The relationship between learning potential in preschool children and their cognitive abilities

  1. Francisca Barba-Colmenero 1
  2. María A. Robles-Bello 1
  3. Nieves Valencia-Naranjo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
Psicología educativa

ISSN: 1135-755X

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 30

Número: 1

Páginas: 11-18

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5093/PSED2023A16 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicología educativa

Resumen

El potencial de aprendizaje se puede utilizar para evaluar y orientar la acción en diversas poblaciones en entornos educativos modernos. Este estudio analiza la relación entre la escala de evaluación dinámica EHPAP y las habilidades cognitivas (desarrollo lingüístico, habilidades cognitivas específicas y funcionamiento ejecutivo) en niños en edad preescolar con un desarrollo típico. Los modelos de regresión lineal indican que las habilidades cognitivas de los niños forman parte de la predicción de su desempeño independiente en tareas antes y después de la mediación. Las habilidades que formaban parte de las predicciones estaban relacionadas con el desarrollo lingüístico general, las funciones cognitivas específicas y el funcionamiento ejecutivo. La edad como factor predictivo solo contribuye a la planificación verbal. Este estudio analiza la contribución de estas variables en diferentes escalas EHPAP.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguinaga, G., Armentina, M. L., Fraile, A, Olangua, P., & Uriz, N. (2005). Prueba de Lenguaje Oral de Navarra Revisada (PLON-R) [Oral Language Test of Navarra Revised -PLON-R]. TEA Ediciones.
  • Bausela-Herreras, E., & Luque-Cuenca, T. (2017). Evaluación Conductual de la Función Ejecutiva-Versión Infantil (BRIEF-P, versión española): fiabilidad y validez [Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive FunctionPreschool Version (BRIEF-P, Spanish adaptation): Reliability and validity]. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 7(3), 2811-2822.
  • Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007
  • Calero, M. D., Carles, R., Mata, S., & Navarro, E. (2010). Diferencias en habilidades y conducta entre grupos de preescolares de alto y bajo rendimiento escolar [Differences in abilities and behavior between groups of preschoolers with high and low school performance]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 16(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.16.2.4137
  • Calero García, M., Robles Bello, M., & García Martín, M. B. (2010). Habilidades cognitivas, conducta y potencial de aprendizaje en preescolares con síndrome de Down [Cognitive abilities, behavior, and learning potential in preschoolers with Down syndrome]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(1), 87-110. https:// doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i20.1400
  • Calero, M. D., Robles, M. A., Márquez J., & Osa P. (2009). Evaluación de Habilidades y Potencial de Aprendizaje para Preescolares [Assessment of Skills and Learning Potential for Preschoolers]. Instituto de Orientación Educativa EOS.
  • Carles Gassín, R. (2012). Potencial de aprendizaje y adaptación al contexto educativo. La prevención de problemas escolares en niños inmigrantes (tesis doctoral) [Learning potential and adaptation to the educational context. The prevention of School Problems in Immigrant Children. Doctoral dissertation]. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/21762
  • Carles Gassin. R., Mata, S., Calero, M. D., López-Rubio, S., Vives, C., & Navarro, E. (2011). Variables predictoras de la ejecución escolar y cognitiva en preescolares inmigrantes [Predictors of school and cognitive performance in immigrant preschoolers]. In F. J. García Castaño & N. Kressova (Coords.), Actas del I Congreso Internacional sobre Migraciones en Andalucía. Proceedings of the I International Congress on Migrations in Andalusia] (pp. 93- 105). Instituto de Migraciones. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4031395
  • Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607. https://doi.org/10.17507/ jltr.0903.20
  • Dicataldo, R., & Roch, M. (2021). Direct and indirect pathways of variation in length of exposure to the majority language, cognitive and language skills in preschoolers’ listening narrative comprehension. Children, 8(8), Article 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8080636
  • Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2019). Exploring L2 learning potential through computerized dynamic assessment. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 51-78. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2019.92190
  • Emen, M., & Aslan, D. (2019). The relationship between perspective taking skills and language development in preschool children. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 25-42.
  • Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Jensen, M., Kaniel, S., Tzuriel, D., Shachar, N. B., & Mintzker, Y. (1986). Learning potential assessment. Special Services in the Schools, 2(2-3), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v02n02_07
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Forsberg, A., Adams, E. J., & Cowan, N. (2022). The development of visual memory. In T. F. Brady & W. A. Bainbridge (Eds.), Visual memory (1st ed., pp. 298-314). Routledge.
  • Frank de Verthelyi, R. (2001). Las inteligencias y la evaluación: interrogantes y tendencias actuales [Intelligences and evaluation: Questions and current trends]. Psicodebate, 1, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.18682/ pd.v1i0.527
  • Frischkorn, G. T., von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2022). Individual differences in updating are not related to reasoning ability and working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(6), 1341-1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001141
  • Giola, G. A., Espy, K. A., & Isquith, P. K. (2016). BRIEF-P. Evaluación Conductual de la Función Ejecutiva [BRIEF-P. Behavioral Assessment of Executive Function]. TEA Ediciones.
  • Hällström, E., Myr, J., & Hallin, A. E. (2021). Narrative retells in Swedish school-aged children – a clinical pilot study. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 48(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2021.19668 33
  • Haywood, H., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kushki, A., Rahimi, M., & Davin, K. J. (2022). Dynamic assessment of argumentative writing: Mediating task response. Assessing Writing, 52, Article 100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100606
  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14(4), 389-433. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1
  • Laurent, A., Smithson, L., & Nicoladis, E. (2020). Gesturers tell a story creatively. Non-gesturers tell it like it happened. Language Learning and Development, 16(3), 292- 308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441 .2020.1745074
  • Lukovi , S., Marinkovi , B., & Zotovi Kosti , M. (2022). The zone of actual and the zone of proximal development measured through preschool dynamic assessment as predictors of later school performance – a longitudinal study. Psihologica, 55(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.2298/ PSI200914004L
  • McCoy, D. C. (2019). Measuring young children’s executive function and self-regulation in classrooms and other real-world settings. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 22(1), 63-74. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10567-019-00285-1
  • Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8-14. https://doi. org/10.1177/0963721411429458
  • Muñoz-Sandoval, A., Woodcock, R.W., MGrew K.S., & Mather, N. (2005). Bateria III. Woodcock-Muñoz. Pruebas de habilidad cognitiva y pruebas de aprovechamiento [Battery III. Woodcock-Munoz. Cognitive Ability Tests and Achievement Tests]. Riverside Publishing.
  • Musci, M. C., & Brenlla, M. E. (2017). La evaluación dinámica y las potencialidades para el aprendizaje: recorrido conceptual y perspectivas de desarrollo [Dynamic assessment and learning potential: Conceptual overview and development perspectives]. Investigaciones en Psicología 22(1), 45-56. http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/ handle/uncomaid/15702
  • Orellana, C. I., Wada, R., & Gillam, R. B. (2019). The use of dynamic assessment for the diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: A metaanalysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1298-1317. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0202
  • Paniagua-Esquivel, C., & Quirós-Ramírez, A. (2020). The collaborative interactions of preschool children in solving problems in a collaborative virtual environment. Interacciones, 6(1), Article e196. https://doi. org/10.24016/2020.v6n1.196
  • Patterson, J. L., Rodríguez, B. L., & Dale, P. S. (2020). Dynamic assessment language tasks and the prediction of performance on year-end language skills in preschool dual language learners. American Journal of SpeechLanguage Pathology, 29(3), 1226-1240. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ AJSLP-19-00120
  • Petersen, D. B., Gragg, S. L., & Spencer, T. D. (2018). Predicting reading problems 6 years into the future: Dynamic assessment reduces bias and increases classification accuracy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 875-888. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_ LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0021
  • Plym, J., Lahti-Nuuttila, P., Smolander, S., Arkkila, E., & Laasonen, M. (2021). Structure of cognitive functions in monolingual preschool children with typical development and children with developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 64(8), 3140-3158. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00546
  • Puertas González, J. A., Ruiz Castilla, M., Fresneda López, M. D., & Godoy García, J. F. (2019). Eficacia de un programa de entrenamiento para padres destinado a mejorar la comunicación oral y la conducta de sus hijos: un estudio preliminar [Efficacy of a training program for parents aimed at improving their children’s oral communication and behavior: A preliminary study]. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 8(2), 107- 127. https://doi.org/10.5209/rlog.62544
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2021). El papel del profesor en el desarrollo de habilidades cognitivas complejas en personas jóvenes [The teacher’s role in developing higher level thinking skills in young people]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 79(278), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.22550/ REP79-1-2021-01
  • Sacheli, L. M., Arcangeli, E., & Paulesu, E. (2018). Evidence for a dyadic motor plan in joint action. Scientific Report, 8, Article 5027. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23275-9
  • Sacheli, L. M., Meyer, M., Hartstra, E., Bekkering, H., & Hunnius, S. (2019). How preschoolers and adults represent their joint action partner’s behavior. Psychological Research, 83(5), 863-877. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00426-017-0929-8
  • Schmerse, D. (2020). Preschool quality effects on learning behavior and later achievement in Germany: Moderation by socioeconomic status. Child Development, 91(6), 2237-2254. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cdev.13357
  • Shaul, S., & Schwartz, M. (2014). The role of the executive functions in school readiness among preschool-age children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 749-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11145-013-9470-3
  • Shobeiry, M. (2021). The effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian IELTS students’ metacognitive awareness for reading strategy and reading development. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 79, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLLL/79-02
  • Stad, F. E., Wiedl, K. H., Vogelaar, B., Bakker, M., & Resing, W. C. M. (2019). The role of cognitive flexibility in young children’s potential for learning under dynamic testing conditions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0379-8
  • Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/249797857
  • Touw, K., Vogelaar, B., Thissen, F., Rovers, S., & Resing, W. (2020). Progression and individual differences in children’s series completion after dynamic testing. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12272
  • Traverso, L., Viterbori, P., Malagoli, Ch., & Usai, M. C. (2020). Distinct inhibition dimensions differentially account for working memory performance in 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 55, Article 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100909
  • Tsesmeli, S. N., & Stoumpou, K. (2021). Dynamic assessment in spelling and morphological awareness in Greek: The case of a transparent orthography. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 117, Article 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104047
  • Tzuriel, D., & Groman, T. (2017). Dynamic assessment of figurative language of children in the autistic spectrum: The relation to some cognitive and language aspects. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16(1), 38-63. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.16.1.38
  • Valencia-Naranjo, N., & Robles-Bello, M. A. (2017). Learning potential and cognitive abilities in preschool boys with fragile X and Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.001
  • Valencia-Naranjo, N., & Robles-Bello, M. A. (2020). Dynamic assessment in preschoolers with Down syndrome and nonspecific intellectual disability. Psicología Educativa, 26(2), 101-107. https://doi. org/10.5093/psed2020a9
  • Venkatraman, K., & Thiruvalluvan, V. (2021). Development of narratives in Tamil-speaking preschool children: A task comparison study. Heliyon, 7(7), Article e07641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07641
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Hu, N. (2021). Development of categorizing ability in preschoolers. Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 615. https://doi. org/10.2991/assehr.k.211220.434
  • Wiedl, K. H., Mata, S., Waldorf, M., & Calero, M. D. (2014). Dynamic testing with native and migrant preschool children in Germany and Spain, using the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2014.07.003
  • Wolf, S., & McCoy, D. C. (2019). The role of executive function and socialemotional skills in the development of literacy and numeracy during preschool: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 22(4), Article e12800. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12800
  • Wongupparaj, P., Kumari, V., & Morris, R. G. (2015). The relation between a multicomponent working memory and intelligence: The roles of central executive and short-term storage functions. Intelligence, 53, 166-180. https://doi.org/10/gd3vsr
  • Zanchi, P., & Zampini, L. (2021). The narrative competence task. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(1), 15-22. https://doi. org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000569
  • Zarei, A., & Khojasteh, A. (2020). Models of dynamic assessment affecting the learning of English lexical collocations. Journal of Language Horizons, 4(2), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2020.29463.1229 (ikiu. ac.ir).
  • Zippert, E., Clayback, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2019). Not just IQ: Patterning predicts preschoolers’ math knowledge beyond fluid reasoning. Journal of Cognition & Development, 20(5), 752-771. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15248372.2019.1658587