Perspectivas de atención en dependencia del contexto de recuperación de información

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abad MJF, Ramos Álvarez MM, & Rosas JM (2009). Partial reinforcement and context switch effects in human predictive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 174-199. Doi: 10.1080/17470210701855561
• Amsel A (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuos reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102-119. Doi: 10.1037/h0043125
• Amsel A (1992). Frustration Theory. Canada: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511665561
• Anderson JR (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Doi: 10.4324/9781315806938
• Aristizabal JA, Ramos Álvarez MM, Callejas Aguilera JE, & Rosas JM (2016). Attention to irrelevant contexts decreases as training increases: Evidence from eye-fixations in a human predictive learning task. Behavioural Processes, 124, 66-73. Doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.12.008
• Aristizabal JA, Ramos Álvarez MM, Callejas Aguilera JE, & Rosas JM (2017). Context-switches after short acquisition lead to an increase on attention to the context in a human predictive learning task. Unpublished Manuscript. Universidad de Jaén.
• Bernal Gamboa R, Callejas Aguilera JE, Nieto J, & Rosas, JM (2013). Extinction makes conditioning time-dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 221-232. Doi: 10.1037/a0032181
• Bernal Gamboa R, Nieto J, & Rosas JM (2015). Context specificity of taste aversion is boosted by pre-exposure and conditioning with a different taste. Behavioural Processes, 120, 111-115. Doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.008
• Bernal Gamboa R, Rosas JM, & Callejas Aguilera, JE (2014). Experiencing extinction within a task makes nonextinguished information learned within a different task context-dependent. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 21, 803-808. Doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0558-1
• Bonardi C, Honey RC, & Hall G (1990). Context specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229-237. Doi: 10.3758/bf03205280
• Bouton ME (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99. Doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.80
• Bouton ME (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219-231. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.20.3.219
• Bouton ME (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In ME Bouton & MS Fanselow (Eds.), Learning, motivation and cognition: The functional behaviourism of Robert C. Bolles (pp. 385-409). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Bouton ME & Bolles RC (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10, 445-466. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2
• Bouton ME & Ricker ST (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317-324. Doi: 10.3758/bf03209840
• Bouton ME & Swartzentruber D (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333-350. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.12.4.333
• Callejas Aguilera JE, Cubillas CP, & Rosas JM (2017). Attentional instructions modulate differential context-switch effects after short and long training in human predictive learning. Unpublished Manuscript. Universidad de Jaén.
• Callejas Aguilera JE & Rosas JM (2010). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 482-494. Doi: 10.1037/a0018527
• Capaldi EJ (1967). A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In KW Spence & JT Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 1 (pp. 67-156). New York: Academic Press.
• Capaldi EJ (1994). The relation between memory and expectancy as revealed by percentage and sequence of reward investigations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 303-310. Doi: 10.3758/BF03213970
• Darby RJ & Pearce J (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143-154. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.2.143
• Delamater AR (1997). Selective reinstatement of stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 400-412. Doi: 10.3758/bf03209847
• Deroost N & Soetens E (2006). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16-30. Doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.16
• Dickinson A, Hall G, & Mackintosh NJ (1976). Surprise and the attenuation of blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 313-322. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.2.4.313
• Eich E (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 764-770. Doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.1-4.764
• Gámez AM, León SP, & Rosas JM (2016). Roles of context in acquisition of human instrumental learning: Implications for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying context-switch effects. Learning & Behavior. Doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0256-8
• García Gutiérrez A, Rosas JM, & Nelson JB (2005). Extensive interference attenuates reinstatement in human predictive judgments. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18, 240-248.
• García Gutiérrez A & Rosas JM (2003). Context change as the mechanism of reinstatement in causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 292-310. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.292
• Griffiths O & Mitchell CJ (2008). Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 626-648. Doi: 10.1037/a0013685
• Hall G & Pearce JM (1979). Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 31-42. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.1.31
• Hall G & Honey RC (1990). Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 271-278. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.16.3.271
• Hall G & Rodríguez G (2010). Attentional learning. In C Mitchell & M Le Pelley (Eds.), Attention and associative learning (pp. 41-70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Harris JA, Jones ML, Bailey GK & Westbrook RF (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in an extinction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 174-185. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.174
• Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Janowski M, Nikitina A, & Duka, T (2008). The role of attentional bias in mediating human drug-seeking behavior. Psychopharmacology, 201, 29-41. Doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1244-2
• Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Wright A, Kouvaraki M, & Duka, T (2007). The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 484-496. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.484
• Kamin LJ (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B Campbell & R Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-298). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Kaye H & Pearce JM (1984). The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 90-109. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.10.1.90
• Keene CS & Bucci DJ (2007). Automated measure of conditioned orienting behavior in rats. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 303-308. Doi: 10.3758/bf03193161
• Krechevsky I (1932). Hypotheses in rats. Psychological Review, 39, 516-532. Doi: 10.1037/h0073500
• Kruschke JK (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812-863. Doi: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1354
• Kruschke JK (2003). Attention in learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 171-175. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01254
• Le Pelley ME (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193-243. Doi: 10.1080/02724990344000141
• Le Pelley M, Mitchell C, Beesley T, George D, & Wills AJ (2016). Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1111-1140. Doi: 10.1037/bul0000064
• Le Pelley ME, Vadillo M, & Luque D (2013). Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: Evidence from the dot probe task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 18881900. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033700
• León SP, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2008). Retrieval of simple cue-outcome relationships is context-specific within informative contexts. Escritos de Psicología, 2, 63-71.
• León SP, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2010a). Giving contexts informative value makes information context specific. Experimental Psychology, 57, 46-53. Doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000006
• León SP, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2010b). The effect of context change on simple acquisition disappears with increased training. Psicologica, 31, 49-63.
• León SP, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2011). Context-outcome associations mediate context-switch effects in a human predictive learning task. Learning and Motivation, 42, 84-98. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2010.10.001
• León SP, Callejas-Aguilera JE, & Rosas JM (2012). Context switch effects and context experience in rats’ conditioned taste aversion. Psicologica, 33, 15-38.
• León SP, Gámez MA, & Rosas JM (2012). Mechanisms of contextual control when contexts are informative to solve the task. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 10-19. Doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37279
• Lucke S, Lachnit H, Koenig S, & Uengoer, M. (2013). The informational value of contexts affects context-dependent learning. Learning & Behavior, 41, 285–97. Doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0104-z
• Lucke S, Lachnit H, Stüttgen MC, & Uengoer M (2014). The impact of context relevance during extinction learning. Learning & Behavior, 42, 256–269. Doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0143-0
• Luque D, Vadillo MA, Le Pelley ME, & Beesley T (2016). Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: Examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 1-52. Doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1188407
• Mackintosh NJ (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298. Doi: 10.1037/h0076778
• Mackintosh NJ (1975). Blocking of conditioned suppression: Role of the first compound trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 335-345. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.1.4.335
• Mensink GJ & Raaijmakers JG (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455. Doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.434
• Murphy R, Baker A, & Fouquet N (2001). Relative validity of contextual and discrete cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 137-152. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.27.2.137
• Myers CE & Gluck MA (1994). Context, conditioning and hippocampal re-representation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835-847. Doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.5.835
• Nakajima S, Tanaka S, Urushihara K, & Imada H (2000). Renewal of extinguished lever-press responses upon return to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 31, 416-431. Doi: 10.1006/lmot.2000.1064
• Nelson JB (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 33, 284-310. Doi: 10.1006/lmot.2001.1112
• Nelson JB & Callejas-Aguilera JE (2007). The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 314-326. Doi: 10.1037/00977403.33.3.314
• Nelson JB & Lamoureux JA (2015). Contextual control of conditioning is not affected by extinction in a behavioral task with humans. Learning & Behavior, 43, 163-178. Doi:10.3758/s13420-015-0170-5
• Nelson JB, Lamoreux JA, & León SP (2013). Extinction arouses attention to the context in a behavioral suppression method with humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 39, 99-105. Doi: 10.1037/a0030759
• Nelson JB, Lombas S, & Léon, SP (2011). Concurrent extinction does not render appetitive conditioning context specific. Learning & Behavior, 39, 87-94. Doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0023-9
• Nelson JB, Sanjuan MC, Vadillo-Ruiz S, Pérez J, & León SP (2011). Experimental Renewal in Human Participants, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 58-70. Doi: 10.1037/a0020519
• Neumann DL (2007). The resistance of renewal to instructions that devalue the role of contextual cues in a conditioned suppression task with humans. Learning and Motivation, 38, 105-127. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.002
• Ostlund SB & Balleine BW (2007) Selective reinstatement of instrumental performance depends on the discriminative stimulus properties of the mediating outcome. Learning & Behavior, 35, 43–52. Doi: 10.3758/bf03196073
• Paredes Olay C & Rosas JM (1999). Within-subjects extinction and renewal in predictive judgments. Psicologica, 20, 195-210.
• Pavlov IP (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press. Pearce JM (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73. Doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.94.1.61
• Pearce JM (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607. Doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.101.4.587
• Pearce JM (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 73-95. Doi: 10.3758/bf03192911
• Pearce JM & Hall G (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552. Doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.87.6.532
• Pearce JM & Mackintosh NJ (2010). Two theories of attention: A review and a possible integration. In CJ Mitchell & ME Le Pelley (Eds.), Attention and Associative Learning: from Brain to Behaviour (pp. 11-40), New York: Oxford University Press.
• Pearce JM, Redhead ES, & Aydin A (1997). Partial reinforcement in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning with rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 273-294.
• Posner MI, Nissen MJ, & Ogden WC (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In HL Pick & IJ Saltzman (Eds.) Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Preston GC, Dickinson A, & Mackintosh NJ (1986). Contextual conditional discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 38B, 217-237.
• Rescorla RA & Heth CD (1975). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 88-96. Doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.1.1.88
• Rescorla R & Wagner A (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In AH Black & WF Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Rosas JM, Callejas Aguilera JE, Ramos Álvarez MM, & Fernández Abad MJ (2006). Revision of Retrieval Theory of Forgetting: What does Make Information Context-Specific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 147-166.
• Rosas JM, García Gutiérrez A, & Callejas Aguilera, JE (2006). Effects of context change upon first and second-learned information in human predictive learning. Psicologica, 27, 35-56.
• Rosas JM, García Gutiérrez A, & Callejas Aguilera JE (2007). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Psicologica, 28, 129-150.
• Rosas JM, Todd TP, & Bouton ME (2013). Context change and associative learning. WIRE Cognitive Science, 4, 237-244. Doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225
• Rosas JM, Vila NJ, Lugo M, & López L (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 153-164. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.27.2.153
• Rosas JM & Callejas Aguilera JE (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 461-474. Doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.461
• Rosas JM & Callejas Aguilera JE (2007). Acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion becomes context dependent when it is learned alter extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 9-15. Doi: 10.1080/17470210600971519
• Schmajuk NA, Lam Y, & Gray JA (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.3.321
• Sjödén P & Archer T (1989). Taste-aversion conditioning: The role of contextual stimuli. In T Archer & LG Nilsson (Eds.), Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety perspectives on aversively motivated behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Sutherland NS & Mackintosh NJ (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.
• Swan JA & Pearce JM (1988). The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 292-301. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.292
• Tamai N & Nakajima S (2000). Renewal of formerly conditioned fear in rats after extensive extinction training. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 13, 137-147.
• Thomas BL, Larsen NL, & Ayres JJB (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation, 34, 410-436. Doi: 10.1016/s0023-9690(03)00037-7
• Vadillo MA, Orgaz C, Luque D, & Nelson JB (2016). Ambiguity produces attention shifts in category learning. Learning & Memory, 23, 134-140. Doi: 10.1101/lm.041145.115
• Wagner AR & Rescorla RA (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In RA Boakes & MS Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and Learning (pp. 301-336). New York: Academic Press.