The Use of the Progressive in Light of the AH in Monolingual EFL-Instructed Spanish Learners at University LevelA Longitudinal Learner Corpus-Based SLA Study

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aarts, B., Close, J., & Wallis, S. (2010). Recent changes in the use of the progressive construction in English. In B. Chapelle & N. Wada (Eds.), Distinctions in English Grammar, (pp. 148-167). Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
• Andersen, Roger W. (2002). The dimensions of ‘pastness’. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology, (pp. 79-105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.06and
• Andersen, Roger W., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012845
• Andersen, Roger W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 527-570). San Diego, Academic Press.
• Axelsson, M. W., & Hahn, A. (2001). The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English – a corpus-based study. ICAME Journal, 25, 5-30.
• Ayoun, D., & Salaberry, M. R. (2008). Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning, 58(3), 555-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00450.x
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The relationship of form and meaning: a cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13(3), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005634
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1995). A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0272263100014182
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471-508.
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). The role of discourse: The Interlanguage Discourse Hypothesis. Language Learning, 50(1), 277-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.50.s1.7
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2004a). The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In M. Overstreet, S. Rott, B, Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Form and meaning in second language acquisition, (pp. 115-137). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2004b). Monopolizing the future: How the go-future breaks into will’s territory and what it tells us about SLA. EuroSLA Yearbook, 4, 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.4.09bar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2012). After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In E. Labeau & I. Saddour (Eds.), Tense, aspect and mood in First and Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 131-151). Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207188_008
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2017). Beyond individual form-meaning associations in L2 tense-mood-aspect research. In P. Leclercq, & M. Howard (Eds.), Tense, aspect, and modality in English and French, (pp. 27-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ sibil.50.02bar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 107-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587807
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bergström, A. (1996). Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: learner narratives in ESL and EFL. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 308-330. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.2.308
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Pearson Education.
• Blomberg, K. (2001). Swedish Learners’ Use of the Progressive Aspect in English, Uppsala, Uppsala University term paper.
• Collins, P. (2008). The progressive aspect in World Englishes: a corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600802308782
• Collins, P. (2009). The progressive in English. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond, (pp. 115-123). Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
• Comajoan, Ll. (2005). The emergence of L2 imperfective morphology in narrative retellings and conversations. Catalan Review, 19, 79-108. https://doi.org/10.3828/CATR.19.7
• Comajoan, Ll. (2006). The Aspect Hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56(2), 201-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00347.x
• Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Deshors, Sandra C. (2017). Zooming in on verbs in the progressive: a collostructional and correspondence analysis approach. Journal of English Linguistics, 45(3), 260-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424217717589
• Dose-Heidelmayer, S., & Götz, S. (2016). The progressive in spoken learner language: a corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(3), 229-256. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982
• Edwards, A. (2014). The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes, 33(2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12080
• Fuchs, R., & Werner, V. (2018a). Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.00004.int
• Fuchs, R., & Werner, V. (2018b). The use of the stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. Myth vs. (corpus) reality. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (4)2, 195-224. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr. 17010.fuc
• Fries, Charles C. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning, 67. s1, 130-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ lang.12226
• Giacalone Ramat, A. (1997). Progressive periphrases, markedness and second language data. In S. Eliasson & Ernst H. Jahr (Eds.), Language and its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen, (pp. 261-285). Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110805369.261
• Gut, U., & Fuchs, R. (2013). Progressive aspect in Nigerian English. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(3), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213492799
• Housen, A. (2000). Verb semantics and the acquisition of tense-aspect in L2 English. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00064
• Housen, A. (2002). A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb system. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, (pp. 77-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6.08hou
• Howard, M., & Leclercq, P. (2017). Tense, aspect and modality in Second Language Acquisition: An overview. In M. Howard & P. Leclercq (Eds.), Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language. Contemporary perspectives, (pp. 1-25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.01how
• Huang, Ch. (1999). Tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of English and native English speakers: Inherent lexical aspect and unitary vs. repeated situation types. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 10, 113-129.
• Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hundt, M. (1998). New Zealand English Grammar: Fact or Fiction?. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Hundt, M., & Vogel, K. (2011). Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes: Fact of fiction? In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap, (pp. 145-165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.08vog
• Hundt, M., Rautionaho, P., & Strobl, C. (2020). Progressive or simple? A corpus-based study of aspect in World Englishes. Corpora, 15(1), 77-106. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2020.0186
• Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen & M. B. J. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, (pp. 277-322). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts.
• Kranich, S. (2010). The progressive in Modern English: a Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
• Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, Ch., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2007). Past progressive or simple past? The acquisition of progressive aspect by Polish advanced learners of English. In E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda, & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom: Selected Papers from the 6th International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (TaLC 6), University of Granada, Spain, 4–7 July, 2004, (pp. 253-267). Amsterdam: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/ 9789401203906_017
• Levin, M. (2013). The progressive verb in modern American English. In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech & S. Wallis (Eds.), The verb phrase in English. Investigating recent language change with corpora, (pp.187-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.009
• Mair, Ch., & Hundt, M. (1995). Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English: A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2, 111-122.
• Martínez Vázquez, M. (2018a). A corpus-based study of I am thinking in political speeches. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 24(2), 107-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.20420/ rlfe.2018.368
• Martínez Vázquez, M. (2018b). I’m loving it! A corpus-based study of the progress of love. Journal of English Linguistics, 46(2), 140-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0075424218765609
• Meriläinen, L. (2018). The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. Tracing the effects of an exposure-rich learning environment. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4(2), 164-194. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17002.mer
• Meriläinen, L., Paulasto, H., & Rautionaho, P. (2017). Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola, A. Mauranen & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Changing English. Global and Local Perspectives (pp. 191-216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110429657-011
• Muñoz, C. & Gilabert, R. (2011). More evidence concerning the Aspect Hypothesis: the acquisition of the progressive aspect by Catalan-Spanish instructed learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1515/ iral.2011.014
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
• Ranta, E. (2006). The ‘attractive’ progressive: Why use the –ing form in English as a Lingua Franca? Nordic Journal of English Studies, 5(2), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.13
• Rautionaho, P. (2014). Variation in the Progressive. A Corpus-Based Study into World Englishes. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
• Rautionaho, P., & Deshors, S. (2018). Progressive or not progressive? Modeling the constructional choices of EFL and ESL writers. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4(2), 225-252. https://doi.org/10.1075/ ijlcr.16019.rau
• Robison, R. (1990). The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 315-330.
• Robison, R. (1995). The aspect hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 16, 344-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.344
• Rogatcheva, Svetlomira I. (2012). Measuring learner misuse: Tense and aspect errors in the Bulgarian and German components of ICLE. In J. Thomas & A. Boulton (Eds.), Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora (pp. 258-272). Brno: Masaryk University Press.
• Römer, U. (2005). Progressive, Patterns, and Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts, and Didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Salaberry, M. R. (2000). The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting. System, 28(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00065-2
• Shirai, Y. (1995). Tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of Japanese. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference in Language Development (Vol 2), (pp. 575-586). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
• Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language, 71(4), 743-762. https://doi.org/10.2307/415743
• Van Rooy, B. (2006). The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes, 25(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00446.x
• Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143-160. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2182371
• Vraicu, A. (2013). Exploring the upper limits of the Aspect Hypothesis: Tense-aspect morphology in the advanced English L2 variety. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(2), 256-290. https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.06vra
• Wulff, S., & Römer, U. (2009). Becoming a proficient academic writer: shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora, 4(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503209000276
• Yllera, A. (1999). Las perífrasis verbales de gerundio y participio. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentals. Relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales, (pp. 3391-3442). Madrid: Espasa.