Relaciones sociales de género de las matronas en una comarca rural de España

  1. Linares Abad, Manuel
  2. Moral Gutiérrez, Inés
  3. Álvarez Nieto, Carmen
  4. Grande Gascón, María Luisa
  5. Pancorbo Hidalgo, Pedro Luis
Revue:
Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

ISSN: 1695-6141

Année de publication: 2012

Volumen: 11

Número: 2

Pages: 364-376

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/EGLOBAL.11.2.145771 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

D'autres publications dans: Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

Résumé

Objective: Increasingly research is giving more importance to Women�s Studies taking into account the context of gender-based social relationships. From this theoretical framework we have focused on the work carried out by midwives in a rural district in southern Spain (Sierra Mágina, Jaén), in order to learn about the social relationships established around their profession. Design: Ethnographic qualitative research using personal interviews and discussion groups. Setting: Rural district of Sierra Mágina (Jaén, Spain). Participants: 9 midwives and 11 close relatives of midwives from this rural district who worked there during the second half of the twentieth century. Also, there were 16 discussion groups with women from towns in the district who had been assisted by midwives. Findings: We have described and analysed discussions with both informants and midwives themselves, the relationships the midwives established in the community and with other health professionals in the districts where they worked. Conclusions: The study of the daily interaction between neighbours and healthcare professionals, and the study of the impact caused by the work performed by midwives brings us closer to their reality, their status, and empowerment.

Références bibliographiques

  • 1. Del Val Valdivieso, M.I. (2004). “A modo de introducción. La historia en los albores del siglo XXI”. [An introduction. The Histoy in the beginning of the XXIth], pp. 11-27 in: Del Val Valdivieso et al. (Eds.), La Historia de las Mujeres: Una revisión Historiográfica. [The women’s history. A historiographic review] Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid.
  • 2. Nash, M. (1996). “Historia e historiografía de las mujeres españolas”. [Spanish women’s history and historiography], pp. 385-404. in: García de León, M.A. and García de Cortazar, M., Sociología de las mujeres españolas. [Spanish women’s sociology]. Editorial Complutense, Madrid.
  • 3. Bernabeu, J. and Cotanda, S. (1991). “Antecedentes históricos del proceso de socialización de la enfermería española”. [Historic background of Spanish nursing]. Enfermería Cientifica. 111: 28-36.
  • 4. Blasco Ordoñez, C. (1993). “La incorporación de practicantes y matronas al sistema sanitario español (1901-1950)”. [Inclusion of healthcare technicians and midwives to Spanish Health system (1901-1950)]. Index de Enfermería. II (4-5): 7-10.
  • 5. Gómez Ruiz, M.D. (1997). “Matronas: ¿cómo ha evolucionado la profesión?” [Midwives: how the profession developed?]. Revista ROL de Enfermería. XX(221): 71-74.
  • 6. Dawley, K. (2002). “Perspectives on the past, view of the present: relationship between nurse-midwifery and nursing in the United States”. Nursing Clinics of North America, 37 (4): 747-755.
  • 7. Ortiz Gómez, T. (2001). “El género organizador de las profesiones sanitarias”. [Gender as organizer in health professions], pp. 53-76 in Miqueo, C. et al.(Eds.), Perspectivas de género en salud. Fundamentos científicos y socioprofesionales de diferencias sexuales no previstas. [Gender outlook in health. Scientific and socio-professional basics for no-predicted sexual differences]. Minerva Ediciones, Madrid.
  • 8. Krueger, Richard A. (1991). “El grupo de discusión. Guía práctica para la investigación aplicada”. [Discussion group. Practice guide for applied research]. Pirámide, Madrid.
  • 9. García Calvente, M.M. and Mateo Rodríguez, I. (2000). “El grupo focal como técnica de investigación cualitativa en salud: diseño y puesta en práctica”. [Discussion group as a qualitative research method: design and implementation]. Atención Primaria, 25, (3): 181- 186.
  • 10. Karnblit, AL. (2004). “Metodologías cualitativas en ciencias sociales”. [Qualitative methods in social sciences]. Bibles, Buenos Aires.
  • 11. Barrio Cantalejo, I. and Simón Lorda P. (2006). “Problemas éticos de la investigación cualitativa” [Ethic issues in qualitative research]. Medicina Clínica, 126 (11): 418-423.
  • 12. Huberman, M. and Miles, M.B. (1994). “Data management and analysis methods”, pp. 428-444 in: Denzin N.K. and Lincon, Y.S., (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
  • 13. López Pegalajar, M. (2002). “Ritos de nacimiento y muerte en Sierra Mágina”. [Rites from birth and death in Sierra Magina]. Sumuntán, 17: 95-108.
  • 14. Linares Abad, M. et al. (2002). “La relación de ayuda a la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio del primer hijo”. [The relationship of help to women during first child pregnancy and birth]. Index de Enfermería, 38: 9-14.
  • 15. Bernabeu, J. (2002). “Madres y enfermeras. Demografía y salud en la política poblacionista del primer franquismo, 1939-1950”. [Mothers and nurses. Demographic and health in first franquismo population politic, 1939-1950] Revista de demografía histórica XX, I: 123-143.
  • 16. Stone, S.E. (2000). “The evolving scope of nurse-midwifery practice in the United States”. Journal Midwifery Women Health, 45(6): 522-531.
  • 17. Scoggin, J. (1997). “The historical relationship of nurse-midwifery with medicine”. Journal Nurse Midwifery, 42(1): 47-52.
  • 18. Bortin, S. (1993). “Interviews with Mexican midwives”. Journal of Nurse Midwifery. 38(3). 170-177.
  • 19. Trueba, G. (1994). “Midwifery in Mexico”. Modern Midwife, 4(4): 28-29.
  • 20. Ventre, F. et al. (1995). “The transition from lay mid wife to certified nurse-midwife in the United States”. Journal of Nurse Midwifery, 40(5): 428-437.
  • 21. Troskie, T.R. (1997). “The importance of traditional midwives in the delivery of health care in the republic of South Africa”. Curationis, 20(1): 15-20.
  • 22. Mcintosh, T. (1998). “Profession, skill, or domestic duty?”. Social history of medicine, 11(13): 403-420.
  • 23. Marland, H. and Rafferty, A.M. (Eds.) (1997). “Midwives, society and childbirth. Debates and controversies in the modern period”. Routledge. London.
  • 24. Palacio Lis, I. (2003). “Mujeres ignorantes: madres culpables. Adoctrinamiento y divulgación materno-infantil en la primera mitad del siglo XX”. [Ignorant women: guilty mothers. Indoctrination and spreading for mothers and children in first half of the XX century]. Universidad de Valencia, Valencia.
  • 25. Rhodes, M. (2001). “Saber y práctica de la matronería en Gran Bretaña, 1936-1950”. [Knowledge and practice in Midwifery in United Kingdom, 1936-1950] , pp.189-213 in: Cabré, M. and Ortiz. T. Sanadoras, matronas y médicas en Europa. [Healer, midwives and physician women in Europe]. Icaria, Barcelona.
La source de données: Dialnet