H. C. y Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  • Haywood, H. C. y Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and Challenges in Dynamic Assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 40-63.
  • Haywood, H. C. y Wingenfeld, S. (1992a). The Learning test Concept: Origins, State of the Art and Trends. In H. C. Haywood y D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive Assessment (pp. 64-93). NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Haywood, H. C. y Wingenfeld, S. (1992b) Interactive Assessment as a Research Tool. The Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 235-268. doi: 10.1177/002246699202600303
  • Hill, E. L. (2001). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 149-171.
  • Jiménez, M. I. (2006). Adaptación al castellano de la Escala de Aplicación de Funciones Cognitivas (ACFS). Memoria para optar a la DEA, Facultad de Psicología de Granada, Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico. Universidad de Granada.
  • Larsen, J. A. y Nippold, M. A. (2007). Morphological Analysis in School-Age Children: Dynamic Assessment of a Word Learning Strategy. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 201-212. doi:10.1044/0161- 1461(2007/021)
  • Law, J. y Camilleri, B. (2007). Dynamic assessment and its application to children with speech and language learning difficulties. Advances in Speech– Language Pathology, 9(4), 271-272.
  • Laws, G. y Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down Syndrome and children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1324-1339.
  • Levy, C. (1999). The discriminant validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A performance comparison between typically developing and special needs preschool children. Unpublished Master´s Thesis, Touro College, New York.
  • Lidz, C. S. (1992). Extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment in cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 26, 325-331.
  • Lidz, C. S. (2002). Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) as a basis form an alternaive approach to assessment. School Psychology International, 23(1), 68-84. doi: 10.1177/0143034302023001731
  • Lidz, C. S. (2004). Assessment procedure with deaf student between the ages of for and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21(1), 59-73.
  • Lidz, C. S. y Jepsen, R. H. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, Administration Manual. New York: Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Touro College.
  • Lidz, C. S. y Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic Assessment of the evolving Cognitive Functions in Children. En E. A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev y S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky´s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 99-116). Cambrigde: Unviersity Press.
  • Lidz, C. S. y Jepsen, R. H. (2003). Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS). Technical Manual. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Lidz, C. S. y Macrine, S. (2001). An Algernative Approach to the Identification of Gifted Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners. School Psychology International, 22 (1), 74-94.
  • Lidz, C. M. y Van der Aalsvoort, G. M. (2005). Usefulness of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with Young Children from the Netherlands. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 6, 25-44.
  • Losardo, A. y Notari-Syverson, A. (2001). Alternatives Approaches to Assessing Young Children. Baltimore: Brooke Publishing.
  • Malowitsky, M. (2001). Investigation of the effectiveness of the mediation portion of two subtests of the Application of Cognitive Function Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. Master´s Thesis. Touro College, New York, NY.
  • Mendoza, E. (2012). La investigación actual en el Trastorno Específico del Lenguaje. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología. doi:10.1016/j. rlfa.2012.03.001
  • Peña, E. (2000). Measurement of modifiability in children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 87-97. doi: 10.1177/152574010002100203
  • Peña, E. (2001). Assessment of semantic knowledge: Use of feedback and clinical interviewing. Seminars in Speech and Language, 22, 51-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13865
  • Peña, E., Bedore, L. y Rappazzo, C. (2003). Comparison of Spanish, English and bilingual children’s performance across semantic types. Speech-Language-Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 5-16. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2003/001)
  • Peña, E., Gillam, R., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C. y Sabel, T. (2006). Dynamic assessment of children from culturally diverse backgrounds: Applications to narrative assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research. 49, 1-21. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/074)
  • Peña, E., Iglesias, A. y Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children’s word learning ability. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 10, 138-154. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/014)
  • Peña, E. y Mendez-Perez, A. (2006). Individualistic and collectivistic approaches to language learning. Zero to Three, 27, 34-41.
  • Peña, E. y Quinn, R. (2003). Developing effective collaborative teams in speech language pathology. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24, 53-63. doi: 10.1177/15257401030240020201
  • Peña, E., Spaulding, T. y Plante, E. (2006). The composition of normative groups in diagnostic decision making: Shooting ourselves in the foot. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 15, 247-254. doi:10.1044/1058- 0360(2006/023)
  • Pérez. P. y Salmerón, T. (2006). Desarrollo de la comunicación y del lenguaje: indicadores de preocupación. Revista Pediatría de Atención Primaria, 8, 679-693.
  • Restrepo, H.A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Blake, J., Neuharth-Pritchett, S., Craner, S. E. y Ruston, H.P. (2006). Performance on the PPVT–III and the EVT: Applicability of the Measures with African American and European American Preschool Children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37(1), 17-27. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/003)
  • Shamir, A. y Lazerowitz, T. (2007). Peer mediation intervention for scaffolding self-regulated learning among children with learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(3), 255-273. doi:10.1080/08856250701430786
  • Shurin, R. (1999). Concurrent and discriminant validity assessment procedure with special needs and typical preschool children. Unpublished Master´s Thesis. Touro College. New York. NY.
  • Swanson, H. L. y Howard, C. B. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does Dynamic Assessment Help in the Classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(1), 17-34. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4126971
  • Van der Lely, H. (2005). Domain-Specific cognitive systems: insight from grammatical-SLI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 53-59.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet