Las ratas y de la gente: Una Selección de Análisis Comparativo de Cue de la competencia, los contenidos de aprendizaje, y Recuperación

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alvarado A, Jara E, Vila J, & Rosas JM (2006). Time and order effects on causal learning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 324-345. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.11.001
• Arcediano F, Escobar H, & Matute H (2001). Reversal from blocking in humans as a result of postraining extinction of the blocking stimulus. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 354-366. Doi: 10.3758/BF03192901
• Arcediano F, Matute H, & Miller RR (1997). Blocking of Pavlovian conditioning in humans. Learning and Motivation, 28, 188-199. Doi: 10.1006/lmot.1996.0957
• Baetu I & Baker AG (2010). Extinction and blocking of conditioned inhibition in human causal learning. Learning & Behavior, 38, 394-407. Doi: 10.3758/LB.38.4.394
• Bahrick HP, Clark S, & Bahrick P (1967). Generalization gradients as indicants of learning and retention of a recognition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 464-471. Doi: 10.1037/h0025131
• Baker AG, Mercier P, Vallee-Tourangeau F, Frank R, & Pan M (1993). Selective associations and causality judgments: presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 413-432. Doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.414
• Blaisdell AP, Gunther LM, & Miller RR (1999). Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 63-76. Doi: 10.3758/BF03199432
• Boakes R (1984). From Darwin to Behaviorism: Psychology and the minds of animals. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
• Bonardi C, Honey RC, & Hall, G (1990). Context specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229-237. Doi: 10.3758/BF03205280
• Bouton ME (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80
• Bouton ME & Bolles RC (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10, 445-466. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2
• Bouton ME & King DA (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248-265. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.248
• Bouton ME, Nelson JB, & Rosas, JM (1999). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
• Bouton, M. E., & Ricker, S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317-324. Doi: 10.3758/BF03209840
• Bouton ME & Swartzentruber D (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333-350. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.12.4.333
• Bouton ME & Peck C (1992) Spontaneous recovery in cross-motivational transfer (counterconditioning). Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 313-321. Doi: 10.3758/BF03197954
• Bouton ME & Todd TP (2014). A fundamental role for context in instrumental learning and extinction. Behavioural Processes, 104, 13-19. Doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.012
• Brooks DC, Hale B, Nelson JB, & Bouton ME (1995). Reinstatement after counterconditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 383-390. Doi: 10.3758/BF03198938
• Brown AS (1976). Spontaneous recovery in human learning. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 321-338. Doi: 10.1037/00332909.83.2.32
• Colagiuri B & Lovibond PF (2015). How food cues can enhance and inhibit motivation to obtain and consume food. Appetite, 84, 79-87. Doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.023
• Colwill RM (1993). An associative analysis of instrumental learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 111-116. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772598
• Colwill RM (1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. The Psychology of Learning and motivation, 31, 1-72. Doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60408-9
• Colwill RM & Rescorla RA (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132. Doi: 10.1037/00977403.11.1.120
• Colwill RM & Rescorla RA (1986). Associative structure in instrumental learning. The psychology of learning and motivation, 20, 55-104. Doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60016-X
• Colwill RM & Rescorla RA (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 155-164. Doi: 10.1037/00977403.14.2.155
• Colwill RM & Rescorla RA (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 71-82. Doi: 10.3758/BF03205241
• Corbit LH & Balleine BW (2011). The general and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer are differentially mediated by the nucleus accumbens core and shell. Journal of Neuroscience. 31, 11786-11794 Doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2711-11.2011
• Darwin C (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (Vol 1). London: John Murray.
• Davey GCL & Singh J (1988). The Kamin ‘‘blocking’’ effect and electrodermal conditioning in humans. Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 17–25.
• Delamater AR (1996). Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 437-449. Doi: 10.3758/BF03199015
• Delamater AR (1997). Selective reinstatement of stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 400-412. Doi: 10.3758/BF03209847
• Denniston JC, Miller RR, & Matute H (1996). Biological significance as a determinant of cue competition. Psychological Science, 7, 325-331. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00383.x
• Dickinson A & Burke J (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 6080. Doi: 10.1080/713932614
• Effting M & Kindt M (2007). Contextual control of human fear associations in a renewal paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2002-2018. Doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.011
• Enright MK, Rovee-Collier CK, Fagen JW, & Caniglia K (1983). The effects of distributed training on retention and operant conditioning in human infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 512-524. Doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(83)90030-9
• Franks CM (1963). Personality and eyeblink conditioning seven years later. Acta Psychologica, 21, 295-312. Doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(63)90055-6
• Gámez AM & Rosas JM (2005). Transfer of stimulus control across instrumental responses is attenuated by extinction in human instrumental conditioning. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 5, 207-222.
• Gámez AM, León SP, & Rosas JM (2016). Roles of context in acquisition of human instrumental learning: Implications for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying context-switch effects. Learning & Behavior. Doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0256-8
• Gámez AM, Martos R, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2013). Associative relationships in human predictive learning. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, e5, 1-11. Doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.7
• Gámez AM & Rosas JM (2007). Associations in human instrumental conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 38, 242-261. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.001
• García Gutiérrez A & Rosas JM (2003). Context change as the mechanism of reinstatement in causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 292-310. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.292
• García Gutiérrez A & Rosas JM (2003). The role of number of cues on retroactive interference in causal learning. Psicológica, 24, 215-241.
• García-Gutiérrez A, Rosas JM, & Nelson JB (2005). Extensive interference attenuates reinstatement in human predictive judgments. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18, 240-248.
• Gleitman H & Holmes PA (1967). Retention of incompletely learned CER in rats. Psychonomic Science, 7, 19-20. Doi: 10.3758/BF03331055
• Goddard MJ (1999). The effects of context extinction on US signal value. Learning and Motivation, 38, 314-325. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.004
• Hall G & Honey RC (1990). Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 271-278. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.16.3.271
• Hartman TF & Grant DA (1962). Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 131-136. Doi: 10.1037/h0045437
• Havermans RC, Keuker J, Lataster T, & Jansen A (2005). Contextual control of extinguished conditioned performance in humans. Learning and Motivation, 36, 1-19. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2004.09.002
• Hendersen RW (1978). Forgetting of conditioned fear inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 9, 16-30. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(78)90024-3
• Hendersen RW (1985). Fearful memories: the motivational significance of forgetting. In FR Brush & JB Overmier (Eds.), Affect, conditioning, and cognition: Essays on the determinants of behavior (pp. 43-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hinchy J, Lovibond PF, & Ter-Horst KM (1995). Blocking in human electrodermal conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 2-12. Doi: 10.1080/14640749508401433
• Hoffman HS, Selekman W, & Jensen P (1966). Stimulus aspects of aversive controls: Long-term effects of conditioned suppression procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 659-662. Doi: 10.1901/ jeab.1966.9-659
• Hogarth L, Reetzler C, Munafo MR, Tran DMD, Troisi II, JR, Rose, AK, Jones A, & Field M (2014). Extinction of cue-evoked drug-seeking relies on degrading hierarchical instrumental expectancies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 59, 61-70. Doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.06.001
• Holland PC (1984). Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 476-497. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.10.4.476
• Holland PC (1999). Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: No recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 307–333. Doi: 10.1080/027249999393022
• Hull C (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Humphreys LG, Miller J, & Ellson DG (1940). The effect of the inter-trial interval on the acquisition, extinction, and recovery of verbal expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 195-202. Doi: 10.1037/h0054580
• Kamin LJ & Schaub RE (1963). Effects of conditioned stimulus intensity of the conditioned emotional response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 502-507. Doi: 10.1037/h0046616
• Kamin LJ (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-298). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Kaufman MA & Bolles RC (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 318-320. Doi: 10.3758/BF03333639
• Kimball BA & Billings V (2007). Do herbivores associate flavours with specific consequences in flavour aversion learning? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 107, 252-261. Doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.006
• Konorski J (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Laurent V, Chieng B & Balleine BW (2016). Extinction Generates Outcome-Specific Conditioned Inhibition. Current Biology, 23, 3169-3175. Doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.021
• Le Pelley ME & McLaren IPL (2001). Retrospective revaluation in humans: Learning or memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 311-352. Doi: 10.1080/713932762
• León SP, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2010). The effect of context change on simple acquisition disappears with increased training. Psicologica, 31, 49-63.
• León SP, Abad MJF, & Rosas JM (2011). Context-outcome associations mediate context-switch effects in a human predictive learning task. Learning and Motivation, 42, 84-98. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2010.10.001
• León SP, Callejas Aguilera JE, & Rosas JM (2012). Context switch effects and context experience in rats’ conditioned taste aversion. Psicologica, 33, 15-38.
• Little, AH, Lipsitt LP, & Rovee-Collier CK (1984). Classical conditioning and retention of the infant’s eyelid response: Effects of age and interstimulus interval. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 512-524. Doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90074-2
• Lovibond PF & Colagiuri B (2013). Facilitation of voluntary goal-directed action by reward cues. Psychological Science, 24, 2030-2037. Doi: 10.1177/0956797613484043
• Lovibond PF, Satkunarajah M, & Colagiuri B (2015). Extinction can reduce the impact of reward cues on rewardseeking behavior. Behavioural Therapy, 46, 432-438. Doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.03.005
• Lovibond PF, Siddle, DAT, & Bond N. (1988). Insensitivity to stimulus validity in human Pavlovian conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 377-410. Doi: 10.1080/14640748808402331
• Mackintosh NJ (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186-192. Doi: 10.3758/BF03214033
• Maes E, Boddez Y, Alfei JM, Krypotos, D’Hooge R, De Houwer J, & Beckers T (2016). The elusive nature of the blocking effect: 15 failures to replicate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 49-71. Doi: 10.1037/xge0000200
• Matsumoto Y & Mizunami M (2002). Temporal determinants of long-term retention of olfactory memory in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 1429-1437.
• Matute H, Arcediano F, & Miller RR (1996). Test question modulates cue competition between causes and between effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 182-196. Doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.182
• Matute H, Vegas S, & De Marez PJ (2002). Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 714-725. Doi: 10.1037/02787393.22.1.182
• Matzel LD, Schachtman TR, & Miller RR (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 16, 398-412. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(85)90023-2
• Miller RR, Barnet RC, & Grahame NJ (1992). Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 251-264. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.18.3.251
• Miller RR, Hallam SC, & Grahame NJ (1990). Inflation of comparator stimuli following CS training. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 434-443. Doi: 10.3758/BF03205325
• Miller RR & Matute H (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370-386. Doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.370
• Miller RR & Witnauer JE (2016). Retrospective evaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications. Behavioural Processes, 123, 15-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.001
• Mineka S, Mystkowski JL, Hladek D, & Rodriguez BI (1999). The effects of changing contexts on return of fear following exposure treatment for spider fear. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 599-604. Doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.4.599
• Mitchell CJ & Lovibond PF (2002). Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 311-329. Doi: 10.1080/02724990244000025
• Morris RW, Quail S, Griffiths KR, Green MJ, & Balleine B (2016). Corticostriatal control of goal-directed action is impaired in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 77, 187-195. Doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.06.005
• Nakajima S, Tanaka S, Urushihara K, & Imada H (2000). Renewal of extinguished lever-press responses upon return to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 31, 416-431. Doi: 10.1006/lmot.2000.1064
• Nelson JB, Lombas S, & Léon, SP (2011). Concurrent extinction does not render appetitive conditioning context specific. Learning & Behavior, 39, 87–94. Doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0023-9
• Nelson JB, Sanjuán MC, Vadillo Ruiz S, Pérez J, & León SP (2011). Experimental renewal in human participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 58-70. Doi: 10.1037/a0020519
• Neumann DL (2006). The effects of physical context changes and multiple extinction contexts on two forms of renewal in a conditioned suppression task with humans. Learning and Motivation, 37, 149-175. Doi:
• 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.06.004 Neumann DL (2007). The resistance of renewal to instructions that devalue the role of contextual cues in a conditioned suppression task with humans. Learning and Motivation, 38, 105-127. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.002
• Neumann DL, Lipp OV, & Cory SE (2007). Conducting extinction in multiple contexts does not necessarily attenuate the renewal of shock expectancy in a fear conditioning procedure with humans. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 385-394. Doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.02.001
• Okifuji A & Friedman AG (1992). Experimentally induced taste aversions in humans: Effects of overshadowing on acquisition. Behavioural Research Therapy, 30, 23-32. Doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90092-U
• Overmier JB & Lawry JA (1979). Pavlovian conditioning and the mediation of behavior. In GH Bower (ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol 13 (pp. 1-55). New York: Academic Press.
• Paredes Olay C, Abad MJF, Gámez M, & Rosas JM (2002). Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 239-248. Doi: 10.3758/BF03192833
• Paredes Olay C & Rosas JM (1999). Within-subjects extinction and renewal in predictive judgments. Psicologica, 20, 195-210.
• Pavlov IP (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. London: Oxford University Press. Doi: 10.5214/ans.0972-7531.1017309 Peck CA & Bouton ME (1990). Context and performance in aversive-to-appetitive and appetitive-to-aversive transfer.
• Learning and Motivation, 21, 1-31. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(90)90002-6
• Rauhut AS, McPhee J, DiPietro N., & Ayres JJB (2000) Conditioned inhibition training of the competing cue after compound conditioning does not reduce cue competition. Animal Learning & Behavior. 28, 92-108. Doi: 10.3758/BF03199775
• Rescorla RA (1997). Response-inhibition in extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 238252. Doi: 10.1080/713932655
• Rescorla RA (1973). Effect of US habituation following conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 82, 137-143. Doi: 10.1037/h0033815
• Rescorla RA (1991). Associative relations in instrumental learning: The Eighteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 1-23. Doi: 10.1080/14640749108401256
• Rescorla RA (1992a). Associations between an instrumental discriminative stimulus and multiple outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 95-104. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.18.1.95
• Rescorla RA (1992b). Response-outcome versus outcome-response associations in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 223-232. Doi: 10.3758/BF03213376
• Rescorla RA (1993). Preservation of response-outcome associations through extinction. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 238-245. Doi: 10.3758/BF03197988
• Rescorla RA & Freberg L (1978). The extinction of within-compound flavor associations. Learning and Motivation, 9, 411-427. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(78)90003-6
• Rescorla RA & Heth CD (1975). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 88-96. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.1.1.88
• Rescorla RA & Solomon RL (1967). Two-process learning theory: relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151-182. Doi: 10.1037/h0024475
• Rescorla R & Wagner A (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Revusky SH (1968). Aversion to sucrose produced by contingent X irradiation: Temporal and dosage parameters. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 65, 17-22. Doi: 10.1037/h0025416
• Riccio DC, Richardson R, & Ebner DL (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.152
• Robbins SJ (1990). Mechanisms underlying spontaneous recovery in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 235-249. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.16.3.235
• Romero MA, Vila NJ, & Rosas JM (2003). Time and context effects after discrimination reversal in human beings. Psicologica, 24, 169-184.
• Rosas JM & Bouton ME (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 341348. Doi: 10.3758/BF03198982
• Rosas JM & Callejas Aguilera JE (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 461-474. Doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.461
• Rosas JM, García Gutiérrez A, & Callejas Aguilera JE (2006). Effects of context change upon first and second-learned information in human predictive learning. Psicologica, 27, 35-56.
• Rosas JM, García Gutiérrez A, & Callejas Aguilera, JE (2007). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Psicologica, 28, 129-150.
• Rosas JM, Paredes Olay MC, García Gutiérrez A, Espinosa JJ, & Abad MJF (2010). Outcome-specific transfer between predictive and instrumental learning is unaffected by extinction but reversed by counterconditioning in human participants. Learning and Motivation, 4, 48-66. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2009.09.002
• Rosas JM, Todd TP, & Bouton ME (2013). Context change and associative learning. WIRE Cognitive Science, 4, 237-244. Doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225
• Rosas JM, Vila NJ, Lugo M, & López L (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 153-164. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.27.2.153
• Sahley CL, Martin KA, & Gelperin A (1990). An analysis of associative learning in a terrestrial mollusc. II. Appetitive learning. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 167, 339-345. Doi: 10.1007/BF00612791
• Sandoz JC & Pham-Delègue MH (2004). Spontaneous Recovery After Extinction of the Conditioned Proboscis Extension Response in the Honeybee. Learning & Memory, 11, 586-597. Doi: 10.1101/lm.81504
• Schachtman T, Threlkeld R, & Meyer K (2000). Retention of conditioned inhibition produced by extinction. Learning and Motivation, 31, 283-300. Doi: 10.1006/lmot.2000.1061
• Schiller D, Monfils MH, Raio CM, Johnson DC, LeDoux JE, Phelps EA (2010). Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms. Nature, 463, U49-U51. Doi: 10.1038/nature08637
• Schiller D, Cain CK, Curley NG, Schwarz JS, Stern SA, LeDoux JE, & Phelps EA (2008). Evidence for Recovery of Fear Following Immediate Extinction in Rats and Humans. Learning & Memory, 15, 394-402. Doi: 10.1101/lm.909208
• Schugens MM & Daum I (1999). Long-term retention of classical eyeblink conditioning in amnesia. Neuroreport, 10, 149-152. Doi: 10.1097/00001756-199901180-00028
• Schweitzer L & Green L (1982). Reevaluation of things past: A test of the “retrospective hypothesis” using a CER procedure in rats. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 17, 62-68. Doi: 10.1007/BF03002000
• Shanks DR (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 378, 1-21. Doi: 10.1080/14640748508402082
• Shanks DR & Dickinson A (1988). Associative accounts of causality judgement. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 229-261. Doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60030-4
• Siegel S & Allan L (1985). Overshadowing and blocking of the orientation-contingent aftereffect: Evidence for a conditioning mechanism. Learning and Motivation, 16, 125138. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(85)90008-6
• Sissons HT & Miller RR (2009). Spontaneous recovery of excitation and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 419-426. Doi: 10.1037/a0014815
• Skinner BF (1938). The Behavior of Organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
• Spetch ML (1995). Overshadowing in landmark learning: Touchscreen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 166-181. Doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.21.2.166
• Stasiewicz PR, Brandon TH, & Bradizza CM (2007). Effects of extinction context and retrieval cues on renewal of alcohol cue reactivity among alcohol dependent outpatients. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 244248. Doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.2.244
• Sullivan MW, Rovee-Collier C, & Tynes DM (1979). A conditioning analysis of infant long-term memory. Child Development, 50, 152-162. Doi: 10.2307/1129051
• Tamai N & Nakajima S (2000): Renewal of formerly conditioned fear in rats after extensive extinction training. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 13, 137-147.
• Thewissen R, Snijders S, Havermans RC, Van den Hout M, & Jansen A (2006). Renewal of cue-elicited urge to smoke: Implications for cue exposure treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1441-1449. Doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.010
• Thomas DA (1979). Retention of conditioned inhibition in a bar-press suppression paradigm. Learning and Motivation, 10,161-177. Doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(79)90042-0
• Thomas BL, Larsen NL, & Ayres JJB (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation, 34, 410-436. Doi: 10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00037-7
• Thomas DA & Riccio DC (1979). Forgetting of a CS attribute in a conditioned suppression paradigm. Animal Learning & Behavior, 7, 191-195. Doi: 10.3758/BF03209270
• Thorndike EL (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement 2 (4, Whole No. 8). Doi: 10.1037/h0092987
• Thorndike EL (1932). The fundamentals of learning. New-York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Thrailkil EA & Bouton ME (2015). Contextual control of instrumental actions and habits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41, 69-80. Doi: 10.1037/xan0000045
• Tolman EC (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Tolman EC (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208. Doi: 10.1037/h0061626
• Trapold MA & Overmier JB (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In AA Black & FF Prokasy (Eds). Classical Conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 427-452). New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.
• Underwood BJ (1948). “Spontaneous Recovery” of verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 429-439. Doi: 10.1037/h0059565
• Van Hamme LJ & Wasserman EA (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127151. Doi: 10.1006/lmot.1994.1008
• Vega Z, Vila JN, & Rosas JM (2004). Efecto de devaluación e inflación de la consecuencia sobre la asociación respuesta-consecuencia en una tarea instrumental con humanos. Psicologica, 25, 163-179.
• Vila NJ, Romero MA, & Rosas JM (2002). Retroactive interference after discrimination reversal decreases following temporal and physical contexts in human subjects. Behavioural Processes, 59, 47-54. Doi: 10.1016/S03766357(02)00063-3
• Vila NJ & Rosas JM (2001). Reinstatement of acquisition performance by presentation of the outcome after extinction in causality judgments. Behavioural Processes, 56, 147-154. Doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00197-8
• Wagner AR (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In NE Spear & RR Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Wagner AR & Brandon SE (1989). Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (SOP). In SB Klein and RR Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theories (pp. 149-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Wagner AR, Logan FA, Haberlandt K, & Price T (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180. Doi: 10.1037/h0025414
• Waller RJ & Mays NM (2007). Spontaneous Recovery of Previously Extinguished Behavior as an Alternative Explanation for Extinction-Related Side Effects. Behavior Modification, 31, 569-572. Doi: 10.1177/0145445507300935
• Wasserman EL & Berglan R (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgments: The role of within-compound associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 121-138. Doi: 10.1080/713932675