Aproximación histórica a los estudios experimentales sobre preferencia visual

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alberti, L. (1485/1991). De re aedificatoria. Madrid: Akal.
• Angier, R. P. (1903). The aesthetics of unequal division. Psychological Review: Monograph Supplement, 4, 541-561.
• Arnheim, R. (1986). Hacia una psicología del arte. Madrid: Alianza.
• Benjafield, J. (1976). The golden rectangle: some new data. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 737-74.
• Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 274-290.
• Berlyne, D. E., Ogilvie, J. C. y Parham, L. C. C. (1968). The dimensionality of visual complexity, interestingness, and pleasingness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 376-387.
• Berlyne, D. E. (1970). The golden section and hedonic judgments of rectangles: A crosscultural study. Sciences of Art, 7, 1-6.
• Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century- Croft.
• Birkhoff, G. D. (1932). Aesthetic Measure. Cambridge: Harvard University.
• Boselie, F. (1992). The golden section has no special aesthetic attractivity! Empirical Studies of the Arts, 10, 1-18.
• Burke, E. (1807/1987). Indagación filosófica sobre el origen de nuestras ideas acerca de lo sublime y de lo bello. Madrid: Tecnos.
• Davis, F. C. (1933). Aesthetic proportion. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 298- 302.
• Doczy, G. (2004). El poder de los límites; proporciones armónicas en la naturaleza,el arte y la arquitectura. Buenos Aires: Troquel.
• Etcoff, N. (1999/2000). La supervivencia de los más guapos. La ciencia de la belleza. Madrid: Debate.
• Eysenck, H. J. (1941). The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48, 83-92.
• Eysenck, H. J. (1942). The experimental study of the ‘Good Gestalt’. A new approach. Psychological Review, 49, 344-363.
• Eysenck, H. J. (1968). An experimental study of aesthetic preference for polygonal figures. The Journal of General Psychology, 79, 3-17.
• Farkas, L.G., Hreczko, T. A., Kolar J. C. y Munro, I. R. (1985). Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revisions of neoclassical canons. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 75, 328-338.
• Feasey, L. (1921). Some experiments of aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 298-302. Fechner, T. (1876/1997). Vorschule der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
• Godkewitsch, M. (1974). The golden section: An artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference. American Journal of Psychology, 87, 269-277.
• Gordon, K. (1929/1970). A criticism of two of Kant’s criteria of the aesthetic. New York: Octagon Books.
• Haines, T. H. y Davies, A. E. (1904). The psychology of aesthetic reaction to rectangular forms. Psychological Review, 11, 249-281.
• Hogeboom, M. y van Leeuwen, C. (1997). Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity. Acta Psychologica, 95, 141-164.
• Konecni, V. J. (1997). The vase on the mantelpiece: The golden section in context. Empirical Studies of Arts, 15, 177-208.
• Konecni, V. J. (2003). On the golden section: elusive, but detectable. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 267-276.
• Konecni, V. J. (2005). On the golden section. Visual Arts Research, 31, 267-276.
• Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Casey R. J. y Sawin D. B. (1995). Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology, 31, 464-472.
• Livio, M. (2006). La proporción áurea: la historia de Phi, el número más enigmático del mundo. Barcelona: Ariel
• Lynch, J. y Hathaway, J. (1994). Projectile Point Morphology: A Note on the Golden Section. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4, 217-220.
• Marty, G. (2002). Formación de esquemas en el reconocimiento de estímulos estéticos. Psicothema, 14, 19-25.
• Marty, G., Cela-Conde, C. J., Munar, E., Rosselló, J., Roca, M. y Escudero, J. T. (2003). Dimensiones factoriales de la experiencia estética. Psicothema, 15, 478-483.
• McManus, I. C. (1980). The aesthetics of simple figures. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 505-524.
• Pacioli, L. (1509/1991). La divina proporción. Madrid: Akal. Pierce. E. (1894). Aesthetics of simple forms. Psychological Review, 1, 483-495.
• Schiffman, H. R. (1966). Golden section: Preferred visual orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 193-194.
• Stone, L. A. y Collins, L. G. (1965). The golden section revisited: A perimetric explanation. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 503-506
• Strother, L. y Kubovy, M. (2003). Perceived complexity and the grouping effect in band patterns. Acta Psychologica, 114, 229-244.
• Svensson, L. (1977). Note on the golden section. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 79-80.
• Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Historia de seis ideas: arte, belleza, forma, creatividad, mímesis, experiencia estética. Madrid: Tecnos.
• Thorndike, E. (1917). Individual differences in judgments of the beauty of simple forms. Psychological Review, 24, 147-153.
• Weber, C. O. (1931). Aesthetics of rectangles and theories of affection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15, 310-318.
• Whitfield, T. W. (2000). Beyond Prototipicality: Toward a Categorical-Motivation Model of Aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 1-11.
• Witmer, L. (1894). Zur experimentellen Aesthetik einfacher raumlicher Formverhaltnisse. Philosophische Studien, 9, 209-263.
• Zeising, A. (1855). Aesthetische Forschungen. Frankfurt: Meidinger.
• Zentner, M. R. y Kagan, J. (1996). Perception of music by infants. Nature, 383, 29.