Hacia la no-dominación en el ámbito laboralalgunas propuestas neorrepublicanas

  1. Ruiz Ruiz, Ramon 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos

ISSN: 1133-0937

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 46

Páginas: 85-113

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.20318/DYL.2022.6515 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos

Resumen

It is possible to argue that the ultimate aim of civic republicanism is to implement the ideal of freedom as non-domination. Threats to freedom thus understood do not only come from the public powers, but also from certain private spheres, including, to a large extent, the world of work, where employees are often subject to the arbitrary decisions of their employers. Thus, from this doctrine some proposals have been formulated aimed at eliminating –or, at least, mitigating– domination in this area, which will be reported in this paper.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • A. BRYAN, “The Dominating Effects of Economic Crises”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2019, p. 4).
  • A. FUSCO, “Liberalism and Republicanism: Public Policy Implications”, Freedom, the Market, and Citizenship: A Repubican Sketch of the Civic Economy, 2013, p. 16
  • A. GOUREVITCH, “Labor and Republican Liberty”, Constellations, núm. 18 vol. 3, 2011, p. 431.
  • A. GOUREVITCH, “The Limits of a Basic Income: Means and Ends of Workplace Democracy”, Basic Income Studies, núm. 11 vol. 1, 2016, p. 23.
  • A.L. BOGG, “Republican Non-Domination and Labour Law: New Normativity or Trojan Horse?”, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law, núm. 33 vol. 3, pp. 394-417.
  • B. MCDONNELL, “Employee Primacy, or Economics Meets Civic Republicanism at Work”, Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, núm. 13 vol. 2, 2008, p. 362.
  • B.H. MCDONNELL, “Employee Primacy, or Economics Meets Civic Republicanism at Work”, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper nº 06-06, University of Minnesota Law School, 2006, p. 4.
  • B.H. MCDONNELL, “Employee Primacy, or Economics Meets Civic Republicanism at Work”).
  • B.H. MCDONNELL, “Strategies for an Employee Role in Corporate Governance”, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper nº 12-07, University of Minnesota Law School, 2012, p. 104.
  • C. MCMAHON, “The Indeterminacy of Republican Policy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, núm. 33 vol. 1, p. 81.
  • C. SUNSTEIN, The Partial Constitution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1993, p. 136).
  • C. TAYLOR, “Por qué la democracia necesita el patriotismo”, en M. C. NUSSBAUM, Los límites del patriotismo. Identidad, pertenencia y ciudadanía mundial, Paidós, Barcelona,1999, p.
  • D. CABRELLI y R. ZAHN, “Theories of Domination and Labour Law: An Alternative Conception for Internvention?”, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, núm. 33 vol. 3, 2017, pp. 339-364.
  • D. CASASSAS MARQUÉS, J. MARTÍNEZ-CAVA AGUILAR, D. RAVENTÓS PAÑELLA, “Socialismo y renta básica. Razones republicanas de la propuesta”, Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político, vol. 15, 2020, p. 48
  • D. CASASSAS y J. DE WISPELAERE, “Republicanism and the Political Economy of Democracy”, European Journal of Social Theory, núm. 19 vol. 2, 2016, p. 288.
  • D. JACOB y C. NEUHÄUSER, “Workplace Democracy, Market Competition and Republican Self-Respect”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, núm. 21, 2018, p. 934.
  • D. RAVENTÓS, “De qué hablamos cuando decimos que la renta básica es (o no) justa. Sobre liberalismos y republicanismos”, Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político, vol. 6, 2011, p. 234).
  • D. RAVENTÓS, Las condiciones materiales de la libertad, El Viejo Topo, Barcelona, 2007, pp. 87-88.
  • D. WATKINS, “Republicanism at Work: Strategies for Supporting Resistance to Domination in the Workplace”, Spectra. The Aspect Journal, vol. 4, núm.2, 2015.
  • E. ANDERSON, “Equality and Freedom in the Workplace: Recovering Republican Insights”, Social Philosophy and Policy, núm. 31 vol. 2, 2015, p. 68).
  • F. LOVETT, A General Theory of Domination and Justice, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 197-200.
  • G.F. GAUS, “Backwards into the Future: Neorepublicanism as a Postsocialist Critique of Market Society”, Social Philosophy and Policy, núm. 20 vol. 1, 2003, p. 67.
  • G.M. SHARRATT, “Free at work, free from work: Nondomination, unions, and basic income”, Journal of Labor and Society, núm.22, 2019, p. 614.
  • H. LANDEMORE e I. FERRERAS, “In Defense of Workplace Democracy: Towards a Justification of the Firm-State Analogy”, Political Theory, núm. 44, 2016.
  • I. GONZÁLEZ RICOY, “Democratizar la empresa: Un análisis desde la filosofía política”, Revista de Estudios Políticos, núm. 148, 2010, p. 52.
  • I. GONZÁLEZ RICOY, “Firms, States, and Democracy: A Qualified Defense of the Parallel Case Argument”, Law, Ethics and Philosophy, núm. 2, 2014, p. 33.
  • I. GONZÁLEZ RICOY, “Ownership and control rights in democratic firms. A republican approach”, Review of Social Economy, núm. 78 vol. 3, 2019, p. 7.
  • I. GONZÁLEZ RICOY, “The Republican Case for Workplace Democracy”, Social Theory and Practice, 2014, vol. 40, núm. 2, p. 245.
  • I. HONOHAN, Civic Republicanism, Civic republicanism, Routledge Nueva York, 2002, p. 172.
  • J.L. REY PÉREZ, “Renta básica universal”, Eunomia. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, núm. 19, 2020, p. 234).
  • K. BREEN, “Freedom, Republicanism, and Workplace Democracy”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, núm. 18 vol. 4, pp. 470-485.
  • K. WEEKS, The Problem with Work. Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries, Duke University Press, Londres, 2011, p. 16.
  • K.P. SCHAFF, “Democratic Rights in the Workplace”, Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, núm. 55 vol. 4, 2012, p. 389.
  • M.J. BERTOMEU y D. RAVENTÓS, “Renta básica y renta máxima: Una concepción republicano-democrática, Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, núm. 18, 2020, p. 204).
  • Mª. J. AÑÓN, “Ciudadanía social: La lucha por los derechos sociales”, Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, núm. 6, 2002.
  • N. HSIEH, “Justice in Production”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, núm. 16 vol. 1, 2008, p. 82.
  • N. HSIEH, “Rawlsian Justice and Workplace Republicanism”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 31, núm. 1, 2005, p. 125).
  • O. LAZAR, “Work, Domination, and the False Hope of Universal Basic Income”, Res Publica, published online 22 October 2020.
  • O. LAZAR, “Work, Domination, and the False Hope of Universal Basic Income”, Res Publica, published online 22 October 2020
  • P. BREST, “Further Beyond the Republican Revival: Toward Radical Republicanism”, Yale Law Journal, vol. 97, 1988, p. 1627.
  • P. PETTIT, “The Globalized Republican Ideal”, Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, núm. 9 vol. 1, 2016, p. 52).
  • P. VAN PARIJS y Y. VANDERBOGHT, La renta básica: Una medida eficaz para luchar contra la pobreza, Paidós, Barcelona, 2006, pp. 70-71).
  • Ph. PETTIT, “A Republican Right to Basic Income?”, Basic Income Studies, núm. 2 vol. 2, 2007, pp. 2-9.
  • Ph. PETTIT, Republicanismo. Una teoría sobre la libertad y el gobierno, Paidós, Barcelona, 1999, p. 212.
  • R. DAGGER, “Neo republicanism and the civic economy”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, núm. 5 vol. 2, 2006, p. 154-166.
  • R. DAHL, A Preface to Economic Democracy, University of California Press, Berkely, 1985, p. 111.
  • R. FREGA, L. HERZOG Y C. NEUHÄUSER, “Workplace Democracy: The Recent Debate”, Philosophy Compass, núm. 14 vol. 3, 2019, p. 5.
  • R. RUIZ RUIZ, “Democracia, virtud cívica y derechos sociales”, Derechos y libertades, núm. 35, 2016.
  • R. TAYLOR, Exit Left. Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought, Oxford University Press, pp. 55-56).
  • S. WHITE, “The Republican Critique of Capitalism”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, núm. 14 vol. 5, 2011, p. 575.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet