A competence-based constructivist tool for evaluation

  1. Ramos Alvarez, Manuel M.
  2. Luque Agulló, Gloria
Revue:
Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

ISSN: 1135-6405 1578-4118

Année de publication: 2010

Volumen: 22

Número: 3

Pages: 329-344

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1174/113564010804932148 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

Résumé

Recently the educational system in general, and the university in particular, have suffered a transformation in the way learning, teaching, and subsequently, evaluation are considered due to changes in the European context, including the Bologna Declaration and the constructivist view of learning. There are several adjustments required to implement successfully traditional university teaching practices, such as the use of new technologies in teaching, new ways of tutoring, different groupings, the teaching of competencies and social skills, and, as a result, new forms of evaluation, which constitute the object of this paper. Thus, we show an objective alternative -or complement- to traditional evaluation: a very exhaustive tool for evaluating oral and written presentations which includes four sections: general aspects, contents, questions concerning design and layout, and psychological aspects concerning general competencies. Throughout the paper, the constructivist notions of learning, teaching and evaluation are substantiated and validated with the use of this tool for group or individual presentations or end-of-degree dissertations.

Références bibliographiques

  • ACEVEDO, J. A. (1996). La formación del profesorado de Enseñanza Secundaria y la educación CTS. Una cuestión problemática (Electronic version). Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 26, 131-144.
  • ANDERSON, J. R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York: Freeman.
  • AUSUBEL, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Hold, Reinhart & Winston.
  • BRUNER, J. (1983). Child's Talk. New York: Norton.
  • COOPER, P. A. (1993). Paradigm Shifts in Designed Instruction: From Behaviorism to Cognitivism to Constructivism. Educational Technology, 33 (5), 12-19.
  • DE MENDOZA, R. A., DOMÍNGUEZ, R. D., & MARTÍN, E. (2002). Metodología docente utilizada por el profesorado universitario/Teaching strategies used by University lecturers. Cultura y Educación, 14 (2), 177-186.
  • ERTMER, P. A. & NEWBY, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6 (4), 50-72.
  • GONZÁLEZ, O. (2000). Evaluación Basada en Competencias. Revista de Investigación, 53, 11-31. Retrieved from http://www.redes- cepalcala.org/inspector/DOCUMENTOS%20Y%20LIBROS/COMPETENCIAS/ EV%20BASADA%20EN%20COMPETENCIAS.pdf, December 7, 2009.
  • JONASSEN, D. H., MAYES, T., & MCALEESE, R. (1993). A manifesto for a constructivist approach to technology in higher education. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning (pp. 231-248). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  • KARAGIORGI, Y., & SYMEOU, L. (2005). Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design: Potential and Limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (1), 17-27.
  • MANASSERO, M., VÁZQUEZ, A., & ACEVEDO, J. A. (2004). Evaluación de las actitudes del profesorado respecto a los temas CTS: Nuevos avances metodológicos (Electronic version). Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 22 (2), 299-312.
  • MÁRQUEZ, R. (2004) El sistema de créditos europeos. Su aplicación práctica a la titulación de Lingüí stica de la Universidad de Cádiz. Cádiz: Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • MARTÍN, E. (1999). Estrategias de aprendizaje y asesoramiento psicopedagógico. In J. I. Pozo & C. Monereo (Eds.), El aprendizaje estratégico (pp. 339-357). Madrid: Aula XXI, Santillana.
  • MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN (1998). Currículo Básico Nacional. Programa de Estudio de Educación Básica. Caracas Segunda: Etapa.
  • MOALLEM, M. (2001). Applying Constructivist and Objectivist Learning Theories in the Design of A Web-Based Course: Implications for Practice. Educational Technology & Society, 4 (3), 113-125.
  • MONEREO, C. & POZO, J. I. (2001). Competencias para sobrevivir en el siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 298, 50-55.
  • MONEREO, C. & POZO, J. I. (2007). Competencias para (con)vivir con el siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 370, 12-18.
  • MONTANERO, M., MATEOS, V. L., GÓMEZ, V., & ALEJO, R. (2006) Orientaciones para la elaboración del plan docente de una asignatura. Guía Extensa 2006. Universidad de Extremadura: Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • MOSELEY, D., BAUMFIELD, V., ELLIOTT, J., GREGSON, M., HIGGINS, S., MILLER, J., & NEWTON, D. (2005). Frameworks for Thinking. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • PALINCSAR, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
  • PEREZ, J. (2009). Competences in Language Teaching: From their Conceptualization to their Concretion in the Curriculum. In M. L. Pérez (Ed.), English Language Teaching in the European Credit Transfer System (pp. 93-110). Berlin: Peter Lang.
  • PIAGET, J. (1970). The Child's Conception of Movement and Speed. London: Routhledge & Kegan Paul.
  • POZO, J. I. & MONEREO, C. (1999). El aprendizaje estratégico. Madrid: Aula XXI, Santillana.
  • STRICKLAND, B. (Ed.) (2001). The Gale encyclopedia of psychology, 2nd edition. Detroit: Gale.
  • VALLVERDÚ, J. (2009a). 'Aprendiendo enseñando con el Power Point'. In G. Puigvert (Coord.). Guía para la Evaluación de Competencias en el Área de Humanidades. Barcelona: Agència per a la Qualitat del Sistema Universitary de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://www.aqu.cat/publicacions/guies-competencies/index-es.html, December 7, 2009.
  • VALLVERDÚ, J. (2009b). 'Redactemos un artículo'. In G. Puigvert (Coord.) Guía para la Evaluación de Competencias en el Área de Humanidades. Barcelona: Agéncia per a la Qualitat del Sistema Universitary de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://www.aqu.cat/ publicacions/guies-competencies/index-es.html, December 7, 2009.
  • VIGHNARAJAH, WONG, S. L., & KAMARIAH, A. B. (2008). The Shift in the Role of Teachers in the Learning Process. European Journal of Social Sciences. 7 (2), 33-41.
  • VYGOTSKY, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • WAKEFORD, R. (2003). Principles of student assessment. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (2003, 2nd.Ed.), A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp 42-61). London: Kogan Page.
  • WESTERA, W. (2001). Competences in education: a confusion of tongues. Curriculum Studies, 33, 75-88.