Las partes interesadas en el desarrollo turístico de un territorio. Análisis de casos en Ecuador

  1. Pulido-Fernández, Juan Ignacio 1
  2. López-Molina, Diana 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España


  2. 2 Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador
Investigaciones Turísticas

ISSN: 2174-5609

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Nummer: 26

Seiten: 251-273

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.14198/INTURI.23156 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Andere Publikationen in: Investigaciones Turísticas


The importance of social capital for the tourism development of an area is increasingly recognized in the scientific literature. A tourist destination is an ecosystem composed of a series of actors (stakeholders) who interact with each other, and this level of interaction is directly related to the development of tourist destinations. This research aims to analyze the stakeholders in the tourism development of four cities in Ecuador. For this purpose, the methodology is focused on identifying the actors based on the levels of power, influence and urgency. The results of this study show that there are different types of stakeholders in each city, with different levels of participation, which is manifested in the degree of tourism development in these cities.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Aas, C., Ladkin, A., & Fletcher, J. (2005). Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Annals of tourism research, 32(1), 28-48.
  • Albats, E., Alexander, A., Mahdad, M., Miller, K., & Post, G. (2020). Stakeholder management in SME open innovation: interdependences and strategic actions. Journal of Business Research, 119, 291-301.
  • Ali, F., Hussain, K., Nair, V., & Nair, P. K. (2017). Stakeholders' perceptions & attitudes towards tourism development in a mature destination. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 65(2), 173-186.
  • Alvarez, M. D. (2014). Sustainability issues. In Tourism as an Instrument for Development: A Theoretical and Practical Study. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Amoako, G. K., Obuobisa-Darko, T., & Marfo, S. O. (2021). Stakeholder role in tourism sustainability: the case of Kwame Nkrumah Mausoleum and centre for art and culture in Ghana. International Hospitality Review.
  • Arriagada, I., Miranda, F., & Pávez, T. (2004). Lineamientos de acción para el diseño de programas de superación de la pobreza desde el enfoque del capital social: guía conceptual y metodológica. CEPAL.
  • Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. H. (2010). Knowledge transfer in a tourism destination: the effect of a network structure. The Service Industrial Journal, 30 (10), 1757-1771.
  • Billgren, C., & Holmén, H. (2008). Approaching reality: Comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land use policy, 25(4), 550-562.
  • Bornhorst, T., Ritchie, J. B., & Sheehan, L. (2010). Determinants of tourism success for DMOs & destinations: An empirical examination of stakeholders' perspectives. Tourism management, 31(5), 572-589.
  • Britain, G. (1995). Guidance note on how to do stakeholder analysis of aid projects and programmes. Overseas Development Administration.
  • Brugha, R., & Varvasovsky, Z. (2000). How to do (or not to do) ...A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338-345.
  • Buanes, A., Jentoft, S., Karlsen, G. R., Maurstad, A., & Søreng, S. (2004). In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning. Ocean & Coastal Management, 47(5-6), 207-223.
  • Byrd, E. T. (2007). Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tourism review.
  • Carrillo-Hidalgo, I., Casado-Montilla, J., & Pulido-Fernández, J.I. (2021). Desarrollo sostenible del oleoturismo: Un análisis de la colaboración entre actores. Revista de ciencias sociales, 27(2), 19-38.
  • Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of management review, 20(1), 92-117.
  • d'Angella, F., & Go, F. M. (2009). Tale of two cities’ collaborative tourism marketing: Towards a theory of destination stakeholder assessment. Tourism Management, 30(3), 429- 440.
  • De desarrollo, E. L. G. P., la programación, Y. L. F. Y., & EJECUCIÓN, D. P. D. E. (2017). Plan nacional de desarrollo 2017-2021 “Toda una vida”.
  • De Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E., Van Kranenburg, H., & Freeman, E. (2017). Reviewing the role of stakeholders in operational research: A stakeholder theory perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 402-410.
  • Elias, A. A., & Cavana, R. Y. (2000, December). Stakeholder analysis for systems thinking and modelling. In Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Conference paper.
  • FACULTADES A GOBIERNOS AUTONOMOS DESARROLLO ACTIVIDADES TURISTICAS. (2016, 23 de marzo). Consejo Nacional de Competencias Registro Oficial Suplemento 718 No. 0001-CNC-2016.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
  • Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management, 189-207.
  • Gass, G., Biggs, S., & Kelly, A. (1997). Stakeholders, science and decision making for povertyfocused rural mechanization research and development. World development, 25(1), 115-126.
  • Grimble, R., & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural systems, 55(2), 173-193. 1
  • Hardy, A., & Pearson, L. J. (2018). Examining stakeholder group specificity: An innovative sustainable tourism approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8, 247-258.
  • Hunjet, A., Kozina, G., & Vukovic, D. (2019). Stakeholder Dialogue in the Development of Sustainable Tourist Destinations. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 386-397.
  • Jamal, T. B., & Getz, D. (1995). Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Annals of tourism research, 22(1), 186-204.
  • Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of management review, 20(2), 404-437.
  • Khazaei, A., Elliot, S., & Joppe, M. (2015). An application of stakeholder theory to advance community participation in tourism planning: The case for engaging immigrants as fringe stakeholders. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(7), 1049-1062.
  • Martini, U., & Buffa, F. (2015). Local networks, stakeholder dynamics and sustainability in tourism. Opportunities and limits in the light of stakeholder theory and SNA. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 33(Jan-Apr), 113-130.
  • Marzuki, A., & Hay, I. (2014). Stakeholder, tourism. Encyclopedia of Tourism, 896-898. Cham Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. 319-01669-6_389-1
  • Merinero Rodríguez, R., & Zamora Acosta, E. (2009). La colaboración entre los actores turísticos en ciudades patrimoniales. Reflexiones para el análisis del desarrollo turístico.
  • Ministerio de Turismo. (2023). Visualizador de Información Turística del Ecuador.
  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886.
  • Nguyen, T. Q. T., Young, T., Johnson, P., & Wearing, S. (2019). Conceptualising networks in sustainable tourism development. Tourism Management Perspectives, 32, 100575.
  • Nilsson, P. Å. (2007). Stakeholder theory: the need for a convenor. The case of Billund. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(2), 171-184.
  • Nilsson, P. Å., & Aquino, J. (2021). The Interplay of Stakeholder Theory and Blind Spot Theory in Rural Tourism Development. Athens Journal of Tourism, 8(2), 89-106.
  • Poudel, S., Nyaupane, G. P., & Budruk, M. (2016). Stakeholders’ perspectives of sustainable tourism development: A new approach to measuring outcomes. Journal of Travel Research, 55(4), 465-480.
  • Prieto, M. (2011). Los estudios sobre turismo en Ecuador. Espacios en disputa: el turismo en Ecuador, 9-28.
  • Pulido-Fernández, J. I. (2005) Criterios para una política turística sostenible en los parques naturales de Andalucía. Sevilla, Consejería de Turismo, Comercio y Deportes.
  • Pulido-Fernández, J.I. (2010). Las partes interesadas en la gestión turística de los parques naturales andaluces. Identificación de interrelaciones e intereses. Revista de estudios regionales, (88), 147-175.
  • Robson, J., & Robson, I. (1996). From shareholders to stakeholders: critical issues for tourism marketers. Tourism management, 17(7), 533-540. 5177(96)00070-2
  • Secretaría Nacional de Planificación (2021). Plan Nacional de Oportunidades 2021, 2025
  • Shaadi Rodríguez, L. D. S., Pulido Fernández, J. I., & Rodríguez Herrera, I. M. (2018). Análisis de las Partes Interesadas en la Gestión del Turismo de Reuniones en la ciudad de Aguascalientes (México) a partir de los elementos básicos del análisis de redes.
  • Song, H., Zhu, C., & Fong, L. H. N. (2021). Exploring Residents’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Sustainable Tourism Development in Traditional Villages: The Lens of Stakeholder Theory. Sustainability, 13(23), 13032.
  • Theodoulidis, B., Diaz, D., Crotto, F., & Rancati, E. (2017). Exploring corporate social responsibility and financial performance through stakeholder theory in the tourism industries. Tourism Management, 62, 173-188.
  • Wayne Gould, R. (2012). Open innovation and stakeholder engagement. Journal of technology management & innovation, 7(3), 1-11. 27242012000300001
  • Wei, M., & Yang, R. R. (2013). A research on eco-tourism development models based on the stakeholder theory. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 291, pp. 1447-1450). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. 294.1447
  • Yang, A., & Bentley, J. (2017). A balance theory approach to stakeholder network and apology strategy. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 267-277.