Fiabilidad, validez factorial y datos normativos de la versión española del inventario abreviado de reacciones interpersonales (SIRI) de Grossarth-Maticek y Eysenck
- Martínez Correa, Alfonso
- Reyes del Paso, Gustavo Adolfo
ISSN: 1136-5420
Any de publicació: 2007
Volum: 12
Número: 2
Pàgines: 131-142
Tipus: Article
Altres publicacions en: Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica
Resum
Eysenck and Grossarth-Maticek�s model states that some of their personality types are predisposed to specific illnesses (Types 1 and 5 to cancer, and Type 2 to coronary heart disease), whereas others are preserved (Type 4) or not predisposed (Types 3 and 6). The aim of this study is to provide infor-mation as regards the reliability, factor validity and normative data of the Spanish version of Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck´s Short Interpersonal Reactions Inventory (SIRI) in a sample of uni-versity students (N=425). The results indicate that 1) internal consistency is adequate (0,88-0,75); 2) factor analysis suggests that this instrument measures four dimensions: Factor 1 compounded by Types 1 and 2 (psychosomatic risk), Factor 2 constituted by Types 3 and 6 (hysteria/psychopathy), Factor 3 configured by Type 5 (rationality) and Factor 4 defined by Type 4 (autonomy); and 3) distribu-tion of personality types is similar to that found in prior studies with samples of young subjects.
Referències bibliogràfiques
- Alexander, F. (1950). Psychosomatic Medicine. New York: Norton.
- Argyle, M. (1997). Is happiness a cause of health? Psychology and Health, 12, 769-781.
- Becoña, E. (2006). Resiliencia, definición, características y utilidad del concepto. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 11, 125-146.
- Booth-Kewley, S., & Friedman, H. (1987). Psychological predictors of heart disease: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 343-362.
- Chang, E.C. (1998). Dispositional optimism and primary and secondary appraisal of a stressor: Controlling for confounding influences and relations to coping and psychological and physical adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1109-1120.
- Chorot, P. y Sandín, B. (1991). Inventario Abreviado de Reacciones Interpersonales. III Congreso de Evaluación Psicológica. Barcelona, 25-28 de septiembre.
- Comrey, A.L. (1985). Manual de análisis factorial. Madrid: Cátedra.
- Contrada, R.J., Leventhal, H., & O´Leary, A. (1990). Personality and health. En Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Tabaco, personalidad y estrés. Barcelona: Herder (Orig. 1991).
- Eysenck, H.J. (1990). The prediction of death from cancer by means of personality/stress questionnaire: Too good to be true? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 216-218.
- Eysenck, H.J. (1988). Behavior therapy as an aid in the prevention of cancer and coronary heart disease. Scandinavian Journal of Behavior Therapy, 17, 171-188.
- Eysenck, H.J. (1985). Personality, cancer and cardiovascular disease: A causal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 535-556.
- Eysenck, H.J., & Grossarth-Maticek, R. (1991). Creative novation behaviour therapy as a prophylactic treatment for cancer and coronary heart disease. II: Effects of treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 17-31.
- Grossarth-Maticek, R., Bastiaans, J., & Kanazir, D.T. (1985). Psychosocial factors as strong predictors of mortality from cancer, ischemic heart disease and stroke. The Yugoslav Prospective Study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 167-176.
- Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Eysenck, H.J. (1991). Creative novation behaviour therapy as a prophylactic treatment for cancer and coronary heart disease. I: Description of treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 1-16.
- Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Eysenck, H.J. (1990a). Personality, stress and disease: Description and validation of a new inventory. Psychological Reports, 66, 355-373.
- Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Eysenck, H.J. (1990b). Prophylactic effects of Psychoanalysis on cancer-prone and coronary heart disease-prone probands, as a compared with control groups and behaviour therapy groups. Journal Behavioural Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 21, 91-99.
- Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H.J., & Vetter, H. (1988). Personality type, smoking habit and their interaction as predictors of cancer and coronary heart disease. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 479-495.
- Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
- López, A.E., Ramírez, E., Esteve, R., & Anarte, M.T. (2002). El constructo tipo C: Una contribución a su definición a partir de datos empíricos. Psicología Conductual, 10, 229-249.
- Martínez-Correa, A. y Reyes del Paso, G.A. (2004). Personalidad y factores clásicos de riesgo en la predicción de la enfermedad somática: Un análisis de la validez convergente y discriminante del modelo de Eysenck y Grossarth-Maticek en sujetos análogos. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 30, 349-403.
- Martínez-Correa, A., Reyes del Paso, G.A., García-León, A., y González-Jareño, M.I. (2006). Optimismo/pesimismo disposicional y estrategias de afrontamiento del estrés. Psicothema, 18, 66-72.
- Mettler, C.C., & Mettler, F.A. (1947). History of Medicine. Philadelphia: Blakiston.
- Morris, T., & Greer, S. (1980). A «Type C for cancer»? Cancer Detection and Prevention, 3(1), 102.
- Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Jiménez, M.P., & Santed, M.A. (1994). Stress behavior types, psychosomatic complaints and disease. Stress News, 5(3), 4-9.
- Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Navas, M.J., y Santed M.A. (1992). Estrés y enfermedad: Inventario de Reacciones Interpersonales de Grossarth-Maticek y Eysenck. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 45, 391-396.
- Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Santed, M.A., & Jiménez, M.P. (1994). Stress behavior types, personality, alexithymia, coping and state-trait anger expression. Stress News, 5(4), 2-8.
- Sandín, B., Valiente, R.M., y Chorot, P. (1999). Evaluación del estrés psicosocial: Material de apoyo. En B. Sandín (Ed.), El estrés psicosocial: Conceptos y consecuencias clínicas (pp. 245-316). Madrid: Klinik.
- Santed, M.A., Sandín, B., y Chorot, P. (1996). Cuestionario de Estrés Diario (CED): Validez de constructo y el problema de la confusión de medidas. Boletín de Psicología, 51, 45-70.
- Siegman, A.W., Townsend, S.T., Civelek, A.C., & Blumenthal, R.S. (2000). Antagonistic behavior, dominance, hostility and coronary heart disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 248-257.
- Smedslund, G. (1995). Personality and vulnerability to cancer and heart disease: Relations to demographic and life-style variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 691-697.
- Solomon, G. (1987). Psychoneuroimmunology: Interaction between central nervous system and immune system. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 18, 1-9.
- Spielberger, C.D. (1988). The Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness (R/ED) Scale: Preliminary test manual. University of South Florida, Tampa: Center for Research in Behavioral Medicine and Health Psychology.
- Temoshock, L. (1987). Personality, coping style, emotion and cancer: Towards an integrative model. Cancer Surveys, 6, 545-567.
- Temoshok, L., Heller, B.W., Sagebiel, R.W., Blois, M.S., Sweet, D.M., Di Clemente, R.J., & Gold, M.L. (1985). The relationship of psychosocial factors to prognostic indicators in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 139-154.
- Terada, K., Kawakami, N., Inaba, S., Takatsuka, N., & Shimizu, H. (2000). Rationality/Antiemotionality Personality and selected chronic diseases in a community population in Japan. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 48, 31-35.
- Vera, B., Carbelo, B., y Vecina, M.L. (2006). La experien- cia traumática desde la Psicología Positiva: Resiliencia y crecimiento postraumático. Papeles del Psicólogo, 27, 40-49.
- Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234-254.
- Wolff, H.G. (1950). Life stress and bodily disease. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.