The magic mirror of Robert Rescorla’s methodological behaviorism

  1. Rosas, Juan M. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
Revista de historia de la psicología

ISSN: 0211-0040,  2445-0928

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 42

Número: 1

Páginas: 28-35

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de historia de la psicología

Resumen

La investigación en aprendizaje asume que los procesos de aprendizaje que subyacen a la conducta se reflejan en esta. Sin embargo, el aprendizaje puede que no se muestre como un cambio conductual, y los cambios conductuales podrían no ser consecuencia del aprendizaje. Así, la conducta se convierte en un espejo distorsionado de lo que el organismo tiene en su cabeza, y los investigadores en aprendizaje ponen un gran esfuerzo en diseñar las condiciones de control que aseguren que lo que refleja el espejo es el proceso de aprendizaje y no otra cosa. Presento aquí mi tributo a Robert Rescorla y su habilidad única para utilizar diseños ingeniosos que permiten diferenciar entre distintos procesos de aprendizaje a través de la conducta. Como hilo conductor utilizaré la investigación acerca de los contenidos del aprendizaje, conectando los resultados de la investigación de Rescorla con animales no humanos con resultados recientes en los mismos asuntos en el campo del aprendizaje asociativo humano.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Balsam, P., & Tomie, A. (Eds.). (2014). Context and learning. Psychology Press.
  • Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear. Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 5, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-403.5.4.368
  • Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear. Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 5, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.368
  • Bouton, M. E., & Todd, T. P. (2014). A fundamental role for context in instrumental learning and extinction. Behavioural processes, 104, 13–19. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.012
  • Brogden w. J. (1947). Sensory pre-conditioning of human subjects. Journal of experimental psychology, 37, 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058465
  • Colwill, R. M. (1993). An Associative Analysis of Instrumental Learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772598
  • Colwill, R. M. (1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 1–72). New York: Academic Press.
  • Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11(1), 120–132. https://doi. org/10.1037/0097-7403.11.1.120
  • Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1986). Associative structures in instrumental learning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 20, 55-104.
  • Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 155–164. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0097-7403.14.2.155
  • Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 71–82. http://dx.doi. org/10.3758/BF03205241
  • Cousins L. S., Zamble E., Tait R. W., Suboski M. D. (1971). Sensory preconditioning in curarized rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 77, 152-154. doi: 10.1037/h0031586. PMID: 5120679.
  • Delamater, A.R. Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior 24, 437–449 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199015
  • Finch, G. (1938). Salivary conditioning in atropinized dogs. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 124, 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1152/ ajplegacy.1938.124.1.136
  • Gámez, A. M., León, S. P., Moreno-Fernández, M. M., & Rosas, J. M. (2020). The state of transfer of stimulus control after extinction in human instrumental conditioning: A key factor in therapy strategies based in nonhuman animal research. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 74, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000220
  • Gámez, A. M., León, S. P., & Rosas, J. M. (2017). Roles of context in acquisition of human instrumental learning: Implications for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying context-switch effects. Learning & Behavior, 45, 211- 227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0256-8
  • Gámez, A. M., Martos, R., Abad, M. J., & Rosas, J. M. (2013). Associative relationships in human predictive learning. The Spanish journal of psychology, 16. https:// doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.7
  • Gámez, A. M., & Rosas, J. M. (2005). Transfer of stimulus control across instrumental responses is attenuated by extinction in human instrumental conditioning. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 5, 207-222. Retrieved from http://www.ijpsy.com/volumen5/num3/120/ transfer-of-stimuluscontrol-across-instrumental-EN.pdf
  • Gámez, A. M.,& Rosas, J. M. (2007). Associations in human instrumental conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 38, 242-261. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.lmot.2006.11.001
  • Guthrie, E. R. (1935). Psychology of Learning. Harper.
  • Holland P. C. (2008). Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Learning & behavior, 36, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.3758/lb.36.3.227
  • Holland, P. C. (1983). “Occasion-setting” in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Volume 4. Discrimination processes (pp. 183-206). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Holland, P. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1975). The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.1.4.355
  • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Köhler, W. (1960). Dynamics in psychology. WW Norton & Company.
  • Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lattal, K.M., Nakajima, S. Overexpectation in appetitive Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 351–360 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199227
  • Loucks, R. B. (1935). The experimental delimitation of neural structures essential for learning: the attempt to condition striped muscle responses with faradization of the sigmoid gyri. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 1, 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1935.9917239
  • Paredes-Olay, C., Abad, M. J., Gámez, M., & Rosas, J. M. (2002). Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding. Animal learning & behavior, 30, 239-248. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192833
  • Pavlov, I.P. (1927) Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. Translated and Edited by G. V. Anrep. Oxford University Press, London, 142.
  • Rescorla, R.A. & Wagner, A.R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, pp. 64–99, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1970). Reduction in the effectiveness of reinforcement after prior excitatory conditioning. Learning & Motivation, 1, 372-381. https://doi. org/10.1016/0023-9690(70)90101-3
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Effects of US habituation following conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 82, 137–143. https://doi. org/10.1037/h0033815
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Effect of inflation of the unconditioned stimulus value following conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035964
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1984). Associations between Pavlovian CSs and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 195–204. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.10.2.195
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1986). Extinction of facilitation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.12.1.16
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1991). Associations of multiple outcomes with an instrumental response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.17.4.465
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1992). Associations between an instrumental discriminative stimulus and multiple outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.18.1.95
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1993a). Inhibitory associations between S and R in extinction. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 327–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ bf03197998
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1993b). Preservation of response-outcome associations through extinction. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.3758/ BF03197988
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1997). Spontaneous recovery after Pavlovian conditioning with multiple outcomes. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 99-107. https://doi. org/10.3758/BF03199028
  • Rescorla, R. A. (2006). Deepened extinction from compound stimulus presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.135
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Freberg, L. (1978). The extinction of within-compound flavor associations. Learning and Motivation, 9, 411-427. https://doi. org/10.1016/0023-9690(78)90003-6
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Heth, C. D. (1975). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.1.1.88
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological review, 74, 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024475
  • Robbins, S. J. (1990). Mechanisms underlying spontaneous recovery in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.16.3.235
  • Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 341-348. https:// doi.org/10.3758/BF03198982
  • Rosas, J. M., Gámez, A. M., León, S. P., Tirado, G. G., & Nelson, J. B. (2017). Of Rats and People: A Select Comparative Analysis of Cue Competition, the Contents of Learning, and Retrieval. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 17(2), 223-244. Retrieved from https://www.ijpsy.com/volumen17/ num2/469/of-rats-and-people-a-select-comparative-EN.pdf
  • Rosas, J. M., Paredes-Olay, M. C., García-Gutiérrez, A., Espinosa, J. J., & Abad, M. J. F. (2010). Outcome-specific transfer between predictive and instrumental learning is unaffected by extinction but reversed by counterconditioning in human participants. Learning and Motivation, 41, 48–66. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lmot.2009.09.002
  • Rozeboom, W. W. (1958). “What is Learned?”—An empirical enigma. Psychological Review, 65, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045256
  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis.AppletonCentury.
  • Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056975
  • Spence, K. W. (1950). Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Psychological Review, 57(3), 159- 72. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0058250
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence. Experimental studies. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Thrailkill, E. A., & Bouton, M. E. (2015). Contextual control of instrumental actions and habits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41, 69-80. doi: 10.1037/xan0000045. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
  • Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. Century/Random House UK.
  • Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, C. H. (1930). Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 257–275.
  • Trapold, M. A., & Overmier, J. B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. En A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory (pp. 427–452). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
  • Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N.E. Spear & R.R. Miller Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms, 5-47. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315798820
  • Wagner, A. R. & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In M. S. Halliday & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Inhibition and learning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (1989). Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). In S. B. Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory (p. 149–189). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet