La evaluación del impacto ambiental en el esperado acuerdo para la gobernanza de la biodiversidad marina fuera de la jurisdicción nacional y su previsible aplicación a las tecnologías para la obtención de energía renovable marina

  1. Soria Rodríguez, Carlos 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
ACDI - Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional

ISSN: 2027-1131,  2145-4493

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 14

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.11715 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: ACDI - Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional

Resumen

The environmental impact assessment (EIA) is one of the key elements of the expected international legally binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, which is currently under negotiation. Considering that marine renewable energy (MRE) technologies are increasingly being developed in areas further away from the coast and that their development may have negative environmental impacts on these ecosystems, this study analyses the regulation of the EIA in the expected agreement, its foreseeable application to MRE technologies as well as provides possible suggestions for strengthening environmental protection.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bergström, Lena et al. “Effects of offshore wind farms on marine wildlife – a generalized impact assessment”. Environmental Research Letters9, no. 3 (2014), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034012
  • Birnie, Patricia, Alan Boyle y Catherine Redgwell. International Law and the Environment Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Boyle, Alan. “The Environmental Jurisprudence of the International Tri-bunal for the Law of the Sea.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 22, no. 3 (2007): 369-381.
  • Chang, Yen-Chiang. “Marine Renewable Energy–The Essential Legal Considerations.” Journal of World Energ y Law and Business 8, (2015): 26-44.
  • Decision VIII/28 of the cop8 to the cbd, unep/cbd/cop/8/31, 324 -344.
  • Parlamento y Consejo Europeos. Directiva 2014/52/UE, por la que se modifica la Directiva 2011/92/UE, relativa a la evaluación de las repercusiones de determinados proyectos públicos y privados sobre el medio ambiente (16 abril 2014).
  • Galea, Francesca. “A Legal Regime for the Exploration and Exploitation of Offshore Renewable Energy.” Ocean Yearbook 25, (2011): 101-129.
  • Garel, Erwan et al. “Applicability of the “Frame of Reference” approach for environmental monitoring of offshore renewable energy projects.” Journal of Environmental Management 141, (2014): 16 -28.
  • Gatusso, Jean-Pierre et al. “Ocean Solutions to Address Climate Change and Its Effects on Marine Ecosystems.” Frontiers in Marine Science5, no. 337 (2018), 1-18.
  • Gjerde, Kristina M. et al. “Protecting Earth’s Last Conservation Fron-tier: Scientific, Management and Legal Priorities for mpas Beyond National Boundaries.” Aquatic conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 26, no. 2 (2016), 45-60.
  • Goodale, M. Wing y Anita Milman. “Cumulative Adverse Effects of Offshore Wind Energy Development on Wildlife.” Journal of En-vironmental Planning and Management 59, no. 1 (2016), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.973483
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C. Summary for policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018). https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2022/06/SPM_version_report_LR.pdf
  • Juste Ruiz, José y Mireia Castillo Daudí. La protección del medio ambiente en el ámbito internacional y en la Unión Europea. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2014.
  • Long, Ronán. “Harnessing Offshore Wind Energy: Legal Challenges and Policy Conundrums in the European Union.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 29, no. 4 (2014), 690-715.
  • Matz-Lück, Nele. “Framework Conventions as a Regulatory Tool.” Goettingen Journal of International Law 1, no. 3 (2009), 439-458.
  • McDonald, Sarah y David L. VanderZwaag. “Renewable Ocean Energy and the International Law and Policy, Seascape: Global Currents, Regional Surges.” Ocean Yearbook 29 (2015): 299-326.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu). Protocolo sobre Evaluación Estratégica del Medio Ambiente de la Convención sobre la Evalua-ción del Impacto Ambiental en un Contexto Transfronterizo 2685 unts 14 0.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu). Further Revised Draft Text of an Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, mayo 30, 2022. https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/igc_5_-_further_revised_draft_text_final.pdf
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu), Asamblea General. Resolución sobre instrumento internacional jurídicamente vinculante en el marco de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar relativo a la conservación y el uso sostenible de la diversidad biológica marina de las zonas situadas fuera de la jurisdicción nacional, A/RES/72/249, enero 19, 2018. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N17/468/81/PDF/N1746881.pdf?OpenElement
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu). Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar.Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu). Convención sobre la Diversidad Biológica, 1760 unts 79.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu). Convenio sobre la Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental en un Contexto Transfronterizo, 1989 unts 309.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu). Convenio sobre la protección del medio marino del Atlántico Nordeste, 2354 unts 67.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas (onu), Secretaría General. Los océanos y el derecho del mar, A/67/79, abril 4, 2012.
  • Oude Elferink, Alex G. “Environmental Impact Assessment in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 27, (2012): 449-480.
  • Possner, Anna y Ken Caldeira. “Geophysical potential for wind energy over the open oceans.” Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, no. 43 (2017) 11338-11343.
  • Soria-Rodríguez, Carlos. “The European environmental regulation of marine renewable energies.” r eciel 29, (2020), 95-106.Soria-Rodríguez, Carlos. “The International Regulation for the Protection of the Environment in the Development of Marine Renewable Energy in the eu.” r eciel 30 (2021), 46-60.
  • Tanaka, Yoshifumi. “Principles of international marine environmental law.” En Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law, editado por Rosemary Rayfuse, 31-56. Edward Elgar, 2015.
  • Tiller, Rachel, Elizabeth de Santo, Elizabeth Mendenhall y Elizabeth Nyman. “The once and future treaty: towards a new regime for biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction.” Marine Policy99, (2019): 239-242.
  • Wright, Glen. “Regulating marine renewable energy development: a preli-minary assessment of uk permitting processes.” Underwater Technolog y32, no. 1 (2014): 39-50.
  • Wright, Glen, Julian Rochette, Kristina Gjerde e Isabel Seeger. “The long and winding road: negotiating a treaty for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction.” iddri Studies 82, no. 08/18 (2018): 31-40.
  • Jurisprudencia
  • International Court of Justice (icj). Gabčíkovo-Nag ymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment. icj R e p o r t s 19 97.International Court of Justice (icj). Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), Judgment, abril 20, 2010. icj Rep or ts 2010.
  • International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. mox Plant (Ireland v. Uni-ted Kingdom) Provisional measures, Order, diciembre 3, 2001, itlosRepor ts 2001.Permanent Court of Arbitration. South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), Award, julio 12, 2016, Case no. 2013-19.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet