Experimental approach to the study of beautyThe role of golden proportion

  1. A. Félix Vico-Prieto 1
  2. Cagigas Balcaza, Angel Luis
  3. Juan M. Rosas 1
  4. José E. Callejas-Aguilera 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén, Spain
Journal:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 37

Issue: 2

Pages: 187-207

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Abstract

Two experiments evaluated the impact of different deviations from golden proportion on subjective perception of beauty. Black and white adaptations of Mondrian paintings modified to fit golden, 1/6 and 1/2 proportions were used as stimuli. Within each trial, participants were exposed to two versions of the same painting on a computer screen. Participants were given 1500 ms to select the one they considered more beautiful. In experimental trials one of the paintings presented the golden proportion while the other presented either the 1/2 or the1/6 proportion. The two paintings were identical in control trials. University students without formal training in art showed preference for golden ratio stimuli over 1/6 stimuli, but not over 1/2 stimuli, both, when they were tested in within-subject (Experiment 1) and betweensubject (Experiment 2) designs.

Bibliographic References

  • Angier, R. P. (1903). The aesthetics of unequal division. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 4, 541-561.
  • Arnheim, R. (1986). Hacia una psicología del arte. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Benjafield, J. (1976). The golden rectangle: Some new data. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 737-74.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1970). The golden section and hedonic judgments of rectangles: A crosscultural study. Sciences of Art, 7, 1-6.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
  • Berlyne, D. E., & Ogilvie, J. C. (1974). Dimensions of perception of paintings. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation (181-226). Washington D. C.: Hemisphere.
  • Birkhoff, G. D. (1932). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
  • Borissavlievitch, M. (1958). The Golden Number and the scientific aesthetics of architecture. London: Tiranti.
  • Boselie, F. (1992). The golden section has no special aesthetic attractivity! Empirical Studies of the Arts, 10, 1-18.
  • Bouleau, C. (1963). Charpentes: La géométrie secrète des peintres. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  • Brouseau, B. (1968). On the trail of the California pine. Fibonacci Quarterly, 6, 69-76.
  • Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Maestú, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernández, A., Roca, M., Roselló, J. & Quesney, F. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 6321-6325.
  • Corbalán, F. (2010). La proporción áurea. Barcelona: RBA.
  • Deischer, S. (2004). Mondrian. Madrid: Taschen.
  • Delvin, K. (1998). El lenguaje de las matemáticas. Barcelona: Robinbook.
  • Di Dio C., Canessa N., Cappa, S. F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2011). Specificity of esthetic experience for artworks: an FMRI study. Front Human Neuroscience 5: 139
  • Di Dio, C. D., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: Brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS One, 2(11).
  • Doczi. G. (1996): Power of limits: Proportional harmonies in nature, art, and architecture. Buenos Aires: Troquel.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1968). An experimental study of aesthetic preference for polygonal figures. The Journal of General Psychology, 79, 3-17.
  • Feasey, L. (1921). Some experiments of aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 298-302.
  • Fechner, G. T. (1876/1997). Vorschule der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
  • Godkewitsch, M. (1974). The golden section: An artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference. American Journal of Psychology, 87, 269-277.
  • Gordon, K. (1929). A criticism of two of Kant's criteria of the aesthetic. New York: Octagon Books.
  • Green, C. D. (1995). All that glitters: A review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception, 24, 937-968.
  • Hemenway, P. (2008). El código secreto. Barcelona: Evergreen.
  • Jean, R. V. (1992). Model testing in phyllotaxis. Journal of theoretical Biology, 156, 41-62.
  • Konecni, V. J. (1997). The vase on the mantelpiece: The golden section in context. Empirical Studies of Arts, 15, 177-208.
  • Konecni, V. J. (2001). The golden section in the structure of 20th-centrury paintings. Rivista di Psicologia dell'Arte, 22, 27-42.
  • Konecni, V. J. (2003). On the golden section: elusive, but detectable. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 267-276.
  • Lalo, C. (1908). L'esthetique experimentale contemporaine. Paris: Alcan.
  • Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Casey R. J., & Sawin D. B. (1995). Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology, 31, 464-472.
  • Marty, G. (2002). Formación de esquemas en el reconocimiento de estímulos estéticos. Psicothema, 14, 10-25.
  • Marty, G., Munar, E., & Nadal, M. (2005). Familiaridad y evaluación de estímulos estéticos en función de la educación artística. Psicothema, 17, 338-343.
  • Munar, E., Nadal, M., Castellanos, N. P., Flexas, A., Maestú, F., Mirasso, C., & Cela-Conde, C. (2012). Aesthetic appreciation: Event-related field and time-frequency analyses. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1-11.
  • Nadal, M. (2007). Complexity and aesthetic preference for diverse visual stimuli. Doctoral thesis. Departament of Psichology of the Universitat de les Illes Baleares, España.
  • Pacioli, L. (1509/1991). La divina proporción. Madrid: Akal.
  • Pierce. E. (1894). Aesthetics of simple forms. Psychological Review, 1, 483-495.
  • Prado, J. (1989). Entender la pintura. Barcelona: Orbis.
  • Ramachandran, S. (2008). Los laberintos del cerebro. Madrid: Liebre de Marzo.
  • Sigler, L. E. (2002). Fibonacci's Liber abaci. Lewisburg: Burknell University.
  • Stone, L. A., & Collins, L. G. (1965). The golden section revisited: A perimetric explanation. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 503-506
  • Tatarkiewicz, W. (1989). Historia de la estética. Madrid: Akal
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Individual differences in judgments of the beauty of simple forms. Psychological Review, 24, 141-753.
  • Tosto, P. (1983). La composición áurea en las artes plásticas. Buenos Aires: Hachette.
  • Weyl, H. (1991). Simetría. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wiegand, von. C. (1943). The meaning of Mondrian. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2 (62): 70.
  • Witmer, L. (1894). Zur Experimentellen Asthetik Einfacher Raumlicher Formverhaltnisse. Philosophische Studien, 9, 96-144.
Data source: Dialnet