Procedimiento del cálculo de la potencia nominal de un generador fotovoltaicoColaboración con el XXIII Simposio Peruano de Energía Solar

  1. Calsi Silva, Brando Xavier 1
  2. Angulo Abanto, José Rubén 1
  3. Conde Mendoza, Luis Ángel 1
  4. Grieseler, Rolf 1
  5. Guerra Torres, Jorge Andrés 1
  6. De la Casa Higueras, Juan 2
  7. Emilio Muñoz Cerón
  8. Palomino Töfflinger, Jan Amaru 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Ciencias, Sección de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Perú.
  2. 2 Grupo IDEA, Departamento de Electrónica, Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, España.
Journal:
TECNIA

ISSN: 2309-0413,  0375-7765

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 30

Issue: 1

Pages: 22-26

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21754/TECNIA.V30I1.834 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: TECNIA

Abstract

The nominal power of a photovoltaic system is a useful parameter in the determination of the current state of a photovoltaic generator. In the present work, the procedure proposed by Martínez-Moreno was followed, which is based on the Osterwald model. During the application of the procedure, a hysteresis effect was observed to a different extent throughout the experimental campaign. The corrected power versus irradiance values differed during the day, even when the irradiance and temperature of the module were similar. This led to an uncertainty in the inclusion of all the data. Therefore, the addition of a filter of the data is sought in the procedure of the estimation of the nominal power, as a complement to that proposed by Martinez-Moreno in an attempt to clarify the calculation in generators that presents this non-linear behavior.

Bibliographic References

  • [1] M. M. Fouad, L. A. Shihata, and E. S. I. Morgan, “An integrated review of factors influencing the performance of photovoltaic panels,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 80, no. July 2016, pp. 1499–1511, 2017.
  • [2] F. M. Zaihidee, S. Mekhilef, M. Seyedmahmoudian, and B. Horan, “Dust as an unalterable deteriorative factor affecting PV panel’s efficiency: Why and how,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 65, pp. 1267–1278, 2016.
  • [3] R. García, M. Torres-Ramírez, E. Muñoz-Cerón, J. de la Casa, and J. Aguilera, “Spectral characterization of the solar resource of a sunny inland site for flat plate and concentrating PV systems,” Renew. Energy, vol. 101, pp. 1169–1179, 2017.
  • [4] M. Mussard and M. Amara, “Performance of solar photovoltaic modules under arid climatic conditions: A review,” Sol. Energy, vol. 174, no. July, pp. 409–421, 2018.
  • [5] M. M. D. Afonso, P. C. M. Carvalho, F. L. M. Antunes, and J. J. Hiluy Filho, “Deterioration and performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules in a semi-arid climate,” Renew. Energy Power Qual. J., no. March, pp. 424–428, 2017.
  • [6] O. C. R., “Translation of device performance measurements to reference conditions,” Sol. Cells, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 269–279, 1986.
  • [7] U. B. Filik, T. Filik, and O. N. Gerek, “A hysteresis model for fixed and sun tracking solar PV power generation systems,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 3, 2018.
  • [8] M. R. Martiínez-Moreno F., Lorenzo E., Muñoz J., “On the testing of large PV arrays,” Prog. Photovolt Res. Appl., vol. 20, no. March 2011, pp. 11–33, 2012.
  • [9] T. Huld, R. Müller, and A. Gambardella, “A new solar radiation database for estimating PV performance in Europe and Africa,” Sol. Energy, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1803–1815, 2012.
Data source: Dialnet