Invarianza factorial del Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Físico Modificado (CAF-M) en universitarios mexicanos deportistas y no deportistas

  1. Barrón-Luján, J.C. 2
  2. Mayorga-Vega, D. 3
  3. Tristán-Rodríguez, JL. 1
  4. Guedea-Delgado, J.C. 2
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

    San Nicolás de los Garza, México

    ROR https://ror.org/01fh86n78

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua

    Chihuahua, México

    ROR https://ror.org/04mrrw205

  3. 3 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Mostra les afiliacions +
Revista:
Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1578-8423,  1989-5879

Any de publicació: 2017

Volum: 17

Número: 2

Pàgines: 45-52

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Altres publicacions en: Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

Resum

Te main purpose of the present study was to examine the factorial invariance of the Modifed Physical Self-Concept Questionnaire (CAF-M) in athlete and non-athlete Mexican university students. A sample of 1,528 Mexican university students, 651 athletes and 877 non-athletes, with an average age of 20.78 years (SD = 2.45) was used. Te confrmatory factor analyses showed that a two-factor structure is feasible and suitable for both populations. Based on statistical and substantive criteria, the two- factor structure (motor competency and physical attractiveness) has shown adequate adjustment indicators of reliability and validity. Additionally, the factor structure, factor loadings and intercepts are considered invariant in both studied populations. Diferences between athlete and non-athlete university students in the means values of the two factors were found. Finally, the present study also confrms the validity of the two-dimensional model of the physical self-concept. Future research studies should replicate these fndings in populations with diferent cultural and personal factors.

€ Mostra el finançament

Informació de finançament

Daniel Mayorga-Vega recibe una ayuda del Plan Propio del Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Transferencia de la Universidad de Granada.

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Abalo, J., Lévy, J., Rial, A., y Varela, J. (2006). Invarianza factorial con muestras múltiples. En J. Lévy (Ed.), Modelización con Estructuras de Covarianzas en Ciencias Sociales (pp. 259-278). Madrid: Netbiblo.
  • Arbuckle, J. R. (2012). AMOS users guide version 21.0. Chicago, IL: Marketing Department, SPSS Incorporated.
  • Baumgartner, T. A., Jackson, A. S., Mahar, M. T., y Rowe, D. A. (2015). Measurement for evaluation in kinesiology. 9th ed. United States: Jones & Bartlett.
  • Blanco, J. R., Blanco, H., Viciana, J., y Zueck, M. C. (2015). Psychometric properties of the physical self-concept questionnaire with mexican university students. Psychological Reports, 116(2), 422-437. doi: 10.2466/03.07.PR0.116k18w2
  • Blanco, H., Ornelas, M., Tristán, J. L., Cocca, A., Mayorga-Vega, D., López-Walle, J., y Viciana, J. (2013). Editor for creating and applying computerise surveys. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 935- 940. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.105
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cheung, G. W., y Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-ft indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi: 10.1207/s15328007SEM0902_5
  • Fox, K. R., y Corbin, C. B. (1989). Te Physical Self-Perception Profle: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sports & Exercise Psychology, 11(4), 408-430.
  • Gelabert, E., García-Esteve, L., Martín-Santos, R., Gutiérrez, F., Torres, A., y Subirà, S. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale in women. Psicothema, 23(1), 133-139.
  • González, O. (2005). Estructura multidimensional del autoconcepto físico. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 10(1), 121-130.
  • Goñi, A., Ruiz de Azúa, S., y Rodríguez, A. (2006). Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Físico Manual. Madrid: EOS.
  • Klesges, G., Haddock, C. K., Stein, R. J., Klesges, L. M., Eck, L. H., y Hanson, C. L. (1992). Relationship between psychosocial functioning and body fat in preschool children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 793-796.
  • Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., y Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relation to existing instruments. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16(3), 270-305.
  • Navas, L., Soriano, J. A., y Holgado, F. P. (2013). Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Físico (CAF) en una muestra de estudiantes chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(31), 809-830.
  • Reigal, R., Videra, A., Parra, J., y Juárez, R. (2012). Actividad físico deportiva, autoconcepto físico y bienestar psicológico en la adolescencia. Retos, 22(1), 19-23.
  • Revelle, W., y Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefcients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., y Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441.
  • Tompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confrmatory Factor Analysis. Understanding concepts and ap
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet