Hacia una educación STEM fundamentada, factible y que responda a las críticas

  1. Marta Romero Ariza 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén, España
Revista:
Boletín ENCIC: Revista del Grupo de Investigación HUM-974

ISSN: 2530-9579

Ano de publicación: 2021

Título do exemplar: Enseñanza basada en el contexto, prácticas científicas y educación STEM: Propuestas estratégicas para promover el pensamiento crítico desde la Enseñanza de las Ciencias

Volume: 5

Número: 2

Páxinas: 101-109

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Boletín ENCIC: Revista del Grupo de Investigación HUM-974

Resumo

This paper intends to stimulate the debate about STEM education, paying special attention to the critic voices to this approach and the analysis of the research evidence provided by the specialized literature. In response to some of the criticism, a theoretical framework is presented, drawing on the specialized literature and the available evidence to discuss the appropriateness and feasibility of STEM education. Finally, the discussion is enriched from the analysis of current challenges and directions in science education, presenting the STEM approach as an opportunity to re-think the intended learning goals and the best procedures to achieve them.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ariza, M. R. (2017). Education and Responsible Research and Innovation: International perspectives. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 5(3), 6-10.
  • Ariza, M. R., Abril, A. M., y Quesada, A. (2017). Design and Evaluation of Teaching materials for Responsible Research and Innovation. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 5(3), 28-43.
  • Ariza, M. R., Abril, A. M., y Quesada, A. (2018). Empowering teachers to bring authenticity and responsive action into the science classroom. School Science Review, 100(371), 40-45.
  • Ariza, M. R., Armenteros, A. Q., y Gallego, A. M. A. (2020). Construcción de una máquina eólica: Indagar en primaria desde los nuevos estándares de ciencias. Aula de innovación educativa, (298), 31-36.
  • Ariza, M. R., Quesada, A., y Estepa, A. (2021). Promoting critical thinking through mathematics and science teacher education: the case of argumentation and graphs interpretation about climate change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1961736.
  • Ariza, M. R., Quesada, A., Abril, A. M., y Cobo, C. (2021). Changing teachers’ self- efficacy, beliefs and practices through STEAM teacher professional development. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 1-33.
  • Ariza, M. R., Quesada, A., y Abril, A. M. (2019). Realistic Contexts and Inquiry to Enhance Stem Education: In-Depht Views in Case Studies. In Inted2019 proceedings, (pp. 9954-9959).
  • Martín, T., Aguilera, D., Perales, F. J., y Vílchez, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012): A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC. National Academies Press
  • Ortiz, J., Greca, I. M., y Arriassecq, I. (2021). A Theoretical Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Science & Education, 1-22.
  • Toma, R. B., y García-Carmona, A. (2021). "De STEM nos gusta todo menos STEM": análisis crítico de una tendencia educativa de moda. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 39(1), 65-80.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet