Analysis of the educational impact of M-Learning and related scientific research

  1. Javier Fombona Cadavieco 1
  2. María Angeles Pascual Sevillano 1
  3. Miguel Pérez Ferra 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revista:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 9

Número: 2

Páginas: 167-180

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2020.7.470 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Resumen

La elevada penetración e impacto mundial de los dispositivos móviles obliga a la comunidad científica a hacer análisis rigurosos sobre las implicaciones de este fenómeno. Así, desde el contexto académico es necesario determinar sus efectos reales y cuáles son sus usos más adecuados para su aprovechamiento en la gestión de la información y la construcción del conocimiento. Para ello se examinan las recientes investigaciones sobre el tema del aprendizaje móvil y se realiza un análisis descriptivo de una muestra de registros indexados en la plataforma de investigación de Web of Science en el periodo 2015-2016. El exhaustivo análisis de contenido sobre estos registros ha destacado nuevos aspectos relevantes, como las áreas temáticas de mayor impacto, la irrupción de nuevas metodologías de interacción social en Educación Secundaria, formas emergentes de relaciones colaborativas, el trabajo con perfiles de estudiantes bien delimitados y el uso de innovaciones en espacios inmersivos virtuales en la Educación Superior. La investigación también pone especial relieve en la aparición de nuevas, desconocidas y transcendentes problemáticas derivadas del M-learning, como son las adicciones y las interferencias en el aula, que afectan sobre todo a los jóvenes estudiantes. Finalmente, nuestro estudio sugiere que la formación de los docentes podría recoger estas propuestas tecnológicas e incluirlas en sus estrategias. De hecho, sería preciso invertir el proceso, siendo la iniciativa educativa la que diseñe y genere específicamente pautas innovadoras en la gestión de estas formas y contenidos.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Funded by: Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain Funder Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 Award: EDU2015-70491-R

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033
  • Alrasheedi, M., Capretz, L. F., & Raza, A. (2016). Management’s Perspective on Critical Success Factors Affecting Mobile Learning in Higher Education Institutions—An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0735633115620387
  • Amara, S., Macedo, J., Bendella, F., & Santos, A. (2016). Group formation in mobile computer supported collaborative learning contexts: A systematic lit-erature review. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 258–273.
  • Ávila, H. (1999). Introduction to Research Methodology. México: Technological Institute Cuauhtémoc.
  • Burden, K., & Hopkins, P. (2016). Barriers and Challenges Facing Pre-Service Teachers use of Mobile Technologies for Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2016040101
  • Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2016). Conceptualising authentic Mobile Learning. In D. Churchill, J. Lu, T. K. Chiu, & B. Fox (Eds.),Mobile Learning design: Theories and application (pp. 27–42). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_2
  • Castro, G. G., Dominguez, E. L., Velazquez, Y. H., Matla, M. Y. R., Toledo, C. B. E., & Hernandez, S. E. P. (2016). MobiLearn: Context-Aware Mobile Learning System. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14(2), 958–964. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2016.7437246
  • Chang, Y., Chien, Y. H., Yu, K., Lin, H., & Chen, M. (2016). Students’ innovative environmental perceptions and creative performances in cloud-based M-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.032
  • Chauhan, V. S., Bansal, R., & Ahuja, M. (2015). Comparison of efficacy and tolerance of shortduration open-ended ureteral catheter drainage and tamsulosin administration to indwelling double J stents following ureteroscopic removal of stones. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 21(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj144292
  • Chiu, P.-S., Pu, Y.-H., Kao, C.-C., Wu, T.-T., & Huang, Y.-M. (2018). An authentic learning based evaluation method for mobile learning in Higher Education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1417147
  • Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., &Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003
  • Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2015). ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9526 -4
  • Fombona, J., Coto, V., & Caldevilla, D. (2015). Mobile Augmented Reality interaction: an approach to the phenomenon. Informação & Sociedade: Estu-dos, 25(3), 117–129.
  • Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/jcal.12071
  • Gimhyesuk. (2016). A study on mobile application design for English vocabulary learning. The Journal of Linguistics Science, 78, 67–99. https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2016.09.78.67
  • Hackett, M., & Proctor, M. (2016). Three-Dimensional Display Technologies for Anatomical Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9619-3
  • Huang, T., Chen, C., & Chou, Y. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008
  • Kaiiali, M., Ozkaya, A., Altun, H., Haddad, H., & Alier, M. (2016). Designing a Secure Exam Management System (SEMS) for M-Learning Environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2016.2524570
  • Karimi, S. (2016). Do learners’ characteristics matter? An exploration of mobile-learning adoption in self-directed learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 769–776. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.chb.2016.06.014
  • Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Rai, T. (2015). Investigating teachers’ adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Computers & Education, 80, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08 .009
  • Kopecky, K., & Szotkowski, R. (2016). Use of mobile touch devices as part of lifelong learning with specific focus on tablets. ICLEL 2015 Conference on Lifelong Learning and Leadership for All (pp. 221–225).
  • Liu, G., Lu, H., & Lai, C. (2016). Towards the construction of a field: The developments and implications of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL). Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31(1), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu070
  • Lu, S., & Liu, Y. (2015). Integrating Augmented Reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
  • Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Jorrin-Abellan, I. M., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Martinez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Supporting Teacher Orchestration in Ubiquitous Learning Environments: A Study in Primary Education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2014.2370634
  • Navarro, C. X., Molina, A., Redondo, M. A., & Juarez-Ramirez, R. (2016). Framework to Evaluate M-Learning Systems: A Technological and Pedagogical Approach. RITA-IEEE, 11(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/rita.2016.2518459
  • Olivia-Dumitrina, N., Casanovas, M., & Capdevila, Y. (2019). Academic Writing and the Internet: Cyber-Plagiarism amongst University Students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 112–112. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.407
  • Pejoska, J., Bauters, M., Purma, J., & Leinonen, T. (2016). Social augmented reality: Enhancing context-dependent communication and informal learning at work. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12442
  • Pérez, A., Pérez-Ferra, M., Fombona, J., González, J., López, R., Sierra, B., & Neira, M. (2019). Evaluación y desarrollo de las competencias comunicativa y digital en estudiantes del grado de maestro. Barcelona: Graó.
  • Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
  • Reychav, I., Dunaway, M., & Kobayashi, M. (2015). Understanding mobile technology-fit behaviors outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 87, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2015.04.005
  • Rodrigo, L. (2016). The didactic and methodological use of tablets in classrooms of primary and secondary education in Catalonia. Pixel-Bit, 48, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.01
  • Roig-Vila, R., Lorenzo-Lledó, A., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2019). Utilidad percibida de la realidad aumentada como recurso didáctico en Edu-cación Infantil. Campus virtuales, 8(1), 19–35.
  • Sakr, M., Jewitt, C., & Price, S. (2016). Mobile Experiences of Historical Place: A Multimodal Analysis of Emotional Engagement. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 51–92. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1115761
  • Salcines-Talledo, I., González-Fernández, N., & Briones, E. (2020). The Smartphone as a Pedagogic Tool. Student Profiles as related to its Use and Knowledge. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.1.454
  • Suárez-Guerrero, C., Lloret-Catalá, C., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the digital transformation of the classroom through the use of tablets: A study in spain. Comunicar, 49, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-08
  • Sung, Y., Changb, K., & Liua, T. (2016). The effect of flow experience on English listening and self-directed learning abilities through a listening activity using a smartphone application. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 19(3), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2016 .19.3.158
  • UNESCO. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education, compendium of promising initiatives: Mobile Learning Week. Paris: Author.
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Sevillano, M., & Fombona, J. (2016). Analysis of the educa-tional and social use of digital devices in the pan-Hispanic university con-text. Revista De Investigación Educativa, 34(2), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.2.224691
  • Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104. https:// doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
  • West, M., & Vosloo, S. (2013). The policy guidelines for mobile learning. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Yang, X., Li, X., & Lu, T. (2015). Using mobile phones in college classroom settings: Effects of presentation mode and interest on concentration and achievement. Computers & Education, 88, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.007
  • Yousafzai, A., Chang, V., Gani, A., & Noor, R. M. (2016). Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.010
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet