Invirtiendo el aula en asignaturas de gestión de empresas utilizando diferentes herramientas metodológicas

  1. Jimenez, Rocio Martinez 1
  2. Ruiz Jiménez, Carmen 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

ISSN: 1988-9046

Ano de publicación: 2019

Número: 2

Páxinas: 49-67

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.17561//REE.V2019N2.3 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

Resumo

In recent years, we have experienced an important change in higher education context, which has led to the need for new teaching methodologies in which students acquire a much more active and responsible role. In this context, we find a new teaching-learning model such as the flipped classroom (Bergmann and Sams, 2012). This methodology assumes that class time in the classroom is devoted to applying, experimenting, researching, etc.; that is, working at the highest levels of Bloom's taxonomy. To do this, the teacher must develop different practices or activities that serve the student to reinforce what was previously learned at home and that, following Santiago and Bergmann (2018) can be included within, among others, the following categories: peer-to-peer teaching, project-based learning, case studies, simulations, role-playing, cooperative learning and gamification. In this paper, we present the students' assessment of the different techniques used when inverting the classroom in two subjects related to business management. More specifically, we analyze the degree of interest and fun they have aroused in them, as well as the extent to which each of these techniques has made them participate more actively, has improved the relationship with peers and with the teacher and has contributed to a greater understanding of the subject. The results show that the three methodologies best valued by the students are: gamification, role-playing and project-based learning. In this paper, we present the students' assessment of the different techniques used when inverting the classroom in two subjects related to business management. More specifically, we analyze the degree of interest and fun they have aroused in them, as well as the extent to which each of these techniques has made them participate more actively, has improved the relationship with peers and with the teacher and has contributed to a greater understanding of the subject. The results show that the three methodologies best valued by the students are: gamification, role-playing and project-based learning.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguayo Vergara, M.; Bravo Molina, M.; Nocetti de la Barra, A.; Concha Sarabia, L. y Aburto Godoy, R. (2019): “Perspectiva estudiantil del modelo pedagógico flipped clasroom o aula invertida en el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera”, Revista Educación, vol. 43, nº 1. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v43i1.31529.
  • Aguilera, C., Manzano, A., Martínez, I., Lozano, M.C y Casiano, C. (2017): “El modelo flipped Classroom”, International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology(INFAD)Revista de Psicología, nº 1-Monográfico 3, pp. 261-266.
  • Barkley, E.; Cross, K.P. y Major, C. (2007): Técnicas de aprendizaje colaborativo. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Morata, Madrid.
  • Bergmann, J. y Sams, A. (2012): Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Bishop, J.L. y Verleger, M.A. (2013): “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research”. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference y Exposition. Atlanta: American Society for Engineering Education.
  • Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. y Chen, N.S. (2014): “Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?”, Computers y Education, 79, pp. 16-27.
  • Davies, R.S.; Dean, D.L. y Ball, N. (2013): “Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course”, Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), pp.563-580.
  • DeNeve, K. y Heppner, M. (1997). “Role play simulations: The assessment of an active learning technique and comparisons with traditional lectures”, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 21, nº 3, pp. 231-246.
  • Enfield, J. (2013): “Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN”, TechTrends, vol. 57, nº 6, pp. 14-27.
  • Fernández March, A. (2006): “Metodologías activas para la formación de competencias”, Educatio siglo XXI, nº 24, pp. 35-56.
  • Fernández, A., Maiques, J.M., Ábalos, A. (2012): “Buenas prácticas docentes de los profesores universitarios: estudio de casos”, Revista de Docencia Universitaria (REDU), vol. 10, nº 1, pp.43-66.
  • Flores, O.; Del-Arco, I. y Silva, P. (2016): “The flipped classroom model at the university: analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, pp.13-21.
  • Fortanet, C., González, G., Mira, R., y López, J. (2013): “Aprendizaje cooperativo y flipped classroom. Ensayos y resultados de la metodología docente”. En M. Teresa, D. Álvarez y N. Pellín (Presidencia), XI Jornadas de Redes de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria. Retos de futuro en la enseñanza superior: docencia e investigación para alcanzar la excelencia académica, Alicante.
  • Fulton, K.P. (2012): “10 reasons to flip”, Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 94, nº 2, pp. 20-24.
  • Graaff, E. de y Bouhuijs, P. A. J. (eds.) (1993): Implementation of Problem based Learning in Higher Education, Thesis publishers, Amsterdam.
  • Gilboy, M.B.; Heinerichs, S. y Pazzaglia, G. (2015): “Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom”, Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, vol. 47, nº 1, pp. 109-114.
  • Gómez López, Y. y Muñoz Donate, F. (2018): Flipped Classroom en formación universitaria: aplicando una metodología inductiva para mejorar la eficacia del aprendizaje. Programa de formación de profesorado de la UNIA en materia de innovación docente y digital (2018-2019)
  • González-Gómez, D.; Jeong, J.S.; Airado-Rodríguez, D. y Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016): “Performance and perception in the Flipped Learning Model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, nº 3, pp. 450-459.
  • Hommes, J., Keizer, P., Pettigrew, M. y Troy, J. (1999): Educational Innovation in Economics, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston.
  • Jones, N. F., Rassmussen, C. M. y Moffitt, M. C. (1997): Real-life problem solving: A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning, American Psychological Association, Washington.
  • Kapp, K.M. (2012): The gamification of Learning and Instruction: game based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. Pfeiffer-Wiley, New York.
  • Khan, S. (2012): The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Lago, C., Arce, E., Casaís, L., Fariña, F., Fernández, M., García, J. L. y Viaño, J. (2012): “Utilización de un sistema tecnológico de feedback interactivo en la docencia universitaria para mejorar el rendimiento académico del alumnado y la calidad docente del profesorado: El programa Turning Point”, Revista del CIDUI, 1. Disponible en http://www.cidui.org/revistacidui/ index.php/cidui/article/view/254
  • Lundin, M.; Rensfeldt, A.B.; Hillman, T.; Lantz-Andersson, A. y Peterson, L. (2018): “Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: a systematic review of flipped classroom research”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 15, nº 1, pp. 15-20.
  • Martínez, W.; Esquivel, I. y Castillo, J. (2014): “Aula invertida o modelo invertido de aprendizaje: Origen, sustento e implicaciones” en Esquivel, I. (Coord.). Los modelos tecno-educativos, revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI, México, pp. 143-160.
  • Mason, G.S.; Shuman, T.R. y Cook, K.E. (2013): “Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in a upper-division engineering course”, IEEE Transactions and Education, vol. 56, nº 4, pp. 430-435.
  • McCarthy, J. (2016): “Reflections on a flipped classroom in first year higher education”, Issues in Educational Research, vol. 26, nº 2, pp. 332-350.
  • McGrath, D. (2002): “Teaching on the Front Lines: Using the Internet and Problem-Based Learning To Enhance Classroom Teaching”, Holist Nurs Pract, vol. 16, nº 2, pp.5-13.
  • McLaughlin, J.E.; Griffin, L.M.; Esserman, D.A.; Davidson, C.A.; Glatt, D.M.; Roth, M.T. y Mumper, R.J. (2013): “Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 77, nº 9, article 196.
  • McLaughlin, J.E.; Roth, M.T.; Glatt, D.M.; Gharkolonaerehe, N.; Davidson, C.A.; Griffin, L.M.; Esserman, D.A. y Mumper, R.J. (2014): “The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school”, Academic Medicine, vol. 89, nº 2, pp. 236-243.
  • McNally, B.; Chipperfield, J.; Dorsett, P.; Del Fabbro, L.; Frommolt, V.; Goetz, S.; Lewohl, J.; Molineux, M.; Pearson, A.; Reddan, G.; Roiko,A. y Rung, A. (2017): “Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context”, Higher Education, vol. 73, nº 2, pp. 281-298.
  • Monedero, C.R., y Castro, A. (2018): “Un proyecto de aplicación de la clase invertida en la Ciencias de la Comunicación” en Redine (Ed.). Innovative Strategies For Higher Education in Spain, Adaya Press. pp. 69-79, Eindhoven, NL.
  • Moya Fuentes, M.M. y Soler García, C. (2018): “La gamificación mediante herramientas virtuales de respuesta de audiencia: la experiencia de Socrative y Kahoot!”, en Roig-Vila (ed). El compromiso académico y social a través de la investigación e innovación educativas en la Enseñanza Superior, Octaedro. pp. 1154-1163, Barcelona.
  • Murga-Menoyo, M.A, Bautista, M.J. y Novo, M. (2011): “Mapas conceptuales con Cmap Tools en la enseñanza universitaria de la educación ambiental. Estudio de caso en la UNED”, Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. 29, nº 1, pp.47-60.
  • Nouri, J. (2016): “The flipped classroom for active, effective and increased learning-especially for low achievers”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 13, nº 1, pp. 33.
  • Novak, J.D. y Cañas, A.J. (2006): La teoría subyacente a los mapas conceptuales y a cómo construirlos. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. http://www.ihmc.us/
  • Novak, J.D. y Gowin, D.B. (1988): Aprendiendo a Aprender. Ed. Martínez Roca: Barcelona.
  • O’Flaherty, J.; Phillips, C.; Karanicolas, S.; Snelling, C. y Winning, T. (2015): “The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review”, The Internet and Higher Education, nº 25, pp. 85-95.
  • Pontes, A. (2012): “Representación y comunicación del conocimiento con mapas conceptuales en la formación del profesorado de ciencia y tecnología”, Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, vol. 9, nº 1, pp. 106-123.
  • Prieto, A., Prieto, B., y Del Pino, B. (2016): “Una experiencia de flipped classroom”. En M. Torres y J. Cañadas (Presidencia), XXII Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática. Almería (España).
  • Roach, T. (2014): “Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics”, International Review of Economics Education, nº 17, pp. 74-84.
  • Rodríguez, K. P., Maya, M. A. y Jaén, J. S. (2012): “Educación en ingenierías: De las clases magistrales a la pedagogía del aprendizaje activo”, Revista Ingeniería y Desarrollo, vol. 30, nº 1, pp. 125-142. Disponible en http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85223369008
  • Roehl, A.; Reddy, S.L. y Shannon, G.J. (2013): “The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies”, Journal of Family y Consumer Sciences, vol. 105, nº 2, pp. 44-49.
  • Sáez, B., Viñegla, S., y Piedad, M. (2014): “Una experiencia de flipped classroom”. En C. González, R. López, y J. M. Aroca (Ed), Educar para transformar. Actas XI Jornadas Internacionales de Innovación Universitaria, pp. 345-352, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid.
  • Santiago, R. y Bergmann, J. (2018): Aprender al revés. Flipped learning 3.0 y metodologías activas en el aula, Paidós Educación, Barcelona
  • Sidhu, D.; Kwan, R.; Pexman, P. y Siakaluk, P. (2014): “Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs”, Acta psychologica, nº 149, pp. 32-39.
  • Strayer, J.F. (2012): “How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation”, Learning Environments Research, vol. 15, nº 2, pp. 171-193.
  • The Flipped Classroom (2019). ¿Qué es flipped classroom? [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://www.theflippedclassroom.es/what-is-innovacion-educativa/2019/02
  • Thomas, J. W. (2000): A review of research on project-based learning. California: Autodesk Foundation. Actualidadpedagogica.com “qué dicen los estudios sobre el aprendizaje basado en proyectos” José Sánchez. Disponible en: http://www.estuaria.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/estudios_aprendizaje_basado_en_proyectos1.pdf
  • Tourón, J. y Santiago, R. (2015): “El modelo Flipped Learning y el desarrollo del talento en la escuela”, Revista de Educación, nº 368, pp. 196-231.
  • Urbina, S., Arrabal, M., Conde, M., Ordinas, C., y Rodríguez, S. (2015): “Flipped classroom a través de videoconferencia. Un proyecto de innovación docente”, Campus Virtuales, vol. 4, nº 2, pp. 60-65.
  • Vidal, M.D., Ferrón, V. y De la Torre, J.M. (2011): “La metodología del aprendizaje por indagación en la enseñanza universitaria: ejemplos concretos de aplicación”, Congreso Internacional de Innovación Docente, Cartagena (Murcia).
Fonte de datos: Dialnet