The trip to the dialoge. The labyrinth of the postmodern anthropology

Referencias bibliográficas

• Badcock, B. A. (1993) “Feminisms-pretexts: fragments, questions, and reflections”, Anthropology Quarterly, 66, 2: 59-66.
• Betteille, A.; Madan, T. N. (1975) Encounter and Experience: Personal Accounts of Fieldwork. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
• Boddy, J. (1991) “Anthropology, feminism and the postmodern context”, Culture, 11, 1-2: 125-133.
• Briggs, J. L. (1970) Never in Anger: Portrait of an Eskimo Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Calkowski, M. S. (1991) “Is there authoritative voice in Rework talk? On postmodernism, fieldwork, and the recovery of unintended meanings”, Cultural Anthropology, 6, 4: 538-552.
• Clifford, J. (1991a) “Sobre la alegoría etnográfica”, in Clifford, J.; Marcus, G. E. (eds.), Retóricas de la antropología, pp. 151-182. Madrid, Gijón: Júcar. [(1986) Writeng Culture: The Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: California University Press].
• Clifford, J. (1991b) “Introducción: verdades parciales”, in Clifford, J.; Marcus, G. E. (eds.), Retóricas de la antropología, pp. 25-60. Madrid, Gijón: Júcar. [(1986) Writeng Culture: The Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: Berkeley: California University Press].
• Clifford, J. (1995) Dilemas de la cultura. Barcelona: Gedisa. [(1988) The Predicaments Of Culture. Harvard University Press].
• Clifford, J.; Marcus, G. E. (eds.) (1991) Retóricas de la antropología. Madrid, Gijón: Júcar. [(1986) Writeng Culture: The Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: California University Press].
• Couldry, N. (1996) “Speaking about others and speaking personally: Reflections after Elspeth Probyn’s sexing the self”, Cultural Studies, 10, 2: 315-333.
• Crapanzano, V. (1972) The Fifth World of Foster Bennet: Portrait of a Navaho. NewYork: Viking.
• Crapanzano, V. (1977) “The Writing of Ethnography”, Dialectical Anthropology, 2: 69-73.
• Crapanzano, V. (1980) Tuhami: Portrait of a Maroon. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Delgado Ruiz, M. (1993) “Antropologia i nihilisme o ¿qués l’antropologia postmoderna?”, Revista de Etnología de Catalunya, 3: 94-111.
• Denzin, N. K. (1989) “Reading-writing culture: interpreting the postmodern project”, Cultural Dynamic, 2, 1: 9-27.
• Derrida, J. (1978) De la gramatología. México: Siglo XXI. [(1967) De la grammatologie. Paris: Philippe Sollers].
• Derrida, J (1987) Psyché. Paris: Galilée.
• Di-Leonardo, M. (1993) “What a difference political economy makes: feminist anthropology in the postmodern era”, Anthropology Quarterly, 66, 2: 76-80.
• Doody, R. S. (1991) “Aphasia as postmodern. Anthropological discourse”, Journal of Anthropology Researchs, 47, 3: 285-303.
• Downs, Ll. (1993) “If «woman» is just an empty category, then why am I afraid to walk alone at night? Identity politics meets the postmodern subject”, Complet Studies of Social History, 35, 2: 414-437.
• Dwyer, K. (1977) “The Dialogic of Anthropology”, Dialectical Anthropology, 2: 143-151.
• Dwyer, K. (1982) Morroccan Dialogues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• García Canclini, N. (1991) “¿Construcción o simulacro del objeto de estudio? Trabajo de campo y retórica textual”, Alteridades, 1, 1: 58-64. México.
• Geertz, C. (1990) La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa. [(1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books].
• Geertz, C. (1994a) Conocimiento local. Barcelona: Paidós. [(1983) Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books].
• Geertz, C. (1994b) Observando el Islán. Barcelona: Paidós. [(1968) Islam Observed. Chicago: Chicago University Press].
• Geertz, C. (1996) Tras los hechos. Dos paises, cuatro décadas y un antropólogo. Barcelona: Paidós. [(1995) After the Fact. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press].
• Giobelina, F. (1990) Sentido y orden. Estudios de clasificaciones simbólicas. Madrid: CSIC.
• Goldstein, D. M. (1991) “Hermeneutics and ethnography: an interpretation of two texts”, Arizona Anthropology, 7: 21-30. [Texts: J. Comaroff. 1985. Body of power, spirit of resistance. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press. M. T. Taussig. 1980. The devil and commodity fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill: Univ North Carolina Prress].
• Gordon, D. A. (1993) “The unhappy relationship of feminism and postmodernism in anthropology”, Anthropology Quaterly, 66, 3: 109-117.
• Hutnyk, John (1998) “Clifford´s Ethnografica”, en Critique of Anthropology, 18, 4: 339-378.
• Jenkin, R. (1996) “Ethnicity etcetera: social anthropological points of view”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 19, 4: 807-822.
• Johannsen, A. M. (1992) “Applied anthropology and post-modernist ethnography”, Human Organization, 51, 1: 71-81.
• Keesing, R. M. (1987) “Anthropology as interpretative quest”, Current Anthropology, 28, 2: 161- 176.
• Kirby, V. (1989) “Re-writing: postmodernism and ethnography”, Mankind, 1: 36-45. (1993) “Feminisms and postmodernisms: anthropology and the management of difference”, Anthropology Quaterly, 66, 3: 127-133.
• Kuznar, L. A. (1997) Reclaiming a scientific anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
• Lambek, M. (1991) “Treading beyond objectivism”, Culture, 11, 1-2: 3-27.
• Llobera, J. R. (1975) “Post-scriptum: Algunas tesis provisionales sobre la naturaleza de la antropología”, in Llobera, J. R. (Ed), La antropología como ciencia, pp. 373-387. Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Llobera, J. R. (1990) La identidad de la antropología. Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Marcus, G. E. (ed.) (1999) Critical anthropology now: unexpected contexts, shifting constituencies, changing agendas. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press. Marcus, G. E.; Fischer, M. (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Mascia-Lees, F. E.; Sharpe, P.; Cohen, C. B. (1987) “The postmodernist turn in anthropology: cautions from a feminist perspective”, Journal of Steward Anthropologist Society, 17, 1-2: 251-282.
• Middleton, J. (1984) Los Lugbara de Uganda. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. (Orig. 1970).
• Nivón, E.; Rosas, A. M. (1991) “Para interpretar a Clifford Geertz. Símbolos y metáforas en el análisis de la cultura”, Alteridades, 1, 1: 40-49. México.
• Pérez, S. (1991) “El espíritu en sí mismo: Claude Lévi-Strauss y el idealismo crítico”, Alteridades, 1, 1: 71-79. México.
• Piron, F. (1992) “Les enjeux de la production de connaissances: essai sur le pouvoir, le savoir et la solidarit féministe”, Culture, 12, 2: 63-82.
• Pool, R. (1991) “Postmodern ethnography?”, Critique Anthropology, 11, 4: 3O9-331.
• Powdermaker, H. (1966) Stranger and Friend: The Way of an Anthropologist. Nueva York: Norton.
• Rabinow, P. (1992) Reflexiones sobre un trabajo de campo en Marruecos. Madrid, Gijón: Júcar. [(1977) Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press].
• Reynoso, C. (Comp.) (1991) El surgimiento de la antropología posmoderna. México: Gedisa.
• Rothfield, P. (1991) “Alternative epistemologies, politics and feminism”, Social Analisys, 30: 54- 67.
• Sangren, P. S. (1988) “Rhetoric and the authority of ethnography: «postmodernism» and the social reproduction of texts”, Current Anthropologist, 29, 3: 4O5-435.
• Saraswati, B. (ed.) (2001) The nature of man and culture: alternative paradigms in anthropology. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, Aryan Books International
• Schneider, M. (1987) “Culture-as-text in the work of Clifford Geertz”, Theory and Society, 16: 809- 839.
• Scott, D. C. (1992) “Criticism and culture: theory and post-colonial claims on anthropological disciplinarity”, Critical Anthropology, 12, 4: 371-394.
• Shankman, P. (1984) “The Thick and the Thin: On the Interpretative Theoretical Program of Clifford Geertz”, Current Anthropology, 25, 3: 261-279.
• Sharpe, P.; Mascia-Lees, F. E. (1993) “«Always believe the victim», «innocent until proven guilty», «there is no truth»: the competing claims of feminism, humanism, and postmodernism in interpreting charges of harassment in the academy”, Anthropology Quaterly, 66, 2: 87-98.
• Smith, P. (1988) Discerning the Subject. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
• Sperber, D. (1985) On anthropological knowledge: three essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Spindeler, G. D. (1970) Being An Anthropologist: Fieldwork in Eleven Cultures. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Stoller, P. (1991) “High in fiber, low in content: reflections on postmodern anthropology”, Culture, 11, 1-2: 101-110.
• Taussing, M. T. (1980). The devil and commodity fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ North Carolina Prress.
• Taussing, M. T. ( Taussing, M. T. ( (1986) Shamanism, colonialism, and the wild man, a study in terror and healing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Taussing, M. T. ( (1992) The Nervous System. London: Routledge.
• Taylor, L. (1991) “Notes on historicity, postmodernism, and the social subject”, Visual Anthropology Review, 7, 1: 2-6.
• Thomas, N. (1991) “The curiosity of the gaze: imperial and anthropological postmodernism”, Social Analisys, 30: 20-31.
• Tilde, M. N. (1991) “Racionalidade e alteridade: o terreno antropologico deslocado, o «outro» aqui e agora”, Anthropology Portrait, 9-10: 179-193.
• Tyler, S. A. (1978) The Said and the Unsaid. Nueva York: Academic Press. (1984) “The poetic turn in postmodern anthropology: the poetry of Paul Friedrich”, American Anthropologist, 86, 2: 328-36.
• Tyler, S. A. (1987) The unspeakable: Discourse, dialogue and rhetoric in tke post modern world. Madison: Wisconsin University Press.
• Tyler, S. A. (1991) “Etnografía postmoderna: desde el documento de lo oculto al culto al documento”, in Clifford, J.; Marcus, G. E. (eds.), Retóricas de la antropología, pp. 183-204. Madrid, Gijón: Júcar. [(1986) Writeng Culture: The Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: California University Press].
• Ulin, R. C. (1991) “Critical anthropology twenty years later: modernism and postmodernism in anthropology”, Critique Anthropologist, 11, 1: 63-89.
• Valjavec, F. (1992) “Zeugnis und Zeugen: Selbstverstndnis und Ausblicke einer reflexiven Ethnologie”, Anthropos St. Augustin, 87, 4-6: 489-509.
• Whitaker, M. P. (1996) “Ethnography as Learning: A Wittgensteinian Aproach to Writing Ethnographic Accounts”, Anthropological Quarterly, 69, 1: 1-13.
• Williams, S. (1993) “Abjection and anthropological praxis”, Anthropology Quaterly, 66, 2: 67-75.
• Winch, P. (1994) The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge.
• Yeatman, A. (1991a) “Postmodern critical theorising: introduction”, Social Analisys, 30: 3-9. (1991b) “Postmodernity and revisioning the political”, Social Analisys, 30: 116-130.