Promover la indagación en matemáticas y cienciasdesarrollo profesional docente en primaria y secundaria

  1. Antonio Quesada-Armenteros 1
  2. Marta Romero Ariza 1
  3. Ana María Abril Gallego 1
  4. García García, Francisco Javier
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Revue:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X,  2174-5374

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 22

Número: 2

Pages: 335-359

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/EDUCXX1.23513 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Résumé

Our study is placed in the intersection of two problems: pedagogical renewal in the teaching of Science and Mathematics towards inquiryoriented perspectives, and the transformative professional development of teachers. Within a European project, a professional development program about inquiry-based learning was designed and implemented in 13 European countries. Tools to measure teachers’ evolution within the program were also designed and validated. In this paper we focus on the Spanish case (18 professional development programmes implemented, with Primary and Secondary school teachers). They filled in a questionnaire before their participation in the programmes and when they finished. The questionnaire addressed different dimensions about inquiry-based learning (beliefs, teaching practices, perceived barriers and obstacles). Then, the second questionnaire addressed teachers’ perceptions of the professional development process they experienced, and the impact teachers perceived on their teaching practices. Results show an increment in all of the dimensions analysed about inquiry-based learning, as well as an improvement in teachers’ perception of barriers and obstacles that hinder the use of this pedagogy. However, despite the progress observed, teachers’ practices do not reflect a wider use of this pedagogy as yet. Results also show that teachers positively value the professional development process experienced, with a positive perception of the impact of the programme on their teaching abilities, despite the moderate transformation they reported on their teaching practices. In summary, from the results, we extract relevant conclusions about inquiry-based learning dimensions that should be addressed deeply in professional development programmes, as well as about professional learning processes that should be enhanced to strengthen the transformative potential of such programmes.

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

Investigación financiada por la Unión Europea, proyecto nº 320693, 7º Programa Marco, 2013-2016

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
  • Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797-810. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
  • Caprile, M., Palmén, R., Sanz, P., & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labour market. Brussel, Belgium: European Parliament.
  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
  • Couso, D., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., López-Ruiz, J., Mans C., Rodriguez Espinosa, J.M., y Sanmartí, N. (2011). Informe ENCIENDE. Enseñanza de las Ciencias en la Didáctica Escolar para Edades Tempranas en España. Barcelona: Rubes Editorial.
  • Donnell, L.A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers’ acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, selfefficacy, and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.003
  • Dorier, J-L., & García, F.J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 837-849. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0512-8
  • Engeln, K. (2017). Report on the largescale survey about inquiry-based learning and teaching in the European partner countries. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2BNF4px
  • Engeln, K., Euler, M., & Maaβ, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: a comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 823-836. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0507-5
  • European Comission (2009). Common European principles for teacher competences and qualifications. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2T5IFG9
  • Gago, J.M. (2004). Europe needs More Scientists. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Glackin, M. (2016). ‘Risky fun’ or ‘Authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development program on outdoor learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 409-433. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1145368
  • Guskey, T. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512
  • Hord, S.M., & Hirsh, S.A. (2008). Making the promise a reality. En A.M. Blankstein, P.D. Houston & R.W. Cole (Eds.), Sustaining professional learning communities (23-40). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press.
  • Huh, J., Delorme, D.E., & Reid, L.N. (2006). Perceived Third-Person Effects and Consumer Attitudes on Prevetting and Banning DTC Advertising. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40(1), 90-116. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00047.x
  • Jones, M.T., & Eick, C.J. (2007). Implementing inquiry kit curriculum: Obstacles, adaptations, and practical knowledge development in two middle school science teachers. Science Education, 91(3), 492-513. doi: 10.1002/sce.20197
  • Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 40(3), 336-351. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.929293
  • Lakshmanan A., Heath B.P., Perlmutter A., & Elder M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534-551. doi: 10.1002/tea.20404
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press.
  • McConney, A., Oliver, M.C., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross-National Analysis Using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963-980. doi: 10.1002/sce.21135
  • National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, USA: National Academies Press. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments. First Results from TALIS.Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2SXwOhs
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments. First Results from TALIS.Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2SXwOhs
  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2RfBCdr
  • Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of the Decline in Interest. Towards School Science and Technology from Grades 5 Through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784-802. doi: 10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x
  • Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science Education Now: A renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussel, Belgium: European Comission. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/1ixEQz5
  • Romero-Ariza, M. (2017). El aprendizaje por indagación: ¿existen suficientes evidencias sobres sus beneficios en la enseñanza de las ciencias? Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(2), 286-299. doi: 10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2017.v14.i2.01
  • Romero-Ariza, M., Quesada, A., & Abril, A.M. (2017). Science Teachers as Key Actors in Responsible Research and innovation: Evaluation of a teacher training program. Sisyphus. Journal of Education, 5(3), 107-121. doi: 10.25749/sis.12274
  • Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching classroom practices. En A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick y F.K.S. Leung (eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (643-687). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_22
  • Thurlings, M., & den Brok, P. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: a meta-study. Educational Review, 69(5), 554-576. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2017.1281226
La source de données: Dialnet