Context specificity of extinguished schedule-induced drinking within an ABA renewal design in rats

  1. José E. Callejas-Aguilera 1
  2. Pedro M. Ogallar 1
  3. Ricardo Pellón 2
  4. Juan M. Rosas 1
  5. Aristizabal Cuellar, Jose Alejandro
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain
  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain
Revista:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 36

Número: 2

Páginas: 337-366

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Resumen

El objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar si la extinción de la bebida adjuntiva inducida por programa (polidipsia) podía quedar bajo control contextual. La bebida se indujo mediante un programa de administración de comida de tiempo fijo 30 segundos (TF30). El experimento 1 utilizó un diseño factorial 2 x 2 con Programa (TF30 vs. comida al inicio de la sesión) y Estímulo (presencia o ausencia de un sonido de 10s al final de cada periodo de 30s dentro de la sesión) como factores. La adquisición y la extinción se realizaron en contextos diferentes, regresando al contexto de adquisición durante la prueba. El experimento 2 introdujo una condición de control que recibió la prueba en el contexto de extinción. La recuperación de la extinción se observó como un aumento en la ingesta de agua (así como en las entradas en el comedero) durante la prueba, independientemente de la presencia del sonido. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados para la interpretación de la bebida inducida por programa como una respuesta condicionada.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, J. D., & Porter, J. H. (1977). Sources of control over schedule-induced drinking produced by second-order schedules of reinforcement. Physiology & Behavior, 18, 853-863. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(77)90194-9.
  • Allen, J. D., Porter, J. H., & Arazie, R. (1975). Schedule-induced drinking as a function of percentage reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 223-232. doi:10.1901/jeab.1975.23-223.
  • Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: Allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 101-124. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101.
  • Boakes, R. A. (1977). Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In H. Davis & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.), Operant-Pavlovian interactions (pp. 67-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Boakes, R. A., Patterson, A. E., Kendig, M. D., & Harris, J. A. (2014). Temporal distributions of schedule-induced licks, magazine entries, and lever presses on fixed-and variable-time schedules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, doi:10.1037/xan0000046.
  • Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80.
  • Bouton, M. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In M. E. Bouton & M. S. Fanselow (Eds.), Learning, motivation and cognition: The functional behaviourism of Robert C. Bolles (385-409). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10223-019.
  • Bouton, M. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976-986. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01546-9.
  • Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10, 445-466. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2.
  • Bouton, M. E., & King, D. A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248-265. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.248.
  • Bouton, M. E., & Ricker, S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317-324. doi:10.3758/BF03209840.
  • Bouton, M. E., Rosengard, C., Achenbach, G. G., Peck, C. A., & Brooks, D. C. (1993). Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 63-95. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401095.
  • Bouton, M. E., & Todd, T. P. (2014). A fundamental role for context in instrumental learning and extinction. Behavioural Processes, 104, 13-19. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.012.
  • Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 366-379. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.20.4.366.
  • Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., & Rosas, J. M. (2010). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 482-494. doi:10.1037/a0018527.
  • Castilla, J. L., & Pellón, R. (2013). Combined effects of food deprivation and food frequency on the amount and temporal distribution of schedule-induced drinking. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 396-407. doi:10.1002/jeab.53.
  • Clark, F. C. (1962). Some observations on the adventitious reinforcement of drinking under food reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 61-63. doi:0.1901/jeab.1962.5-61.
  • Corfield-Sumner, P. K., Blackman, D. E., & Stainer, G. (1977). Polydipsia induced in rats by second-order schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 265-273. doi:10.1901/jeab.1977.27-265.
  • Darby, R. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143-154. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.21.2.143.
  • Falk, J. L. (1961). Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule. Science, 133, 195-196. doi:10.1126/science.133.3447.195.
  • Falk, J. L. (1966). The motivational properties of schedule-induced polydipsia. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 19–25. doi:10.1901/jeab.1966.9-19.
  • Goddard, M. J. (1999). Renewal to the signal value of an unconditioned stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 30, 15-34. doi:10.1006/lmot.1998.1019.
  • Goddard, M. J., & McDowell, J. L. (2001). Context modulation of US signal value. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54B, 219-231. doi:10.1080/02724990143000018.
  • Holder, M. D. (1988). Possible role of confounded taste stimuli in conditioned taste aversions. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 231-234. doi:10.3758/BF03209070.
  • Killeen, P. R., & Pellón, R. (2013). Adjunctive behaviors are operants. Learning & Behavior, 41, 1-24. doi:10.3758/s13420-012-0095-1.
  • Kirkpatrick, K., & Church, R. M. (2000). Stimulus and temporal cues in classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 206-219. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.26.2.206.
  • Laborda, M. A., Witnauer, J. E., & Miller, R. R. (2011). Contrasting AAC and ABC renewal: The role of context associations. Learning & Behavior, 39, 46-56. doi:10.3758/s13420-010-0007-1.
  • Lashley, R. L., & Rosellini, R. A. (1980). Modulation of schedule-induced polydipsia by Pavlovian conditioned states. Physiology & Behavior, 24, 411-414 doi:10.1016/0031-9384(80)90108-0.
  • Lashley, R. L., & Rosellini, R. A. (1987). Associative control of schedule-induced polydipsia. The Psychological Record, 37, 553-561.
  • León, S. P., Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., & Rosas, J. M. (2012). Context switch effects and context experience in rats' conditioned taste aversion. Psicológica, 33, 15-38.
  • López-Crespo, G., Rodríguez, M., Pellón, R., & Flores, P. (2004). Acquisition of scheduleinduced polydipsia by rats in proximity to upcoming food delivery. Learning & Behavior, 32, 491-499. doi:10.3758/BF03196044.
  • Nakajima, S., Tanaka, S., Urushihara, K., & Imada, H. (2000). Renewal of extinguished lever-press responses upon return to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 31, 416-431. doi:10.1006/lmot.2000.1064.
  • Nelson, J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 33, 284-310. doi:10.1006/lmot.2001.1112.
  • Nelson, J. B., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 314-326. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.314.
  • Nelson, J. B., Sanjuan, M. d. C., Vadillo-Ruiz, S., Pérez, J., & León, S. P. (2011). Experimental renewal in human participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 58-70. doi:10.1037/a0020519.
  • Patterson, A. E., & Boakes, R. A. (2012). Interval, blocking, and marking effects during the development of schedule-induced drinking in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 303-314. doi:10.1037/a0027788.
  • Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1978). Overshadowing the instrumental conditioning of a leverpress response by a more valid predictor of the reinforcer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 356-367. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.13.3.271.
  • Pellón, R., & Blackman, D. E. (1987). Punishment of schedule-induced drinking in rats by signaled and unsignaled delays in food presentation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 417-434. doi:10.1901/jeab.1987.48-417.
  • Pellón, R., Ibias, J., & Killeen, P. R. (2015). Delay gradients for spout-licking and magazine-entering induced by a periodic food schedule. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Pellón, R., & Pérez-Padilla, A. (2013). Response-food delay gradients for lever pressing and schedule-induced licking in rats. Learning & Behavior, 41, 218-227. doi:10.3758/s13420-012-0099-x.
  • Porter, J. H., & Kenshalo, D. R. (1974). Schedule-induced drinking following omission of reinforcement in the rhesus monkey. Physiology & Behavior, 12, 1075-1077. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(74)90158-9.
  • Reberg, D. (1980). Reinforcing the occurrence or nonoccurrence of interim drinking. Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 120-128. doi:10.3758/BF03209739.
  • Reid, A. K., & Staddon, J.E. R. (1990). Mechanisms of schedule entrainment. In S. J. Cooper, & C.T. Dourish (Eds.), Neurobiology of Stereotyped Behavior (pp. 200-231). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Rosas, J. M., & Alonso, G. (1997). Forgetting of the CS duration in rats: The role of retention interval and training level. Learning and Motivation, 28, 404-423. doi:10.1006/lmot.1997.0979.
  • Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Renewal of a conditioned taste aversion upon return to the conditioning context after extinction in another one. Learning and Motivation, 28, 216-229. doi:10.1006/lmot.1996.0960.
  • Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval can have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion extinction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 79-83. doi:10.3758/BF03209459.
  • Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 461-474. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.461.
  • Rosas, J. M., Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., & Abad, M. J. F. (2006). Revision of retrieval theory of forgetting: What does make information contextspecific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 147-166.
  • Rosas, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Psicológica, 28, 129-150.
  • Rosas, J. M., Todd, T. P., & Bouton, M. E. (2013). Context change and associative learning. WIREs Cognitive Science,4, 237-244. doi:10.1002/wcs.1225.
  • Staddon, J. E. (1977). Schedule-induced behavior. En W.K. Honig y J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 125-152). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Tamai, N., & Nakajima, S. (2000). Renewal of formerly conditioned fear in rats after extensive extinction training. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 13, 137-146.
  • Thomas, B. L., Larsen, N., & Ayres, J. J. B. (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation, 34, 410-436. doi:10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00037-7.
  • Trask, S., & Bouton, M. E. (2014). Contextual control of operant behavior: Evidence for hierarchical associations in instrumental learning. Learning & Behavior, 42, 281-288. doi:10.3758/s13420-014-0145-y
  • Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2014). The functions of contexts in associative learning. Behavioural Processes, 104, 2-12. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.008.
  • Wayner, M. J., & Greenberg, I. (1973). Schedule dependence of schedule induced polydipsia and lever pressing. Physiology & Behavior, 10, 965-966. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(73)90067-X
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet