Context switch effects and Context Experience in Rats’ Conditioned Taste Aversion

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahlers, S. T., & Richardson, R. (1985). Administration of dexamethasone prior to training blocks ACTH-induced recovery of an extinguished avoidance response. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99, 760-764.
• Archer, T., Sjödén, P. O., & Nilsson, L. G. (1985). Contextual control of taste-aversion conditioning and extinction. En P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and Learning. New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Archer, T., Sjödén, P. O., Nilsson, L. G., & Carter, N. (1979). Role of exteroceptive background context in taste-aversion conditioning and extinction. Animal Learning & Behavior. 7, 17-22.
• Balaz, A. M., Capra, S., Kasprow, W. J., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Latent inhibition of the conditioning context: Further evidence of contextual potentiation of retrieval in the absence of appreciable context-US associations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 242-248.
• Bills, C., Smith, S., Myers, & N., Schachtman, T. R. (2003). Effects of context exposure during conditioning on conditioned taste aversions. Learning & Behavior, 31, 369-377.
• Bonardi, C., Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1990). Context specificity of conditioning in flavoraversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229-237.
• Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interferente paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
• Bouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219-231.
• Bouton, M. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In M. E. Bouton & M. S. Fanselow (Eds.), Learning, motivation and cognition: The functional behaviourism of Robert C. Bolles (385-409). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Bouton, M. E. (2007). Context: The concept in the human and animal memory domains. In H. L. Roediger, Y. Dudai, & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of Memory: Concepts (pp. 115-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bouton, M. E. (2010). The multiple forms of “context” in associative learning theory. In B. Mesquita, L. Feldman Barrett, & E. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 233-258). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Bouton, M. E., Kenney, F. A., & Rosengard, C. (1990). State-dependent fear extinction with two benzodiazepine tranquilizers. Behavioral 3euroscience, 104, 44-55.
• Bouton, M. E., Nelson, J. B., & Rosas, J. M. (1999). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
• Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasionsetting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333-350.
• Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., & Rosas, J. M. (2010). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 482-494.
• Chelonis, J. J., Calton, J. L., Hart, J. A., & Schachtman, T. R. (1999). The renewal effect in conditioned taste aversion. Learning and Motivation, 30, 1-14.
• Darby, R. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143-154.
• Davidson, T. L. (1993). The nature and function of interoceptive signals to feed: Toward integration of physiological and learning perspectives. Psychological Review. 100, 640-657.
• Eich, E. (2007). Context: Mood, memory and the concept of context. In H. L. Roediger, Y. Dudai, & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of Memory: Concepts (pp. 107-110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fanselow, M. S. (2007). Context: What’s so special about it? In H. L. Roediger, Y. Dudai, & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of Memory: Concepts (pp. 101-105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hall, G., & Honey, R. C. (1990). Context-specific conditioning in the conditionedemotional-response procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 271-278.
• Hamid, O., Wendemuth, A., & Braun J. (2010). Temporal context and conditional associative learning. BMC Neuroscience, 11:45. Retrieved January 24, 2011, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/11/45.
• Hermans, D., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., & Lovibond, P. F. (2006). Extinction in human fear conditioning. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 361-368.
• Holder, M. D. (1988a). Possible role of confounded taste stimuli in conditioned taste aversions. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 231-234.
• Holder, M. D. (1988b). Reply to Sjödén and Archer. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 240–241.
• Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In: Commons, M. L., Herrnstein, R. J., Wagner, A. R. (eds.) Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Discrimination Processes (Vol. 4, pp. 183-206). New York: Ballinger.
• Holland, P. C. (1992). Ocassion Setting in pavlovian conditioning. In D. L. Medin (Ed). The Psychology of Learning, and Motivation, 28 (pp. 69-125). San Diego, CA: Academic press.
• Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812-863.
• Kurz, E. M., & Levitsky D. A. (1982). Novelty of contextual cues in taste aversion learning. Animal Learning & Behavior; 10, 229-32.
• Lattal, K. M. (2007). Effects of ethanol on the encoding, consolidation, and expression of extinction following contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral 3euroscience, 121, 1280-1292.
• León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2008). Retrieval of simple cue-outcome relationships is context-specific within informative contexts. Escritos de Psicología, 2, 63-71.
• León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2010a). Giving contexts informative value makes information context specific. Experimental Psychology, 57, 46-53.
• León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2010b). The effect of context change on simple acquisition disappears with increased training. Psicológica, 31, 49-63.
• León, S. P., Abad, M. J. F., & Rosas, J. M. (2011). Context-outcome associations mediate context-switch effects in a human predictive learning task. Learning and Motivation, 42, 84-98.
• Loy, I., Alvarez, R., Rey, V., & Lopez, M. (1993). Context–US associations rather than occasion setting in taste aversion learning. Learning & Motivation, 24, 55-72.
• Lubow, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
• McLaren, I. P. L., Bennett, C., Plaisted, K., Aitken, M., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1994). Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 387-400.
• Myers, C. E., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Context, conditioning and hippocampal rerepresentation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835-847.
• Nakajima, S., Kobayashi, Y., & Imada, H. (1995). Contextual control of taste aversion in rats: The effects of context extinction. The Psychological Record. 45, 309-319.
• Nelson, J. B. & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 314-326.
• Nelson, J. B., Sanjuan, M. C., Vadillo-Ruiz, S., Pérez, J., & León, S. P. (2011). Experimental renewal in human participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 58-70.
• Paredes-Olay, C., & Rosas, J. M. (1999). Within-subjects extinction and renewal in predictive judgments. Psicológica, 20, 195-210.
• Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
• Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
• Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
• Pineño, O., & Miller, R. R. (2004). Signalling a change in cue–outcome relations in human associative learning. Learning and Behavior, 32, 360-375.
• Preston, G. C., Dickinson, A., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1986). Contextual conditional discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 38B(2), 217-237.
• Puente, G. P., Cannon, D. S., Best, M. R., & Carrell, L. E. (1988). Occasion setting of fluid ingestion by contextual cues. Learning and Motivation, 19, 239-253.
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. R. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning, Vol. 2: current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Riccio, D. C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 152-165.
• Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal or Experimental Psychology: Animal Beahavior Processes, 23, 283-294.
• Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion extinction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 79-83.
• Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 461-474.
• Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). Acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion becomes context dependent when it is learned alter extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 9-15.
• Rosas, J. M., Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., & Fernández-Abad, M. J. (2006). Revision of retrieval theory of forgetting: What does make information context-specific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 147-166.
• Rosas, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Effects of context change upon first and second-learned information in human predictive learning. Psicológica, 27, 35-56.
• Rosas, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Psicológica, 28, 129-150.
• Rosas, J. M., Vila, N. J., Lugo, M., & López, L. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 153-164.
• Sjödén, P., & Archer, T. (1988a). Exteroceptive cues in taste-aversion learning, no artifact: Reply to Holder. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 235-239.
• Sjödén, P., & Archer, T. (1988b). Contextual cues in taste-aversion learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 242-243.
• Sjödén, P., & Archer, T. (1989). Taste-aversion conditioning: The role of contextual stimuli. In T. Archer & L. G. Nilsson (Eds.), Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety perspectives on aversively motivated behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Smith, S. M. (2001). Enviromental context-dependent memory: A review and metaanalysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203-220.
• Spear, N. E., & Riccio, D. C. (1994). Memory: Phenomena and principles. Needham Heights, MA, US: Allyn & Bacon.
• Urcelay, G. P., Miller, R. R. (2010). Two roles of the context in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 268-80.
• Vervliet, B., Vansteenwegen, D., & Hermans, D. (2010). Unpaired shocks during extinction weaken the contextual renewal of a conditioned discrimination. Learning and Motivation, 41, 22-31.
• Vila, N. J., & Rosas, J. M. (2001). Renewal and spontaneous recovery after extinction in a causal learning task. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 27, 79-96.
• Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Willner, J. A. (1978). Blocking of a taste aversion by prior pairings of exteroceptive stimuli with illness. Learning and Motivation, 9, 125-140.