Design of a Checklist for Evaluating Language Learning Websites

  1. Elena Moreno Fuentes 1
  2. Jesús J. Risueño Martínez 1
  1. 1 Centro Universitario SAFA Úbeda
Revista:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 30

Páginas: 23-41

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Resumen

El objetivo del presente trabajo es la creación de una herramienta que permita una evaluación exhaustiva de páginas web para el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera. Después de un profundo análisis de las distintas tendencias a la hora de evaluar sitios web, nos centraremos en definir un modelo claro basado en un conjunto de criterios que permita evaluar distintos sitios web para el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera, para finalmente presentar nuestra propia propuesta de análisis de los elementos clave de una web diseñada para tal fin en la que se incluyen una serie de ítems clave tales como el uso de multimedia, interactividad, contenido educativo y en especial, aquellos estrechamente relacionados con aspectos comunicativos tales como la comunicación a través del ordenador.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ababtain, M. A. and Khan, A. R. (2017). “Towards a Framework for Usability of Arabic-English Websites”, in Procedia Computer Science, 109: 1010-1015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procs.2017.05.448.
  • Bell, C. (1998). “Everyone’s using the web, so why aren’t we? Web design and the ESOL teacher”, in CAELL Journal, 8, 4: 8-12.
  • Barlow, M., Garret, M., Nimri, M., and Peterson, J. (2002). “Software evaluation guide”. The CALL Cookbook. (A Student Project of Rice University, Houston/Texas), available from http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~ling417/guide.html, accessed 25 August, 2015.
  • Burston, J. (2003). “Software selection: A primer on sources and evaluation”, in CALICO Journal, 21, 1: 29-40.
  • Cabrejas, A. B. (2013). “Learning English With a Social Networking Site: Exploring the Use of the Ning Site by Foreign Language Learners.” in @tic. revista d’innovació educative, 10, 1:131-138.
  • Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dragulanescu, N. (2002). “Website Quality Evaluations: Criteria and Tools”, in International Information & Library Review, 34, 3: 247-254.
  • Egbert, J., and Hanson-Smith, E. (Eds.). (1999). CALL enviroments: Research, practice and, critical issues. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
  • Gottwall, S. (2002). “Websites for Second Language Research”, in Second Language Research, 18, 1: 83-94.
  • Hampel, R. (2006). “Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment”, in ReCALL: Journal of Eurocall, 18, 1: 105-121.
  • Hampel, R., and Stickler, U. (2005). “New skills for new classrooms: training tutors to teach languages online”, in Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 4: 311-326.
  • Hubbard, P. (1988). “An integrated framework for CALL courseware evaluation”, in CALICO Journal, 6, 2: 51-72.
  • Hubbard, P. (1996). “Elements of CALL methodology: Development, evaluation and implementation”, in M. Pennington (ed.), The power of CALL. Bolsover: Athelstan, 15-33.
  • Hubbard, P., and Levy, M. (eds.). (2006). Teacher Education in CALL. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Jamieson, J., Chapelle, C., and Preiss, S. (2004). “Putting principles into practice”, in ReCALL, 16, 2: 396-415.
  • Kartal, E. (2005). “The Internet and autonomous language learning: a typology of suggested aids”, in Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4, 4: 54-58.
  • Kartal, E. (2010). “The Internet, language learning, and international dialogue: constructing online foreign language learning websites”, in Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 11, 2: 90-107.
  • Kelly, C. (2000). “Guidelines for designing a good Website for ESL students”, in The Internet TESL Journal, 6, 3, available from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Guidelines.html, accessed 29 August, 2015.
  • Kongrith, K., and Maddux, C. (2005). “Online learning as a demonstration of type II technology: second-language acquisition”, in Computers in the schools, 22, 1/2: 97-110.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., and Shield, L. (2008). “An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction”, in ReCALL, 20, 3: 271-289.
  • Kung, S. C., and Chuo, T.-W. (2002). “Students’ perceptions of English learning through ESL/ EFL websites”, in TESL-EJ (Online), 6, 1: 1-17.
  • Levy, M., and Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Murray, O., and Reagan, N. (2003). “Your online companion: ESL textbooks websites”, in ESL Magazine, 6, 3: 10-12.
  • Nelson, J. T. (1998). A system for the evaluation of ESL Websites. Thesis. Washington State University.
  • Nicholas, N., Debski, R., and Lagerberg, R. (2004). “Skryba: an online ortography teaching tool for learners from bilingual backgrounds”, in Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 3/4: 441-458.
  • Perrot. T. (2001). Grilles d’analyse. Accessed August 8, 2015, from http://flenet.unileon.es/ grilles2.html
  • Phillips, M. (1985). “Logical possibilities and classroom scenarios for the development of CALL”, in C. Brumfit, M. Phillips, and P. Skehan (eds.), Computers in English language teaching. New York: Pergamon, 25-46.
  • Richards, J., and Rodgers, T. (1982). “Method: Approach, design and procedure”, in TESOL Quarterly, 16, 2: 153-168.
  • Richards, J., and Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rifkin, B. (2003). “Criteria for the assessment of foreign language instructional software and websites”, in ADFL Bulletin, 34, 2: 53-56.
  • Sabri, M. (2010). “Evaluation d’un support numerique d’apprentissage grammatical”, in ISDM. Information Sciences for Decision Making, 37, available from http://isdm.univ-tln.fr/PDF/ isdm37/NEDEP_ISDM_Al_Sabri.pdf, accessed 25 July, 2015.
  • Smidt, E., and Hegelheimer, V. (2004). “New perspectives on CALL for second language”, in Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 5: 517-556.
  • Son, J. (2005). “Exploring and evaluating language learning websites”, in J. B. Son, and S. O’Neill (eds.), Enhancing learning and teaching: Pedagogy, technology and language. Flaxton: Post Pressed, 215-227.
  • Son, J. (2006). “Using online discussion groups in a CALL teacher training course”, in RELC Journal, 37(1), 123-135.
  • Susser, B. (2001). “A defense of checklists for software evaluation”, in ReCALL, 13, 2: 261-276.
  • Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher: A communicative approach. Rowley: Newbury House.
  • Wang, L., and Coleman, J. (2009). “A survey of Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education in China”, in ReCALL, 21, 1: 113-129.
  • Yip, F. W., and Kwan, A. (2006). “Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary”, in Educational Media International, 43, 3: 233-249.
  • Zapata, G., and Sagarra, N. (2007). “CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning”, in Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 2: 153-171.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet