La construcción descentralizada de datos espacialesriesgos para la calidad de la información geográfica

  1. Ariza López, Francisco Javier
Revista:
Polígonos: Revista de geografía

ISSN: 1132-1202

Ano de publicación: 2015

Título do exemplar: Neogeografía: algo más que cartografía accesible

Número: 27

Páxinas: 187-205

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.18002/POL.V0I27.3284 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Polígonos: Revista de geografía

Resumo

This paper defines what constitutes a «decentralized construction» framework of spatial data. This framework presents some differences with respect to what has been called «decentralized production» framework. First, in order to understand the possible risks due to poor quality, we reinforced the importance of spatial data in decision-making. Subsequently we identify and present some challenges that we understand are the main challenges today: production (commit much), access (accessing with quality), interoperability (enabling the use and legal use), metadata (describing well the products), traceability and metacalidad (maintaining the lineage and information about quality) and preservation (ensuring the future use). The work ends with a brief conclusion in which are identified the main lines of work (standardization, training, leadership, etc.) in order to avoid these risks.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ARIZA-LÓPEZ, F.J.; ARIZA-LÓPEZ, R.M.; UREÑA CÁMARA, M.A.; JOAQUÍN CORTÉS, J. y UREÑA LÓPEZ, L.A. (2012): «Preservación de la Información Geográfica: Perspectivas y situación en España», GeoFocus (Artículos), nº 12, 171-200.
  • BERNERS-LEE, T.; HENDLER, J. y LASSILA, O. (2001): «The Semantic Web». Scientific American. Mayo; 29-37
  • BOS, M.; GOLLIN, H.; GERBER, U.; LEUTHOLD, J. y MEYER, U. (2010): Preliminary study on the archiving of geodata. Berna: Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport, Federal Office of Topography Swisstopo, Federal Department of Home Affairs, Swiss Federal Archives.
  • CEN (1997): ENV 12656: European Prestandard (ENV) 12656. Geographic information Data description Quality del Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN).
  • COMBER, A.J., FISHER y P.F., WADSWORTH, R.A. (2010): «User-focused metadata for spatial data, geographical information and data quality assessments». 10th AGILE Conference
  • GOODCHILD, M.F. (2007): «Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography». GeoJournal 69 (4): 211-221. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
  • ISO (2008): ISO/TS Geographic Information–Terminology. Ginebra.
  • ISO (2013): ISO 19157:2013. Geographic information. Data quality.
  • OGC (2012): OGC Sensor Observation Service (SOS) Standard Version 2.0 Adopted
  • OXERA (1999): The economic contribution of Ordnance Survey GB. Oxford Economic Research Associates Ltd. Oxford.
  • OXERA (2013): What is the economic impact of Geoservices? Prepared for Google.
  • PIRA (2000): Commercial Exploitation of Europe’s Public Sector Information. Pira International, Ltd., University of East Anglia, and Knowledge. Luxembourg.
  • RODRÍGUEZ, A.F.; SEVILLA, C.; ABAD, P.; LÓPEZ, E. y SÁNCHEZ A. (2013): Panorama de la estandarización en el campo de la información geográfica: la importancia de los estándares abiertos. CIGMA 2013, México. http://cigma2013.mx/es/agenda/doc/Paper_Antonio_Federico_Rodriguez_Pascual.pdf
  • RUIZ, J.J.; ARIZA, F.J.; UREÑA, M.A. y BLÁZQUEZ, E.B. (2011): «Digital map conflation: a review of the process and a proposal for classification», International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25:9, 1439-1466, DOI:10.1080/13658816.2010.519707
  • STEINIGER, S. y HUNTER, A.J.S. (2012): «The 2012 free and open source GIS software map – A guide to facilitate research, development, and adoption», Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Volume 39, May 2013, Pages 136-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.10.003.
  • Wikipedia (2013): Smart City. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_city
Fonte de datos: Dialnet