Assessment of implicit anti-fat and pro-slim attitudes in young women using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP)

  1. Paloma Maroto Expósito
  2. Mónica Hernández López
  3. Miguel Rodríguez Valverde
Journal:
International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

ISSN: 1577-7057

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 15

Issue: 3

Pages: 17-32

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

Abstract

Research on implicit attitudes to both male and female body size has produced evidence for the existence of an attitudinal bias in the form of preference for images of thinness over images of fatness. Specifically, studies that have employed the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) have shown that this bias is specifically attributable to a pro-slim attitude, rather than to an anti-fat one. It is not clear, however, if the same type of specific pro-slim bias will be found when attitudes are measured exclusively for female participants and only to female targets. The present study has employed the IRAP for the assessment of implicit attitudes towards fatness and slimness in a sample of 40 Spanish young female college students. The task required participants to respond relationally in alternating trial-blocks. In pro-slim/anti-fat blocks, they had to respond as if photos of underweight women were pleasant and photos of overweight women were unpleasant. In anti-fat/pro-slim blocks they had to respond according to the opposite pattern (overweight as pleasant and underweight as unpleasant). Additionally, participants had to produce explicit ratings of pleasantness for the same photos used in the IRAP (with a visual analogue scale: VAS), and answer measures of body dissatisfaction (the Body Shape Questionnaire: BSQ) and of eating disorders symptomatology (the Eating Attitudes Test: EAT-40). Results showed no evidence of implicit bias for body size (neither pro-slim nor anti-fat). Besides, no significant correlations were found between implicit and explicit measures. These results are consistent with prior evidence suggesting that women show less anti-fat prejudice than men, and with studies that find less anti-fat bias in Spanish population than in Anglo-Saxon population.

Bibliographic References

  • Ahern AL & Hetherington MM (2006). The thin ideal and body image: an experimental study of implicit attitudes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 338-342.
  • Anselmi P, Vianello M, & Robusto E (2013). Preferring thin people does not imply derogating fat people. A Rasch Analysis of the implicit weight attitude. Obesity, 21, 261-265.
  • Bacardi Gascón M, León Reyes M, & Jiménez Cruz A (2007). Stigmatization of overweight Mexican children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 38, 99-105.
  • Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Hayden E, Milne R, Power P, & Steward, I (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169-177.
  • Barnes-Holmes D, Waldron D, Barnes-Holmes Y, & Stewart I (2009). Testing the validity of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Measuring attitudes towards Dublin and country life in Ireland. The Psychological Record, 59, 389-406.
  • Bassett DR, Pucher J, Buehler R, Thompson DL, & Crouter SE (2008). Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5, 795-814.
  • Brochu PM & Morrison MA (2007). Implicit and explicit prejudice toward overweight and average weight men and women: Testing their correspondence and relation to behavioral intentions. Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 681-706.
  • Brownell KD, Puhl RM, Schwarz MB, & Rudd, L (2005). Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, and Remedies. New York: Guilford Press. Carels RA & Musher-Eizenman DR (2010). Individual differences and weight bias: do people with an anti-fat bias have pro-thin bias? Body Image, 7, 143-148.
  • Castro J, Toro J, Salamero M, & Guimerá E (1991). The Eating Attitudes Test: Validation of the Spanish version. Evaluación Psicológica/Psychological Assessment, 7, 175-189.
  • Cooper PJ, Taylor MJ, Cooper Z, & Fairburn CG (1987). The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 485-494.
  • Crandall CS (1994). Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 882-894.
  • De Houwer J (2002). The implicit association test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115-133.
  • De Irala J, Cano-Prous A, Lahortiga-Ramos F, Gual García P, Martínez González MA, & Cervera Enguix S (2008). Validación del cuestionario Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) como prueba de cribado de trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en la población general. Medicina Clínica, 130, 487-491.
  • Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Johnson C, Johnson B, & Howard A (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Implicit and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
  • Fazio R & Olson M (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
  • Ferguson C, Kornblet S, & Muldoon A (2009). Not all are created equal: Differences in obesity attitudes between men and women. Women’s Health Issues, 19, 289-291.
  • Gapinski KD, Schwartz MB, & Brownell KD (2006). Can television change anti-fat attitudes and behaviour? Journal of Applied BioBehavioural Research, 11, 1-28.
  • Garner DM & Garfinkel PE (1979). The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9, 273-279.
  • Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, & Garfinkel PE (1982). The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871-878. Green SP & Pritchard ME (2003). Predictors of body image dissatisfaction in adult men and women. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 215-222.
  • Greenwald AG, McGhee AD, & Schwartz JL (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
  • Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, & Banaji MR (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
  • Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, & Banaji MR (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
  • Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, & Roche B (2001). Relational Frame Theory: a post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. New York: Kluwer/Plenum. Holtgraves T (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 161-172.
  • Hughes S & Barnes-Holmes D (2013). A functional approach to the study of implicit cognition: the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. In S Dymond & B Roche (Eds.) Advances in Relational Frame Theory. Research and Applications (pp. 97-125). Oakland, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications
  • Hughes S, Barnes-Holmes D, & De Houwer J (2011). The dominance of associative theorizing in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. The Psychological Record, 61, 465-496.
  • Juarascio AS, Forman EM, Timko CA, Herbert JD, Butryn M, & Lowe M (2011). Implicit internalization of the thin ideal as a predictor of increases in weight, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating. Eating Behaviors, 12, 207-213.
  • Magallares A & Morales JF (2013). Gender differences in antifat attitudes. Revista de Psicología Social/ International Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 113-119.
  • Magallares A, Morales JF, & Rubio MA (2011). The effect of work discrimination on the well-being of obese people. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 255-267.
  • Magallares A, Morales JF, & Rubio MA (2014). Group identification, discrimination and psychological health in an obese sample. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 421-431.
  • McKenna IM, Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, & Stewart I (2007). Testing the fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The first study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 253-268.
  • Murphy C, MacCarthaigh S, & Barnes-Holmes D (2014). Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and attractiveness bias: directionality of bias and influence of gender of participants. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 333-351. Nisbett RE & Wilson TD (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
  • Nolan J, Murphy C, & Barnes-Holmes D (2013). Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and Bodyweight bias: influence of gender of participants and targets. The Psychological Record, 63, 467-488.
  • Parling T, Cernvall M, Stewart I, Barnes-Holmes D, & Ghaderi A (2013). Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to compare implicit pro-thin/anti-fat attitudes of patients with Anorexia Nervosa and Non-clinical controls. Eating Disorders, 20, 127-143.
  • Paxton SJ, Wertheim EH, Gibbons K, Szmukler GI, Hillier L, & Petrovich JL (1991). Body image satisfaction, dieting beliefs, and weight loss behaviors in adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Young and Adolescence, 20, 361-379.
  • Puhl R & Brownell KD (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788-805.
  • Puhl R & Heuer C (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17, 941-964.
  • Raich RM, Mora M, Soler A, Ávila C, Clos I, & Zapater L (1996). Adaptación de un instrumento de evaluación de la insatisfacción corporal. Clínica y Salud, 7, 51-66.
  • Roddy S, Stewart I, & Barnes-Holmes D (2010). Anti-fat, pro-slim, or both? Using two reaction-time based measures to assess implicit attitudes to the slim and overweight. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 416-425.
  • Roddy S, Stewart I, & Barnes-Holmes D (2011). Facial reactions reveal that slim is good but fat is not bad: Implicit and explicit measures of body-size bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 688-694.
  • Rozin P & Fallon A (1988). Body image, attitudes to weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: A comparison of men and women in two generations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 342-345.
  • Schwarz MB, O’Neal Chambliss H, Brownell KD, Blair SN, & Billington, C (2003). Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obesity Research, 11, 133-139.
  • Schwarz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, & Brownell KD (2006). The influence of one’s own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity, 14, 444-447. Solbes I & Enesco I (2010). Explicit and implicit anti‐fat attitudes in children and its relationship with their body image. Obesity Facts, 3, 23‐32.
  • Stice E & Whitenton K (2002). Risk factor for body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls: a longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 669-678.
  • Teachman BA & Brownell KD (2001). Implicit antifat bias among health professionals: Is anyone immune? International Journal of Obesity, 25, 1525-1531.
  • Teachman BA, Gapinski KD, Brownell KD, Rawlins M, & Jeyaram S (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: the impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68-78. Thompson JK & Stice E (2001). Thin-ideal internalization: mounting evidence for a new risk-factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 181-183.
  • Timko CA, England EL, Herbert, JD, & Forman EV (2010). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a measure of self-esteem. The Psychological Record, 60, 679-698.
  • Tomiyama AJ, Finch LE, Incolligo Belsky AC, Buss J, Finley C, et al. (in press). Weight Bias in 2001 versus 2013: contradictory attitudes among obesity researchers and health professionals. Obesity. doi:10.1002/oby.20910
  • Warren CS, Cepeda-Benito A, Gleaves DH, Moreno S, Rodríguez S, Fernández MC, et al. (2008). English and Spanish version of the Body Shape Questionnaire: Measurement equivalence across ethnicity and clinical status. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 265-272.
  • Wilson TD (2009). Know thyself. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 384-389.
  • World Health Organization (1995). Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Geneva: World Heath Organization.
Data source: Dialnet