Diseño y validación de una escala de percepción del riesgo en actividades físico-deportivas escolares

  1. Latorre Román, Pedro Ángel
  2. Pantoja Vallejo, Antonio
Revista:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726,  1988-2041

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 21

Páginas: 25-29

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Resumen

The main objective of this study has been the design of an instrument that let us to know the capacity of perception of children�s risk, as the element for the promotion of safety and prevention of injuries at school sports activities. Method: It has been designed a questionnaire based on items of significant images of the school sports context. The Testate sample was 637 both sexes� students, from 8 to 14 years old. The psychometric properties of the scale were obtained through a process of validity of content with experts and a principal component factor analysis. Results: we obtained a questionnaire of 32 items adjusted to the topics of scientific reliability and validity. Conclusions: this is a valid instrument to detect easily the perception of the risk at sports facilities and situations of physical activity, serving as a base for teachers for the class organization, taking into account this aspect.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abenza, L., Olmedilla, A., Ortega, E., & Esparza, F. (2009). Estados de ánimo y adherencia a la rehabilitación de deportistas lesionados. Apunts Medicina de l’Esport, 161, 29-37.
  • Andersen, M. B., & Williams, J. M. (1999). Athletic injury, psychosocial factors, and perceptual changes during stress. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 735-741.
  • Crocker, J. C., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Cutter, S. L. (1993) Living with Risk. Londres: Edward Arnold.
  • Elbel, R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement. Englewoods Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
  • Escalante, E., & Caro, A. (2006). Investigación y análisis estadísticos de datos en SPSS. Mendoza: FEEyE.
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330-344.
  • García-Ros, R., Molina, J. G., & Ferrando, P. J. (2001). Evaluación de la percepción de riesgo en la Educación Vial: desarrollo de una escala dirigida a escolares de Educación Primaria y Secundaria. Psicothema, 13(2), 234-239.
  • Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., Chandler, C., & Elkin, D. (2005).Predictors of Children’s and Adolescents’ Risk Perception. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30(5), 425-435.
  • Hansen, C. P. (2005). Personality characteristics of the accident involved employee. Journal of Business & Psychology, 2(4), 346-365.
  • Hendrickx, L. C. (1991). How Versus How Often. The role of Scenario Information and Frecuency Information in Risk Judgment and Risky Decision Making. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  • Henniger, M. (1994).Planning for outdoor play. Young Children, 49(4): 10-15.
  • Hillier, L., & Morrongiello, B. A. (1998). Age and gender differences in school-age children’s appraisal of injury risk. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23, 229–238.
  • Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking and risk appraisal and risk behavior. Personality & Individual Differences, 14, 41–52.
  • Ivarsson, A., & Urban, J. (2010). Psychological factors as predictors of injuries among senior soccer players. A prospective study. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9, 347-352.
  • Jack, J., & Ronan K. R. (1998). Sensation seeking among high- and lowrisk sports participants. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, (6), 1063-1083.
  • Jornet, J. M., & Suárez, J. M. (1996). Pruebas estandarizadas y evaluación del rendimiento: usos y características métricas. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 14(2), 141-163.
  • Kontos, A (2004). Perceived Risk, Risk Taking, Estimation of Ability and Injury Among Adolescent Sport Participants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29(6), 447-455.
  • Latorre, P. A., & Muñoz, A. (2011). Manual de control de la seguridad de los espacios y equipamientos deportivos de uso escolar. Jaén: Diputación de Jaén.
  • Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2010). Individual differences in children’s risk perception and appraisals in outdoor play environments. Int J Early Years Educ, 18(4): 297- 313.
  • Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2008). Outdoor Play: Does Avoiding the Risks Reduce the Benefits? Aust J Early Child; 33(2): 33-40.
  • López, B., & Osca, A. (2007). Factores explicativos de la accidentalidad en jóvenes: Un análisis de la investigación. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 79, 75-89.
  • Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Real Decreto 1513/2006, de 7 de diciembre, por el que se establecen las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria. BOE Número 293 de 08/12/2006.
  • Morrongiello, B. A. (1997). Children’s perspectives on injury and close call experiences: Sex differences in injury-outcome processes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 499–512.
  • Morrongiello, B. A., & Rennie, H. (1998). Why do boys engage in more risk taking than girls? The role of attributions, beliefs, and risk appraisals. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 33–43.
  • Morrongiello, B. A., & Matheis, S. (2007). Addressing the Issue of Falls off Playground Equipment: An Empirically-Based Intervention to Reduce Fall-Risk Behaviors on Playgrounds. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(7), 819-830.
  • Roid, G. H., & Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • Rojas, A. J., Fernández, J. A., & Pérez, C. (1998). Investigar mediante encuestas. Fundamentos teóricos y aspectos prácticos. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Schwebel D., & Barton, B. (2005). Contributions of Multiple Risk Factors to Child Injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30(7), 553-561.
  • Sivak, M., Soler, J., Trankle, U., & Spagnhol, J. M. (1989). Crosscultural differences in driver risk-perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 21, 355-362.
  • Tójar, J. C., & Matas, A. (2009). Fundamentos metodológicos básicos. En A. Pantoja (Coord.), Manual básico para la realización de tesinas, tesis y trabajos de investigación (pp. 127-152). Madrid: EOS.
  • Van der Pligt, J. (1994). Risk appraisal and health behavior. In D. R. Rutter & L. Quine (Eds.), Social psychology and health: European perspectives. (pp. 131–151). Brookfield VT: Avebury.
  • Williams, J. M., & Andersen, M.B. (1998). Psychosocial antecedents of sport injury: Review and critique of the stress and injury model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10, 5-25.
  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet